If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
an excellent read from the ACLU
PeterN wrote:
On 12/14/2011 12:44 PM, Wolfgang Weisselberg wrote: wrote: On 12/10/2011 1:56 PM, Wolfgang Weisselberg wrote: wrote: On 12/8/2011 3:29 PM, Wolfgang Weisselberg wrote: wrote: On 2011-12-04 19:11:00 -0800, said: Why not, isn't it the capitalists in France causing that problem? Seems to me the US capitalists are far worse. Just wait and see what the German capitalists have in mind for Europe. http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/...wTO_story.html Start behaving more responsible? 'orrible. The poor Greek ... imagine having to have money before spending it! It's the end of the world --- and all that because of US banks. Please explain, in clear English, with supporting facts, exactly why it is the fault of the US banking system. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Late-20...nancial_crisis http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Late-20..._Europe#Greece http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Eu...is#Speculators You have supplied links to the thoughts of others. YOUR interpretation and thoughts are conspicuous by their absence. My interpretation and thoughts aren't needed for well known facts. BTW, you are drastically shifting goal posts. How about you explain, with facts(!), that the US banks had nothing to do with any global recession, and that a recession can never cause economies that need growth to survive to falter. If you manage that, you can become a well-paid ghost writer for some of the politicans further removed from reality. No! I am not going to wade through unexplained links. this paper gets an "F" You're not allowed to grade on shifted goal posts, assuming for a second you *were* capable of grading me in any subject in first place. -Wolfgang You made the positive statement. The burden is on you to supply proof. And I did provide proof. If you wanted everything predigested by me, you should have said so and sent money --- predigestion isn't necessary for grownups and for such frivolous things my time isn't free. You ask me to prove a negative statement that I did not make, I made the positive of that statement through my links. You denied my links could be true/proof/valid, hence you have to disprove my chains of reasoning, for example by proving such statements. If I drastically overestimated your intelligence and reading ability I am sorry --- in that case you'd really need the proof explained by a grown-up. while accusing me of shifting goal posts. Changing from "provide proof" to "provide 'YOUR interpretation and thoughts'" is shifting goalposts. -Wolfgang |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
an excellent read from the ACLU
On 12/23/2011 4:49 PM, Wolfgang Weisselberg wrote:
wrote: On 12/14/2011 12:44 PM, Wolfgang Weisselberg wrote: wrote: On 12/10/2011 1:56 PM, Wolfgang Weisselberg wrote: wrote: On 12/8/2011 3:29 PM, Wolfgang Weisselberg wrote: wrote: On 2011-12-04 19:11:00 -0800, said: Why not, isn't it the capitalists in France causing that problem? Seems to me the US capitalists are far worse. Just wait and see what the German capitalists have in mind for Europe. http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/...wTO_story.html Start behaving more responsible? 'orrible. The poor Greek ... imagine having to have money before spending it! It's the end of the world --- and all that because of US banks. Please explain, in clear English, with supporting facts, exactly why it is the fault of the US banking system. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Late-20...nancial_crisis http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Late-20..._Europe#Greece http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Eu...is#Speculators You have supplied links to the thoughts of others. YOUR interpretation and thoughts are conspicuous by their absence. My interpretation and thoughts aren't needed for well known facts. BTW, you are drastically shifting goal posts. How about you explain, with facts(!), that the US banks had nothing to do with any global recession, and that a recession can never cause economies that need growth to survive to falter. If you manage that, you can become a well-paid ghost writer for some of the politicans further removed from reality. No! I am not going to wade through unexplained links. this paper gets an "F" You're not allowed to grade on shifted goal posts, assuming for a second you *were* capable of grading me in any subject in first place. -Wolfgang You made the positive statement. The burden is on you to supply proof. And I did provide proof. If you wanted everything predigested by me, you should have said so and sent money --- predigestion isn't necessary for grownups and for such frivolous things my time isn't free. I really don't want, or need anything from you. I merely asked you to prove your statement. If you care for anyone to understand your great reasoning, you wold be happy to do so. Obviously, you have no real proof. According to Einstein you don't really understand a concept unless you can explain it to a small child. Your posting miserably fails that test. There has been so much careless snipping that you have lost proper attribution on who said what. Keep up the good work. You ask me to prove a negative statement that I did not make, I made the positive of that statement through my links. You denied my links could be true/proof/valid, hence you have to disprove my chains of reasoning, for example by proving such statements. If I drastically overestimated your intelligence and reading ability I am sorry --- in that case you'd really need the proof explained by a grown-up. while accusing me of shifting goal posts. Changing from "provide proof" to "provide 'YOUR interpretation and thoughts'" is shifting goalposts. Obviously you do not wish to take the offered alternative. -- Peter |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
an excellent read from the ACLU
PeterN wrote:
On 12/23/2011 4:49 PM, Wolfgang Weisselberg wrote: wrote: On 12/14/2011 12:44 PM, Wolfgang Weisselberg wrote: wrote: On 12/10/2011 1:56 PM, Wolfgang Weisselberg wrote: wrote: On 12/8/2011 3:29 PM, Wolfgang Weisselberg wrote: wrote: On 2011-12-04 19:11:00 -0800, said: Why not, isn't it the capitalists in France causing that problem? Seems to me the US capitalists are far worse. Just wait and see what the German capitalists have in mind for Europe. http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/...wTO_story.html Start behaving more responsible? 'orrible. The poor Greek ... imagine having to have money before spending it! It's the end of the world --- and all that because of US banks. Please explain, in clear English, with supporting facts, exactly why it is the fault of the US banking system. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Late-20...nancial_crisis http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Late-20..._Europe#Greece http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Eu...is#Speculators You have supplied links to the thoughts of others. YOUR interpretation and thoughts are conspicuous by their absence. My interpretation and thoughts aren't needed for well known facts. BTW, you are drastically shifting goal posts. How about you explain, with facts(!), that the US banks had nothing to do with any global recession, and that a recession can never cause economies that need growth to survive to falter. If you manage that, you can become a well-paid ghost writer for some of the politicans further removed from reality. No! I am not going to wade through unexplained links. this paper gets an "F" You're not allowed to grade on shifted goal posts, assuming for a second you *were* capable of grading me in any subject in first place. You made the positive statement. The burden is on you to supply proof. And I did provide proof. If you wanted everything predigested by me, you should have said so and sent money --- predigestion isn't necessary for grownups and for such frivolous things my time isn't free. I really don't want, or need anything from you. Really. Then you didn't post | Please explain, in clear English, with supporting facts, exactly why it | is the fault of the US banking system. , that was your evil doppelgänger. And the same for | You have supplied links to the thoughts of others. YOUR interpretation | and thoughts are conspicuous by their absence. , where said doppelgänger expanded his wishes and wants. I merely asked you to prove your statement. But you want nothing, neither proof nor MY interpretation and thoughts. If you care for anyone to understand your great reasoning, you wold be happy to do so. I *don't* care for stupid or lazy (or both) people, full stop. If you're too stupid or too lazy to read a couple hundred words and engage your brain enough to be able to at least formulate questions based on what you read, that's not my fault and I won't waste time on you. I'd rather talk reason to a rock as it's more likely to react. Obviously, you have no real proof. Sticking your fingers in your ears and going "la-la I can't hear you" doesn't constitute me having no real proof. According to Einstein you don't really understand a concept unless you can explain it to a small child. I'll explain everything to you in 4 syllable sentences once you get your parents to fork over an appropriate sum for handling a mentally retarded, nasty, evil, spoiled brat. Your posting miserably fails that test. This group is for grown ups. There has been so much careless snipping that you have lost proper attribution on who said what. Keep up the good work. Sure, that's it! Attack the messenger! Clever. Now, how about some proof for your claim --- proof by the standards you yourself raised? Guess you'll chicken out. You ask me to prove a negative statement that I did not make, I made the positive of that statement through my links. You denied my links could be true/proof/valid, hence you have to disprove my chains of reasoning, for example by proving such statements. If I drastically overestimated your intelligence and reading ability I am sorry --- in that case you'd really need the proof explained by a grown-up. while accusing me of shifting goal posts. Changing from "provide proof" to "provide 'YOUR interpretation and thoughts'" is shifting goalposts. Obviously you do not wish to take the offered alternative. No, I will *not* kill myself because a small child is upset that it doesn't get everything prechewed. -Wolfgang |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
an excellent read from the ACLU | Robert Coe | Digital SLR Cameras | 13 | January 15th 12 05:06 PM |
an excellent read from the ACLU | Ray Fischer | Digital SLR Cameras | 3 | December 24th 11 08:28 PM |
an excellent read from the ACLU | Ray Fischer | 35mm Photo Equipment | 0 | December 24th 11 08:16 AM |
an excellent read from the ACLU | Pete Stavrakoglou | Digital SLR Cameras | 0 | December 22nd 11 01:11 PM |
an excellent read from the ACLU | Robert Coe | Digital SLR Cameras | 3 | December 19th 11 07:40 PM |