If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Guth Venus is way more alive than Usenet
"John McWilliams" wrote in message
Could be the x=posting. F-U set. I have not a good idea as to whatever Usenet "x=posting" represents. I'm fairly certain it has something MI/NSA by nature, and it's otherwise not likely intended as a good thing. If MI/NSA spooks and moles are using "x=posting" as a stealth method of pestering whomever they like, and/or of infomercial-spamming humanity for all it's worth, as such there's no way that our lord all-knowing GOOGLE doesn't know exactly from where each and every one of those x=posting packets emerge from, if not from within their own cloak and dagger ranks. - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Guth Venus is way more alive than Usenet
Brad Guth wrote: "John McWilliams" wrote in message Could be the x=posting. F-U set. I have not a good idea as to whatever Usenet "x=posting" represents. I'm fairly certain it has something MI/NSA by nature, and it's otherwise not likely intended as a good thing. If MI/NSA spooks and moles are using "x=posting" as a stealth method of pestering whomever they like, and/or of infomercial-spamming humanity for all it's worth, as such there's no way that our lord all-knowing GOOGLE doesn't know exactly from where each and every one of those x=posting packets emerge from, if not from within their own cloak and dagger ranks. - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG Mr. Guth, You are living proof that the Internet brings out all the fruits and nuts. Best wishes Bill in Lake Charles, LA |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Guth Venus is way more alive than Usenet
Phil wrote: Just out of interest, when was the last time you has sex? "Brad Guth" wrote in message news:9d26ff3a1b92bd3cdabc890a95c16bf8.49644@mygat e.mailgate.org... Oh, I'll bet he has a _lot_ of sex. Reading his postings, I don't think I ever ran into someone who was so completely and thoroughly ****ed. :-) Pat |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Guth Venus is way more alive than Usenet
"Bill K" wrote in message
ups.com Mr. Guth, You are living proof that the Internet brings out all the fruits and nuts. That's odd, because you're the living proof that I've been correct about this anti-think-tank of a Usenet from hell that sucks and blows all along. It's Usenet rusemasters and/or Third Reich minions like yourself that has us at war with damn near half the world, and there's obviously more to come. - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Guth Venus is way more alive than Usenet
As you can tell, the Usenet MIB spooks and moles are out in force. Soon
it likely will become Usenet WW-III. Therefore I'll try an updated effort at delivering this message once again. You'd certainly never know by way of the usual anti-think-tank of this Usenet of infomercial standards, but in spite of their obvious ESA/(Venus Express) and "Guth Venus" banishment, there's all sorts of new and improved science arriving about Venus, all of which further supports the geothermal nature of our extremely nearby and rather toasty Venus as being one seriously hot place for the likes of us wussy humans to live. The facts of that thick and terribly buoyant soup of an atmosphere being so extra toasty by day and otherwise cooling off rather nicely by night (extracting roughly 15% more thermal energy than solar contributed) does not significantly alter the geothermally heated surface situation by day or night, as being from where most of that environmental thermal energy has been derived from, that's still in the newish planetology phase of having been radiating and otherwise continually outgassing and thereby unavoidably heating the Venusian atmosphere as primarily from the bottom up. ESA's thermal imaging and other planetology science results from Venus Express, with lots more to come. http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/obj...objectid=39432 For starters, we have had fairly old science as to appreciating the surface geothermal anomaly differentials of what that physically active environment as having 225~240 K has to work with: http://www.lpi.usra.edu/science/kief...oebe_fig2b.gif Once the Venus EXPRESS PFS instrument is rebooted/activated and contributing in depth of better thermal imaging resolution that should penetrate down to the surface, whereas this is when we'll get another good deal of updated science as pertaining towards mapping those multiple hot spots or active volcanic zones of geothermal lava and/or of various surface mud flows, possibly sufficient resolution as to re-identify the active area associated with the 'Fluid Arch'. Therefore, Venus is simply not offering the exact same surface temperature upon each and every square meter of that newish planetary environment, and there's certainly absolute loads of what's local and of essentially unlimited/renewable energy that's available to work with. There's also absolutely nothing technical that's entirely insurmountable on behalf of other intelligent life having existed/coexisted, whereas there's only the ongoing bigotry, greed and arrogance of Usenet naysayism that's continually hard at work of their status quo wagging-thy-dogs to death, of otherwise imposing as much collateral damage and carnage of the innocent without a stitch of remorse to boot is what we should expect. The image of a Venusian township or community of those extremely large and I think impressive structures, as having their perfectly rational configuration of Venusian infrastructure, along with having their nearby tarmac that's fairly complex, isn't a joke. But since most Usenet folks and official rusemasters tend to refuse to believe my image processing and banish all subsequent interpretations, or for that matter of whatever anyone else happens to perceive as being potentially artificial gets their official banishment or as much mainstream status quo flak and/or torment as this Usenet from naysay hell can muster (yet they'll believe each and every NASA/Apollo image w/o question and/or without a stitch of physics or any other hard-science in support thereof) is why I'm starting off by posting the raw NASA/Magellan image link, which so happens to contain those terrific items of interest, that which I've spoken of and having requested honest contributions from all that's worth sharing for the past seven years. Here's the original composite of an official Magellan image at roughly 225 m and 36 image confirming looks/pixel: http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hi...c115s095_1.gif If I'm not asking too much, please take another unbiased/(open mindset) 1:1 look-see, and tell us whatever it is that you honestly think, and please do share as to the observationology and/or planetology basis of whatever's encharge of your best SWAG or investigative mindset. If you can't manage or otherwise refuse to accomplish the digital PhotoShop enlargements, in which case I'll provide my best efforts as to sharing the step by step of whatever photographic enlargement/(zoom-in) process has to offer, and then I'll share the enlargement results of what I've managed to accomplish, which unfortunately isn't going to be 10% as good as what our nondisclosure NIMA team has to offer, and it shouldn't even be nearly as good as whatever yourself and your software of whatever PhotoShop can deliver. - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Guth Venus is way more alive than Usenet
Brad Guth wrote:
OK, who read past here? |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Guth Venus is way more alive than Usenet
In article
lgate.org, "Brad Guth" wrote: You'd certainly never know by way of Usenet infomercial standards, but there's all sorts of new and improved science arriving about Venus, all of which further supports the geothermal nature of our extremely nearby and rather toasty Venus as being one seriously hot place for the likes of us wussy humans to live. The facts of that thick and terribly buoyant soup of an atmosphere being so extra toasty by day and otherwise cooling off rather nicely by night (extracting roughly 15% more thermal energy than solar contributed) does not significantly alter the geothermally heated surface situation by day or night, as being from where most of that environmental thermal energy has been derived from, that's still in the newish planetology phase of having been radiating and otherwise continually outgassing and thereby unavoidably heating the Venusian atmosphere as primarily from the bottom up. Thermal imaging and other planetology science results from Venus Express http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/obj...objectid=39432 For starters, we have had fairly old science as to appreciating the surface geothermal anomaly differentials of what that physical environment as having 225~240 K has to work with: http://www.lpi.usra.edu/science/kief...oebe_fig2b.gif Once the Venus EXPRESS PFS instrument is rebooted/activated and contributing in depth of better thermal imaging resolution that should penetrate down to the surface, whereas this is when we'll get another good deal of updated science as pertaining to those multiple hot spots or active volcanic zones of geothermal lava and/or of various surface mud flows, possibly sufficient resolution as to re-identify the active area associated with the 'Fluid Arch'. Therefore, Venus is simply not offering the exact same surface temperature upon each and every square meter of that newish environment, and there's certainly absolute loads of what's local and of essentially unlimited/renewable energy available to work with. There's also absolutely nothing technical that's entirely insurmountable on behalf of other intelligent life having existed/coexisted, whereas there's only the ongoing bigotry, greed and arrogance of Usenet naysayism that's continually hard at work of their wagging-thy-dogs to death. The image of a Venusian township or community of those extremely large structures, as having their perfectly rational configuration of infrastructure, along with having their nearby tarmac that's fairly complex, isn't a joke. But since most Usenet folks and official rusemasters tend to refuse to believe my image processing and banish all subsequent interpretations, or for that matter of whatever anyone else happens to perceive as being potentially artificial gets their official banishment or as much mainstream status quo flak and/or torment as this Usenet from naysay hell can muster (yet they'll believe each and every NASA/Apollo image w/o question and/or without a stitch of physics or any other hard-science in support thereof) is why I'm starting off by posting the raw NASA/Magellan image link, which so happens to contain those terrific items of interest, that which I've spoken of and having requested honest contributions from all that's worth sharing for the past seven years. Here's the original composite and official Magellan image at roughly 225 m and 36 looks/pixel: http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hi...c115s095_1.gif If I'm not asking too much, please take another unbiased/(open mindset) 1:1 look-see, and tell us whatever you honestly think, and please do share as to the observationology and/or planetology basis of whatever's encharge of your best SWAG or investigative mindset. If you can't manage or otherwise refuse to accomplish the digital PhotoShop enlargements, in which case I'll offer my best efforts as to sharing the step by step of whatever photographic enlargement/(zoom-in) process, and then I'll share the results of what I've managed to accomplish, which unfortunately isn't going to be 10% as good as what our nondisclosure NIMA team has to offer. - Brad Guth yeah but I prefer shooting sunsets and the cloudcover seems to rule that out so, no I'm not going to move there. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Guth Venus is way more alive than Usenet
i feel your pain i would also like a 1d mark II but can't afford one
For starters, we have had fairly old science as to appreciating the surface geothermal anomaly differentials of what that physical environment as having 225~240 K has to work with: |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Guth Venus is way more alive than Usenet
"Stewy" wrote in message
yeah but I prefer shooting sunsets and the cloudcover seems to rule that out so, no I'm not going to move there. There's still sunsets on Venus, and I'd bet quite colorful getting through those complex cloud formations of such multiple layers of interesting acidic elements. Especially if having the extended spectrum of a good CCD (deposited on diamond of course) at your disposal. There's 2650 w/m2 to start off with, and that clouded environment is actually relatively transparent to the 425 nm (+/- 25 nm) spectrum, and there might even be a touch of 375 nm getting through. The only problem is the Venusian day is more like that of an extended season of day or night, which is also a good thing because, each sunrise or sunset is good for hosting such events for several of our days at a time. It's also good to know that via a rigid airship you can basically get yourself the hell out of town before that sunshine makes the local environment that much worse off. - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Guth Venus is way more alive than Usenet
"picture taker" wrote in message
oups.com i feel your pain i would also like a 1d mark II but can't afford one I think a Venusian certified "1d mark II" might run either of us a cool $million, if not more. - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
STOP USENET GANGS--HELP THE "GOTI PROJECT" | corinne | 35mm Photo Equipment | 5 | November 13th 05 02:08 PM |
[OT, Meta] What Is Public Usenet White? | Robert McClenon | Digital Photography | 10 | May 3rd 05 02:30 AM |
[OT, Meta] What Is Public Usenet White? | Robert McClenon | 35mm Photo Equipment | 10 | May 3rd 05 02:30 AM |
Fuji S2 and Metz 44 Mz-2 Flash | elchief | In The Darkroom | 3 | April 7th 04 10:20 AM |