A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Photo Equipment » 35mm Photo Equipment
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

$500 reward for identity of image thief



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old April 5th 06, 01:35 PM posted to aus.photo,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default $500 reward for identity of image thief

Offtopic

Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived. This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Apr 12, 7:09 am).


Why are you expiring your posts, douglas? Same reason you remove your
pages - so you can pretend you never did it/said it?

Getting Paradoid are we?


Hab you god a code in da doze?

The fact you used my pictures on your web site and admit it
is an admission of stealing


No it isn't. *Google* has your stuff archived on their website, the
*Wayback Machine* has your stuff archived on theirs... You still
haven't addressed that issue. Or are you suing them too? I bet they
are just as scared as I am. (O:

Changing identities is seemingly not my domain alone. You interchange at
least 2, probably a lot more with your "googling".


I've posted under two names, and have been 100% honest and open about
them. You've posted using over 40 names, and frequently have pretended
to be someone who is "oh-so-impressed" with your work. Not to mention
'Graham Hunt'. (Oops, I did.)

why don't you just publish your identity like I did

Simple. You have made several threats. That gives me a very good
reason not to identify myself to *you*. I, and others have asked you
to post your lawyers name. I'll happily identify myself to a legal
practitioner. What reason could you possibly have for not doing that,
douglas? Call MY bluff. I double dare you.

The simple fact is that the ONLY reason you don't do it, is that you
know you have no case and are in the wrong, and no legaloid would come
near you on this, especially after the threats you made.

So, go on, explain WHY you won't name your lawyers. Just the firm name
will be quite sufficient for me to contact them.

Scared, perhaps? (O:

I am not here for your enjoyment


You *must* be. You embarrass yourself with every post you make, and
clearly serve no other useful purpose. And I'm finding this thread
pretty funny, in a sad sorta way!

Sorry if it's boring others, but nobody is forcing you to read this
far...

  #62  
Old April 5th 06, 04:28 PM posted to aus.photo,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default $500 reward for identity of image thief


"Pete D" wrote in message
...

"Mike Warren" wrote in message
...
D-Mac wrote:
Changing identities is seemingly not my domain alone. You interchange
at least 2, probably a lot more with your "googling". Instead of try
and turn the tables to suit your own dirty deeds, why don't you just
publish your identity like I did (which allowed you to discover so
much about me in the first place) and we'll start the party? Scared,
perhaps?


Doug,

Why don't you just post the name of your lawyers as he requested?
That will do no harm to anyone and may even help you.

-Mike


That would pre-suppose that he actually had some lawyers.


They are also travelling a lot, and are not at his beck and call. :-)


  #63  
Old April 5th 06, 09:01 PM posted to aus.photo,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default $500 reward for identity of image thief

"Pete D" wrote in
:


"Mike Warren" wrote in message

s.com.au...
D-Mac wrote:
Changing identities is seemingly not my domain alone. You
interchange at least 2, probably a lot more with your "googling".
Instead of try and turn the tables to suit your own dirty deeds, why
don't you just publish your identity like I did (which allowed you
to discover so much about me in the first place) and we'll start the
party? Scared, perhaps?


Doug,

Why don't you just post the name of your lawyers as he requested?
That will do no harm to anyone and may even help you.

-Mike


That would pre-suppose that he actually had some lawyers.


Or that the 'lawyers' aren't in reality just upsampled grade school hall
monitors...

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Does Downsampling Reduce Image Quality? Dave Martindale Digital Photography 1 December 22nd 05 07:14 PM
Does Downsampling Reduce Image Quality? Leonard Lehew Digital Photography 0 December 22nd 05 12:47 PM
Image re-sizing Eos Digital Photography 3 April 1st 05 05:59 PM
[SI] XXXI Critique street shooter 35mm Photo Equipment 18 July 5th 04 04:04 PM
Image circle versus stopping down? Nick Zentena Large Format Photography Equipment 11 July 3rd 04 02:40 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2022 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.