If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Film scanners?
In article ,
newshound wrote: Film scanning is dead. film is dead. But not forgotten. Which is exactly why it is (sometimes) worth copying before it decays. definitely. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Film scanners?
In article ,
nospam wrote: some things are best done at scan time, such as vuescan's equivalent of digital ice. Digital ICE's in the hardware. The soft do or do not support it. http://www.vividlight.com/articles/1015.htm -- teleportation kills |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Film scanners?
In article , android
wrote: some things are best done at scan time, such as vuescan's equivalent of digital ice. Digital ICE's in the hardware. The soft do or do not support it. digital ice uses infrared light for dust removal, created by applied science fiction (awesome company name), later bought by kodak. vuescan has its own implementation of infrared dust removal. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Film scanners?
In article ,
nospam wrote: In article , android wrote: some things are best done at scan time, such as vuescan's equivalent of digital ice. Digital ICE's in the hardware. The soft do or do not support it. digital ice uses infrared light for dust removal, created by applied science fiction (awesome company name), later bought by kodak. vuescan has its own implementation of infrared dust removal. It does not. Vuescan uses the infrared channel created by the scanner to subtract dust. I.e. ICE... -- teleportation kills |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Film scanners?
In article , android
wrote: some things are best done at scan time, such as vuescan's equivalent of digital ice. Digital ICE's in the hardware. The soft do or do not support it. digital ice uses infrared light for dust removal, created by applied science fiction (awesome company name), later bought by kodak. vuescan has its own implementation of infrared dust removal. It does not. Vuescan uses the infrared channel created by the scanner to subtract dust. I.e. ICE... that's what i said: vuescan has its own implementation of infrared dust removal. such as vuescan's equivalent of digital ice. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Film scanners?
In article ,
nospam wrote: In article , android wrote: some things are best done at scan time, such as vuescan's equivalent of digital ice. Digital ICE's in the hardware. The soft do or do not support it. digital ice uses infrared light for dust removal, created by applied science fiction (awesome company name), later bought by kodak. vuescan has its own implementation of infrared dust removal. It does not. Vuescan uses the infrared channel created by the scanner to subtract dust. I.e. ICE... that's what i said: vuescan has its own implementation of infrared dust removal. such as vuescan's equivalent of digital ice. Your wording suggest that you think that it's not. Whatever... -- teleportation kills |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Film scanners?
In article , android
wrote: some things are best done at scan time, such as vuescan's equivalent of digital ice. Digital ICE's in the hardware. The soft do or do not support it. digital ice uses infrared light for dust removal, created by applied science fiction (awesome company name), later bought by kodak. vuescan has its own implementation of infrared dust removal. It does not. Vuescan uses the infrared channel created by the scanner to subtract dust. I.e. ICE... that's what i said: vuescan has its own implementation of infrared dust removal. such as vuescan's equivalent of digital ice. Your wording suggest that you think that it's not. Whatever... it's not exactly the same. it's equivalent. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Film scanners?
In article ,
nospam wrote: In article , android wrote: some things are best done at scan time, such as vuescan's equivalent of digital ice. Digital ICE's in the hardware. The soft do or do not support it. digital ice uses infrared light for dust removal, created by applied science fiction (awesome company name), later bought by kodak. vuescan has its own implementation of infrared dust removal. It does not. Vuescan uses the infrared channel created by the scanner to subtract dust. I.e. ICE... that's what i said: vuescan has its own implementation of infrared dust removal. such as vuescan's equivalent of digital ice. Your wording suggest that you think that it's not. Whatever... it's not exactly the same. it's equivalent. From the main wiki: "The ICE technology works from within the scanner, so unlike the software-only solutions it does not alter any underlying details of the image. Subsequent to the original Digital ICE technology, which used infrared cleaning, additional image enhancement technologies were marketed by Applied Science Fiction and Kodak under similar and related names, often as part of a suite of compatible technologies. The ICE technology uses a scanner with a pair of light sources, a normal RGB lamp and an infrared (IR) lamp, and scans twice, once with each lamp. The IR lamp detects the dust locations with its unique detection method, and then inpainting is applied based on this data afterwards. The general concept is to subtract the position of scratches and dust from the RGB image." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_ICE -- teleportation kills |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Film scanners?
In article , android
wrote: some things are best done at scan time, such as vuescan's equivalent of digital ice. Digital ICE's in the hardware. The soft do or do not support it. digital ice uses infrared light for dust removal, created by applied science fiction (awesome company name), later bought by kodak. vuescan has its own implementation of infrared dust removal. It does not. Vuescan uses the infrared channel created by the scanner to subtract dust. I.e. ICE... that's what i said: vuescan has its own implementation of infrared dust removal. such as vuescan's equivalent of digital ice. Your wording suggest that you think that it's not. Whatever... it's not exactly the same. it's equivalent. From the main wiki: "The ICE technology works from within the scanner, so unlike the software-only solutions it does not alter any underlying details of the image. Subsequent to the original Digital ICE technology, which used infrared cleaning, additional image enhancement technologies were marketed by Applied Science Fiction and Kodak under similar and related names, often as part of a suite of compatible technologies. The ICE technology uses a scanner with a pair of light sources, a normal RGB lamp and an infrared (IR) lamp, and scans twice, once with each lamp. The IR lamp detects the dust locations with its unique detection method, and then inpainting is applied based on this data afterwards. The general concept is to subtract the position of scratches and dust from the RGB image." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_ICE https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared_cleaning#Method ...Some software algorithms, such as the latest ICE implementation (Nikon Super Coolscan LS-9000 ED with Digital ICE Professional[3]), VueScan's[4] and SilverFast's,[5] claim to use infrared cleaning to find dust spots even when scanning Kodachrome. https://www.hamrick.com/vuescan/html/vuesc31.htm#filterinfraredclean Filter | Infrared clean When an infrared channel is available, use this option to remove dust spots and scratches. It only causes image softening in the immediate vicinity of the spots and scratches, except when this option is set to "Heavy". http://www.silverfast.com/highlights/isrd/en.html ...iSRD utilizes this behavior as follows. The image is scanned two times - the first is the regular RGB scan and the second is the additional infrared scan that captures defects like dust and scratches only. Then the calculative dust and scratch removal takes effect, only where the infrared channel has detected any defects without losing any important details. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Film scanners?
In article ,
nospam wrote: In article , android wrote: some things are best done at scan time, such as vuescan's equivalent of digital ice. Digital ICE's in the hardware. The soft do or do not support it. digital ice uses infrared light for dust removal, created by applied science fiction (awesome company name), later bought by kodak. vuescan has its own implementation of infrared dust removal. It does not. Vuescan uses the infrared channel created by the scanner to subtract dust. I.e. ICE... that's what i said: vuescan has its own implementation of infrared dust removal. such as vuescan's equivalent of digital ice. Your wording suggest that you think that it's not. Whatever... it's not exactly the same. it's equivalent. From the main wiki: "The ICE technology works from within the scanner, so unlike the software-only solutions it does not alter any underlying details of the image. Subsequent to the original Digital ICE technology, which used infrared cleaning, additional image enhancement technologies were marketed by Applied Science Fiction and Kodak under similar and related names, often as part of a suite of compatible technologies. The ICE technology uses a scanner with a pair of light sources, a normal RGB lamp and an infrared (IR) lamp, and scans twice, once with each lamp. The IR lamp detects the dust locations with its unique detection method, and then inpainting is applied based on this data afterwards. The general concept is to subtract the position of scratches and dust from the RGB image." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_ICE https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared_cleaning#Method ...Some software algorithms, such as the latest ICE implementation (Nikon Super Coolscan LS-9000 ED with Digital ICE Professional[3]), VueScan's[4] and SilverFast's,[5] claim to use infrared cleaning to find dust spots even when scanning Kodachrome. https://www.hamrick.com/vuescan/html/vuesc31.htm#filterinfraredclean Filter | Infrared clean When an infrared channel is available, use this option to remove dust spots and scratches. It only causes image softening in the immediate vicinity of the spots and scratches, except when this option is set to "Heavy". http://www.silverfast.com/highlights/isrd/en.html ...iSRD utilizes this behavior as follows. The image is scanned two times - the first is the regular RGB scan and the second is the additional infrared scan that captures defects like dust and scratches only. Then the calculative dust and scratch removal takes effect, only where the infrared channel has detected any defects without losing any important details. An equivalent to Digital ICE would not be that but something else. Vuescan and the others above might have slightly implementations of Digital ICE... https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/equivalent http://www.dictionary.com/browse/implementation -- teleportation kills |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
film scanners | James[_3_] | In The Darkroom | 0 | October 8th 09 08:37 AM |
Film Scanners | Stephen[_2_] | Digital Photography | 1 | July 10th 09 07:56 PM |
Film scanners anyone? | Ted Gibson | Digital Photography | 15 | January 8th 08 04:31 AM |
Film Scanners | Gel | Digital Photography | 20 | February 21st 05 01:25 AM |
M/F film scanners - again? | Rod | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 17 | May 31st 04 04:14 PM |