Billion Pixel Pictures from your point and shoot (not joking).

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...-pictures.html



Eric Stevens

Eric Stevens wrote in
:

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...gapan-pictures
.html



Eric Stevens


Crap.

On Thu, 28 May 2009 20:38:23 -0500, Rich wrote:

Eric Stevens wrote in
:

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...-pictures.html



Eric Stevens


Crap.

Maybe, but see http://www.gigapan.org/index.php

http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~globalconn/gigapan.html

http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/01/post-4/



Eric Stevens

On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 13:11:22 -0700 (PDT), Rich
wrote:

On May 30, 1:44*pm, Evan Platt
wrote:
On Fri, 29 May 2009 12:30:27 +1200, Eric Stevens

wrote:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...gigapan-pictur...

There was a great site with the Obama photos, and comments such as
"Look! A two headed monster!" and a close up of a body with two heads
from the photograph..

I've often marveled at how people have managed to do panoramas and yet
have avoided any obvious sign that it was a stitch-job, especially
when there are active things like humans or cars in the scene.
The reason I said "crap" about the story was that the idea that some
automated shooting platform is some kind of technological miracle is
incredibly silly. Case in point, we've had amateur telescopes that
can home in on and track objects with several arc-second accuracy for
decades. What I do wonder is if anyone in the distant past produced
something like a mechanical device (no electronics) that allowed
this? I saw a 40 year old camera that had a wind-up motor drive the
other day, I thought that was pretty nifty.

I remember the 'Robot' camera from 1954 which used a wind-up drive.
According to http://www.vintagephoto.tv/robotjr.shtml the first Robot
was made in 1934 - 75 years ago.



Eric Stevens

"What I do wonder is if anyone in the distant past produced
something like a mechanical device (no electronics) that allowed
this? "

Don't google panoramic camera. Just keep wondering.

John

On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 13:11:22 -0700 (PDT), Rich
wrote:

On May 30, 1:44*pm, Evan Platt
wrote:
On Fri, 29 May 2009 12:30:27 +1200, Eric Stevens

wrote:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...gigapan-pictur...

There was a great site with the Obama photos, and comments such as
"Look! A two headed monster!" and a close up of a body with two heads
from the photograph..

I've often marveled at how people have managed to do panoramas and yet
have avoided any obvious sign that it was a stitch-job, especially
when there are active things like humans or cars in the scene.
The reason I said "crap" about the story was that the idea that some
automated shooting platform is some kind of technological miracle is
incredibly silly.

I don't think the advance is the automated shooting platform. Its the
ability to later stitch together the photographs taken from that
platform to make an image with more detail than any single image.

Case in point, we've had amateur telescopes that
can home in on and track objects with several arc-second accuracy for
decades. What I do wonder is if anyone in the distant past produced
something like a mechanical device (no electronics) that allowed
this?

Clockwork drives were becoming 'common' in the early 19th century.

I saw a 40 year old camera that had a wind-up motor drive the
other day, I thought that was pretty nifty.



Eric Stevens