![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#211
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/16/2014 11:48 AM, PAS wrote:
"Whisky-dave" wrote in message ... On Monday, 16 June 2014 15:15:26 UTC+1, PAS wrote: No, but in many cases there is far too much regulation of ownership. In which particualar cases would you say are over regulated ? Where I live, in Suffolk County on Long Island. In a nutshell, this is the process I had to go through to get my handgun license and first handgun: 1) Fill out a long application including all previous addresses. 2) Provide three personal references and signed and noarized affadavits from them 3) The references and my employer were all interviewed 4) I had to be fingerprinted & interviewed 5) I was warned of what could disqualify me from being approved. Among them was getting a traffic ticket within the application process timeframe. 6) I was approved after approximately six months from the time I applied 7) I can no purchase a handgun. I went to a gun dealer and made my purchase. But I could not take possession. I had to get a form filled out by the dealer 8) I take the form to the police department and they review the form and then must approve the form and stamp it 9) I take the form back to the dealer and then take possession 10) I have to bring the handgun to the police department for their inspection and then to record the serial number on my license 11) I am only permitted to take the handgun from my home directly to firing range and then directly back home when finished. I cannot make any stops along the way, no exceptions. If I do, I can lose my license. That my friend, is over regulated. Well, you got your gun! Just think what it would be like in the UK. -- Jim Silverton (Potomac, MD) Extraneous "not." in Reply To. |
#212
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"James Silverton" wrote in message
... On 6/16/2014 11:48 AM, PAS wrote: "Whisky-dave" wrote in message ... On Monday, 16 June 2014 15:15:26 UTC+1, PAS wrote: No, but in many cases there is far too much regulation of ownership. In which particualar cases would you say are over regulated ? Where I live, in Suffolk County on Long Island. In a nutshell, this is the process I had to go through to get my handgun license and first handgun: 1) Fill out a long application including all previous addresses. 2) Provide three personal references and signed and noarized affadavits from them 3) The references and my employer were all interviewed 4) I had to be fingerprinted & interviewed 5) I was warned of what could disqualify me from being approved. Among them was getting a traffic ticket within the application process timeframe. 6) I was approved after approximately six months from the time I applied 7) I can no purchase a handgun. I went to a gun dealer and made my purchase. But I could not take possession. I had to get a form filled out by the dealer 8) I take the form to the police department and they review the form and then must approve the form and stamp it 9) I take the form back to the dealer and then take possession 10) I have to bring the handgun to the police department for their inspection and then to record the serial number on my license 11) I am only permitted to take the handgun from my home directly to firing range and then directly back home when finished. I cannot make any stops along the way, no exceptions. If I do, I can lose my license. That my friend, is over regulated. Well, you got your gun! Just think what it would be like in the UK. True, in the UK it's impossible to get one. |
#213
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/16/2014 9:04 AM, PAS wrote:
"PeterN" wrote in message ... On 6/13/2014 12:31 PM, PAS wrote: "PeterN" wrote in message snip Are you saying that there should e no regulation of ownership of weapons? Discussion of the degree of regulation is a different discussion than whether ownership should be regulated. No I am not. But there is too much regulation in many cases, as I've demonstrated. At least we agree on something. How much is too much, can lead to interesting discussions. I can see the reasonable logic for the regulations you have complained about. Don't we agree on rum raisin too? And Snowflake & (I think,) Magic Fountain in Mattituck. -- PeterN |
#214
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"PeterN" wrote in message
... On 6/16/2014 9:04 AM, PAS wrote: "PeterN" wrote in message ... On 6/13/2014 12:31 PM, PAS wrote: "PeterN" wrote in message snip Are you saying that there should e no regulation of ownership of weapons? Discussion of the degree of regulation is a different discussion than whether ownership should be regulated. No I am not. But there is too much regulation in many cases, as I've demonstrated. At least we agree on something. How much is too much, can lead to interesting discussions. I can see the reasonable logic for the regulations you have complained about. Don't we agree on rum raisin too? And Snowflake & (I think,) Magic Fountain in Mattituck. LOL, we were just at the Magic Fountain this past weekend. There is another place in Center Moriches on Montauk Highway - "The Ice Cream Cottage" - that is really great. They make a chocolate fudge ice cream that has those jelly rings in it. It's amazing. |
#215
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Whisky-dave" wrote in message
... On Monday, 16 June 2014 20:37:56 UTC+1, PAS wrote: "James Silverton" wrote in message ... On 6/16/2014 11:48 AM, PAS wrote: "Whisky-dave" wrote in message ... On Monday, 16 June 2014 15:15:26 UTC+1, PAS wrote: No, but in many cases there is far too much regulation of ownership. In which particualar cases would you say are over regulated ? Where I live, in Suffolk County on Long Island. In a nutshell, this is the process I had to go through to get my handgun license and first handgun: 1) Fill out a long application including all previous addresses. 2) Provide three personal references and signed and noarized affadavits from them 3) The references and my employer were all interviewed 4) I had to be fingerprinted & interviewed 5) I was warned of what could disqualify me from being approved. Among them was getting a traffic ticket within the application process timeframe. 6) I was approved after approximately six months from the time I applied 7) I can no purchase a handgun. I went to a gun dealer and made my purchase. But I could not take possession. I had to get a form filled out by the dealer 8) I take the form to the police department and they review the form and then must approve the form and stamp it 9) I take the form back to the dealer and then take possession 10) I have to bring the handgun to the police department for their inspection and then to record the serial number on my license 11) I am only permitted to take the handgun from my home directly to firing range and then directly back home when finished. I cannot make any stops along the way, no exceptions. If I do, I can lose my license. That my friend, is over regulated. Well, you got your gun! Just think what it would be like in the UK. True, in the UK it's impossible to get one. yes of course it is, but where do you get these sort of 'facts' http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/olympics/18911651 I'm not sure what "facts" you're speaking of. Am I wrong that in the UK an "ordinary citizen" like you and I are not permitted to won handguns? |
#216
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/17/2014 9:00 AM, PAS wrote:
"PeterN" wrote in message ... On 6/16/2014 9:04 AM, PAS wrote: "PeterN" wrote in message ... On 6/13/2014 12:31 PM, PAS wrote: "PeterN" wrote in message snip Are you saying that there should e no regulation of ownership of weapons? Discussion of the degree of regulation is a different discussion than whether ownership should be regulated. No I am not. But there is too much regulation in many cases, as I've demonstrated. At least we agree on something. How much is too much, can lead to interesting discussions. I can see the reasonable logic for the regulations you have complained about. Don't we agree on rum raisin too? And Snowflake & (I think,) Magic Fountain in Mattituck. LOL, we were just at the Magic Fountain this past weekend. There is another place in Center Moriches on Montauk Highway - "The Ice Cream Cottage" - that is really great. They make a chocolate fudge ice cream that has those jelly rings in it. It's amazing. You are diabetic. WTF are you doing eating that kind of ice cream! Besides, the only thing that should be added ti ice cream, is small pieces of fruit, or nuts. Adding jelly of peanut butter to ice cream is a sacrilege. -- PeterN |
#217
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/17/2014 11:52 AM, Tony Cooper wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 09:02:54 -0400, "PAS" wrote: I'm not sure what "facts" you're speaking of. Am I wrong that in the UK an "ordinary citizen" like you and I are not permitted to won handguns? Some ordinary citizens are dangerous to themselves and/or others. Seventy year-old L.C. Williams shot himself in the foot yesterday. The Orlandoan was carrying his gun tucked in the waistband of his trousers and it dropped to ground. It discharged wounding Williams. The round ricocheted and did $500 of estimated damages to a Dodge Charger in the supermarket parking lot where the incident occurred. I feel badly for the owner of the Dodge Charger. I trust the insurance company is pursuing Williams to collect damages. He is lucky that he did not shoot off some of his external equipment. -- Jim Silverton (Potomac, MD) Extraneous "not." in Reply To. |
#218
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On 6/17/14 8:02 AM, in article , "PAS" wrote: "Whisky-dave" wrote in message ... On Monday, 16 June 2014 20:37:56 UTC+1, PAS wrote: "James Silverton" wrote in message ... On 6/16/2014 11:48 AM, PAS wrote: "Whisky-dave" wrote in message ... On Monday, 16 June 2014 15:15:26 UTC+1, PAS wrote: No, but in many cases there is far too much regulation of ownership. In which particualar cases would you say are over regulated ? Where I live, in Suffolk County on Long Island. In a nutshell, this is the process I had to go through to get my handgun license and first handgun: 1) Fill out a long application including all previous addresses. 2) Provide three personal references and signed and noarized affadavits from them 3) The references and my employer were all interviewed 4) I had to be fingerprinted & interviewed 5) I was warned of what could disqualify me from being approved. Among them was getting a traffic ticket within the application process timeframe. 6) I was approved after approximately six months from the time I applied 7) I can no purchase a handgun. I went to a gun dealer and made my purchase. But I could not take possession. I had to get a form filled out by the dealer 8) I take the form to the police department and they review the form and then must approve the form and stamp it 9) I take the form back to the dealer and then take possession 10) I have to bring the handgun to the police department for their inspection and then to record the serial number on my license 11) I am only permitted to take the handgun from my home directly to firing range and then directly back home when finished. I cannot make any stops along the way, no exceptions. If I do, I can lose my license. That my friend, is over regulated. Well, you got your gun! Just think what it would be like in the UK. True, in the UK it's impossible to get one. yes of course it is, but where do you get these sort of 'facts' http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/olympics/18911651 I'm not sure what "facts" you're speaking of. Am I wrong that in the UK an "ordinary citizen" like you and I are not permitted to won handguns? Whiskey does not discern between long arms and handguns... |
#219
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"PeterN" wrote in message
... On 6/17/2014 9:00 AM, PAS wrote: "PeterN" wrote in message ... On 6/16/2014 9:04 AM, PAS wrote: "PeterN" wrote in message ... On 6/13/2014 12:31 PM, PAS wrote: "PeterN" wrote in message snip Are you saying that there should e no regulation of ownership of weapons? Discussion of the degree of regulation is a different discussion than whether ownership should be regulated. No I am not. But there is too much regulation in many cases, as I've demonstrated. At least we agree on something. How much is too much, can lead to interesting discussions. I can see the reasonable logic for the regulations you have complained about. Don't we agree on rum raisin too? And Snowflake & (I think,) Magic Fountain in Mattituck. LOL, we were just at the Magic Fountain this past weekend. There is another place in Center Moriches on Montauk Highway - "The Ice Cream Cottage" - that is really great. They make a chocolate fudge ice cream that has those jelly rings in it. It's amazing. You are diabetic. WTF are you doing eating that kind of ice cream! Besides, the only thing that should be added ti ice cream, is small pieces of fruit, or nuts. Adding jelly of peanut butter to ice cream is a sacrilege. I "taste", I don't eat. It's difficult but if I want to live than I have to refrain from eating all that good stuff. My wife gets the ice cream and I'll have a little taste. Some of the places do have sugar-free Italian Ice and I usually get that. |
#220
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"PeterN" wrote in message
... On 6/17/2014 9:00 AM, PAS wrote: "PeterN" wrote in message ... On 6/16/2014 9:04 AM, PAS wrote: "PeterN" wrote in message ... On 6/13/2014 12:31 PM, PAS wrote: "PeterN" wrote in message snip Are you saying that there should e no regulation of ownership of weapons? Discussion of the degree of regulation is a different discussion than whether ownership should be regulated. No I am not. But there is too much regulation in many cases, as I've demonstrated. At least we agree on something. How much is too much, can lead to interesting discussions. I can see the reasonable logic for the regulations you have complained about. Don't we agree on rum raisin too? And Snowflake & (I think,) Magic Fountain in Mattituck. LOL, we were just at the Magic Fountain this past weekend. There is another place in Center Moriches on Montauk Highway - "The Ice Cream Cottage" - that is really great. They make a chocolate fudge ice cream that has those jelly rings in it. It's amazing. You are diabetic. WTF are you doing eating that kind of ice cream! Besides, the only thing that should be added ti ice cream, is small pieces of fruit, or nuts. Adding jelly of peanut butter to ice cream is a sacrilege. I spent a year in Kansas City in 1985. I didn't have diabetes then. There was a place called "Cone-a-copia". They served vanilla ice cream, You'd pick out things from the hundred they offered, such as fresh fruit or Milky Way bars or whatever. They mash it all up into the ice cream and that became the flavor. I guess it's similar to the Dairy Queen Blizzard. I'd usually go with fresh peaches or raspberries. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Giving photogs a bad name? | Eric Stevens | Digital Photography | 9 | May 20th 14 12:43 AM |
Giving photogs a bad name? | Savageduck[_3_] | Digital Photography | 4 | May 18th 14 09:30 PM |
Giving up. | Pablo | Digital Photography | 56 | November 7th 12 01:50 PM |
Giving up | Badasghan Lukacina | APS Photographic Equipment | 0 | August 22nd 04 09:11 AM |
Giving up | Beneactiney Redgrave | Film & Labs | 0 | August 21st 04 10:59 PM |