A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

P&S cameras plumb the depths Part II - Samsung's garbage



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 24th 07, 11:31 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Rich
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 718
Default P&S cameras plumb the depths Part II - Samsung's garbage

What could be worse? I criticized some entry-level DSLRs because of
their flimsy plastic shells.
But, at least cameras like the Canon Rebel XTi take excellent pictures.
Take a look at the results from this
Samsung P&S piece of s---!!!!

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/samsungnv7/page7.asp

The WORST possible scenario; A solid machined metal and EXPENSIVE
housing, covering a CRAPPY
worthless sensor!!! This is worse than Leica re-skinning Panasonic
P&S's and upping the price 50%!!!

  #2  
Old January 27th 07, 05:01 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
John Turco
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,436
Default P&S cameras plumb the depths Part II - Samsung's garbage

Rich wrote:

What could be worse? I criticized some entry-level DSLRs because of
their flimsy plastic shells.
But, at least cameras like the Canon Rebel XTi take excellent pictures.
Take a look at the results from this
Samsung P&S piece of s---!!!!

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/samsungnv7/page7.asp

The WORST possible scenario; A solid machined metal and EXPENSIVE
housing, covering a CRAPPY
worthless sensor!!! This is worse than Leica re-skinning Panasonic
P&S's and upping the price 50%!!!



Hello, Rich:

Samsung does make a number of other fine and diverse electronic devices,
though; it's hardly a camera specialist, after all. g

Regardless, I agree with your assessment of the NV7 OPS, itself. It's
a monstrosity!

Not only is it ugly, but it's limited to JPEG capture. Now, wouldn't
one logically assume that such an ambitious effort on Samsung's part,
should've included RAW and/or TIFF shooting options?


Cordially,
John Turco
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Garbage in JPG Comment field Terry Pinnell Digital Photography 13 December 21st 06 09:32 AM
Why do most digital cameras have so tiny flash - Part 2 [email protected] Digital Photography 6 December 11th 06 05:58 AM
Exploring High Bit Depths in Photoshop Frank ess Digital Photography 2 October 28th 05 07:43 AM
Canon is Garbage smsastro Digital Photography 71 October 15th 05 05:25 PM
Canon is Garbage None Digital SLR Cameras 2 January 8th 05 04:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.