If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Technology idea
Hi - if this seems like something from the lunatic sector, please ignore and
excuse the post. If this is a "great idea" that makes someone rich, all the better for the community. Why can't someone invent a digital sensor/storage as follows: Sensor roughly the same size as 35 mm negative, attached by micro wire to main body of the unit that contains the power source and storage. The main unit would be the form fit of a 35mm film can. The entire unit would be deployed in a standard 35mm camera. The main unit would have to have some logic that tells it to reset (probably after a manual reset on the can) upon sensing "darkness" for a specified period of time. After that, it would record exposures from the 35mm lens/shutter. Of course, there would be no preview function, but it would allow one to use a legacy 35mm as a digital camera. Again, just looking for comments. thanks, john |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Technology idea
"JAL" writes:
Why can't someone invent a digital sensor/storage as follows: Sensor roughly the same size as 35 mm negative, attached by micro wire to main body of the unit that contains the power source and storage. The main unit would be the form fit of a 35mm film can. Hehheh, history repeats itself. That was a vaporware product for several years in the early digicam era. I forget what it was called but it was delayed so many times it became a running joke. When a prototype was finally shown, it was crap. There's no point to it now. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Technology idea
Paul Rubin wrote:
"JAL" writes: Why can't someone invent a digital sensor/storage as follows: Sensor roughly the same size as 35 mm negative, attached by micro wire to main body of the unit that contains the power source and storage. The main unit would be the form fit of a 35mm film can. Hehheh, history repeats itself. That was a vaporware product for several years in the early digicam era. I forget what it was called but it was delayed so many times it became a running joke. When a prototype was finally shown, it was crap. There's no point to it now. Silicon film? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Technology idea
Paul Rubin wrote:
"JAL" writes: Why can't someone invent a digital sensor/storage as follows: Sensor roughly the same size as 35 mm negative, attached by micro wire to main body of the unit that contains the power source and storage. The main unit would be the form fit of a 35mm film can. Hehheh, history repeats itself. That was a vaporware product for several years in the early digicam era. I forget what it was called but it was delayed so many times it became a running joke. When a prototype was finally shown, it was crap. There's no point to it now. Silicon Film, I believe. It's not a bad idea, but the phrase "easier said than done" comes to mind. Of course, miniaturization of electronics and sensor quality gets better all the time. Maybe five or ten years down the road, some bright electrical engineer with a fondness for spotmatics will come up with a design that actually works in the real world. - Matt |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Technology idea
"JAL" wrote:
Why can't someone invent a digital sensor/storage as follows: Sensor roughly the same size as 35 mm negative, attached by micro wire to main body of the unit that contains the power source and storage. The main unit would be the form fit of a 35mm film can. http://web.archive.org/web/200006191...liconfilm.com/ -- Eric http://canid.com/ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Technology idea
"JAL" wrote in message ... Hi - if this seems like something from the lunatic sector, please ignore and excuse the post. If this is a "great idea" that makes someone rich, all the better for the community. Why can't someone invent a digital sensor/storage as follows: Sensor roughly the same size as 35 mm negative, attached by micro wire to main body of the unit that contains the power source and storage. The main unit would be the form fit of a 35mm film can. The entire unit would be deployed in a standard 35mm camera. The main unit would have to have some logic that tells it to reset (probably after a manual reset on the can) upon sensing "darkness" for a specified period of time. After that, it would record exposures from the 35mm lens/shutter. Of course, there would be no preview function, but it would allow one to use a legacy 35mm as a digital camera. Again, just looking for comments. thanks, john Already been done! For years professional photographers have been using digital backs on thier expensive film SLR, and medium format cameras. http://www.leica-camera.com/produkte...l/index_e.html http://www.betterlight.com/ **SS** |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Technology idea
JAL wrote:
Hi - if this seems like something from the lunatic sector, please ignore and excuse the post. If this is a "great idea" that makes someone rich, all the better for the community. Why can't someone invent a digital sensor/storage as follows: Sensor roughly the same size as 35 mm negative, attached by micro wire to main body of the unit that contains the power source and storage. The main unit would be the form fit of a 35mm film can. The entire unit would be deployed in a standard 35mm camera. Nope. Sorry. A digital sensor is far too thick to fit into a 35mm camera. -- Ray Fischer |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Technology idea
"Paul Rubin" wrote in message ... "JAL" writes: Why can't someone invent a digital sensor/storage as follows: Sensor roughly the same size as 35 mm negative, attached by micro wire to main body of the unit that contains the power source and storage. The main unit would be the form fit of a 35mm film can. Hehheh, history repeats itself. That was a vaporware product for several years in the early digicam era. I forget what it was called but it was delayed so many times it became a running joke. When a prototype was finally shown, it was crap. There's no point to it now. The FartWare product was the Imagek aka Silicon Film that first appeared on the Internet in 1997 *Fartware is vapourware, but with a stink to it! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Canon G6 Successor...any idea on timeframe or specs? | Bob Hayden | Digital Photography | 3 | March 12th 05 07:32 AM |
need advice Digital camera business idea | john smith | Digital Photo Equipment For Sale | 9 | October 11th 04 04:27 AM |
Extended warranties - good or bad idea? | ZeeExSixAre | Digital Photography | 30 | July 18th 04 09:12 PM |
[SI] Because I feel obligated... | Al Denelsbeck | 35mm Photo Equipment | 7 | July 5th 04 04:14 PM |
Digital camera design idea | Justin Thyme | Digital Photography | 10 | June 26th 04 11:45 PM |