If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] P: Commander Kinsey - A good judge of character? :)
Diesel
Fpc0X5SgVZ.28E Thu, 21 Feb 2019 02:45:37 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: "Commander Kinsey" news 22:33:32 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On Fri, 08 Feb 2019 07:33:37 -0000, Diesel wrote: "Commander Kinsey" news 17:02:28 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: No, you just admitted to being a good hacker. That's like saying "I'm an excellent bank robber". I fail to see the comparison, but, thanks for the compliment. I consider myself to be fairly good at it too. I should be, considering how long I've been doing it. Both are despicable things to do. To anyone with a conscience that is. Before I waste any more time on this subject with you, I'd like for yuo to provide me your understanding of what the word hacker means. I'd like to be able to say write that I want to make sure we're on the same page here, but, I'm reasonably certain we are not and i'm seeking confirmation at this point. Please don't cheat and google/wikipedia a copy/paste job. I want you to tell me in your own words what you think the word hacker means. Do you still think David is a good honest guy? Yes, I'm a good judge of character. Damn. That's going to make another fine tagline! Thank you very much!!! There are none so blind as those who cannot see. Oh? Have a look see at this then: David recently wrote this: Message-ID: I proceeded to answer other questions you provided in the same email asking about it. You indicated no issue with me, no accusation of my being a 'bad guy' until years later, here on usenet. That's correct. I didn't let on that you were a target and I'd scored a bullseye. Other than your known dishonesty, is there a particular reason you aren't sharing the entire contents of your inquiry leading up to that paste? I'm totally honest with good guys. What else would you like me to tell any newbies about you? *** end paste To which I responded: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=155063392200 I'm totally honest with good guys. What else would you like me to tell any newbies about you? You're about as honest as you are sober, David. Say you were setting me up the entire time. Does that mean (as I accused you of) that you tried to provide a google street map view of my house on purpose, then? And when you met in person with Aardvark and discussed the matter, were you knowingly lying right to his face? Are you now admitting that every attempt you made to get to know me, to be my friend, etc via email were all lies? Are you also admitting that you told various lies to GM to have a cease fire on jenn arranged? Under normal conditions, that would void the agreement. Lucky for jenn, I see no reason for her to have any issues because you're a dishonest drunkard. Are you also admitting that you've told lies concerning other peace arrangements in play? Are you also admitting that I cannot trust a single thing you write as being in any way truthful? So have you been lying for years on usenet or the emails, or both, then David? Any reason you neglected to respond to this, days ago, David? You've been active on usenet and the www. Are you avoiding the reply because, you don't have any answers to the questions that'll give anyone the idea you're a "good guy"; rather, it'll only help to confirm (not that anyone needs further confirmation at this point) that you are in all actuality, a dangerous nutjob stalker amongst other things, none of which are good. You can claim to be something you're not (a good guy) all you like, David. It doesn't hide what you actually are (a bad guy). I already covered the part of the post he's never (afaik) shared when he's out to remind me of something I wrote, but, I'll do it again, just to drive that point home. As I said, I like to be thorough. This is the remainder of the post that David only shared a section of, until recently when he screwed up (he didn't double check, I'm sure of it) and provided the url to the post in full. Begin: I am taking the time to write you all this not because you are the only VXer "out there" but because I have a feeling that you will understand what I am trying to say and who knows... you may even take the time to think about what I am saying. I understand what your trying to say, and I'm sorry if one of my viruses ever does cause you harm. Your clearly one of the few people on this planet that doesn't just make my skin crawl. *** end snippit paste So much for that good judge of character you claim to have. Just in case you missed this, I figured i'd share it with your favorite hangout too. [g] -- Confucius say: "Man who sit on tack get point!" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] P: Commander Kinsey - A good judge of character? :)
On Sun, 3 Mar 2019 04:36:51 -0000 (UTC), Diesel
wrote: "Commander Kinsey" is just another nym BD stole. The original used to post drunken crap in the alt.repair groups, until he was "shooed" away. BD even forgot to munge his headers in a post, when he panicked realizing he could go to jail for one of his crimes. Here's the real BD: https://web.archive.org/web/20190221143021/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php I'd probably drink as much as he does if I was kicked out of the navy, let my son die, had man-tits and was such an utter failure in life. HTH []'s PS to the Mac guy that keeps pointing out the follow-ups are off topic. Please filter on "OT". I usually remember to put it in when BD starts a new phishing thread. Problem solved. -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012 Nineteen Eighty-Four was a work of FICTION !!!! - Orwell |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] P: Commander Kinsey - A good judge of character? :)
On Sun, 03 Mar 2019 12:39:12 -0000, Shadow wrote:
On Sun, 3 Mar 2019 04:36:51 -0000 (UTC), Diesel wrote: "Commander Kinsey" is just another nym BD stole. The original used to post drunken crap in the alt.repair groups, until he was "shooed" away. Bull****. I post in there whenever I like, I don't care if people disagree with me, it's just a home repair group ffs. And I'm not David. I live 500 miles away and have never met him. I have never observed a post using this name that isn't myself. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] P: Commander Kinsey - A good judge of character? :)
On 3/3/19 PDT 5:36 AM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sun, 03 Mar 2019 12:39:12 -0000, Shadow wrote: On Sun, 3 Mar 2019 04:36:51 -0000 (UTC), Diesel wrote: ****"Commander Kinsey" is just another nym BD stole. The original used to post drunken crap in the alt.repair groups, until he was "shooed" away. Bull****.* I post in there whenever I like, I don't care if people disagree with me, it's just a home repair group ffs.* And I'm not David.* I live 500 miles away and have never met him.* I have never observed a post using this name that isn't myself. Xpost |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] P: Commander Kinsey - A good judge of character? :)
Shadow
Sun, 03 Mar 2019 12:39:12 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On Sun, 3 Mar 2019 04:36:51 -0000 (UTC), Diesel wrote: "Commander Kinsey" is just another nym BD stole. The original used to post drunken crap in the alt.repair groups, until he was "shooed" away. Commander Kinsey is a more recent nym for the oddball that I know from home.repair, but, I really doubt the individual is another sock of Davids. They've displayed a slightly higher level of intelligence than David has been able to muster on one of his best days. That and well, the other individual is fairly honest about their love to troll. Nothing inherently malicious about their trolling efforts. The same cannot be said for david brooks aka boaterdave aka a pile of other nyms. BD even forgot to munge his headers in a post, when he panicked realizing he could go to jail for one of his crimes. [g] Was this the threat to another posters children with a handgun, or something else? Here's the real BD: https://web.archive.org/web/20190221143021/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php I'd probably drink as much as he does if I was kicked out of the navy, let my son die, had man-tits and was such an utter failure in life. That's a very elegant way to put it. HTH []'s PS to the Mac guy that keeps pointing out the follow-ups are off topic. Please filter on "OT". I usually remember to put it in when BD starts a new phishing thread. Problem solved. Ayep. -- Barium: what you do with dead chemists. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] P: Commander Kinsey - A good judge of character? :)
David in Devon news:68SeE.19291$Ci5.10670
@fx26.fr7 Sun, 03 Mar 2019 15:10:56 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 03/03/2019 13:36, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Sun, 03 Mar 2019 12:39:12 -0000, Shadow wrote: On Sun, 3 Mar 2019 04:36:51 -0000 (UTC), Diesel wrote: ****"Commander Kinsey" is just another nym BD stole. The original used to post drunken crap in the alt.repair groups, until he was "shooed" away. Bull****.* I post in there whenever I like, I don't care if people disagree with me, it's just a home repair group ffs.* And I'm not David.* I live 500 miles away and have never met him.* I have never observed a post using this name that isn't myself. As you've noticed, 'Shadow' is a *LIAR*. I didn't see any effort to be intentionally dishonest, that is to lie. Mistakes aren't always lies, david. What you do is lie; what shadow has done, imo, was made a mistake in mistaking the kinsey persona as another of your socks. I don't believe that to be the case. They've demonstrated a higher level of intelligence. Ask him about HIS son. Why do you assume that when someone will not answer personal questions from you, that you can somehow get another person to ask the same question(s) on your behalf? What an idiot you are, david. -- Cats must terrorize their older and less active feline roommate. His tail is a toy. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] P: Commander Kinsey - A good judge of character? :)
On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 13:07:32 +0000, David in Devon
wrote: Sadly, the Commander doesn't much care for anyone but himself. Which "commander" are you referring to ? The one in this great article ? https://web.archive.org/web/20190221143021/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php If he is the one in the article above, that's the first *true* thing you've said in decades, you drunken, man-titted navy dropout. []'s -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012 Nineteen Eighty-Four was a work of FICTION !!!! - Orwell |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] P: Commander Kinsey - A good judge of character? :)
On Tue, 05 Mar 2019 13:07:32 -0000, David in Devon wrote:
On 05/03/2019 04:29, Diesel wrote: David in Devon news:68SeE.19291$Ci5.10670 @fx26.fr7 Sun, 03 Mar 2019 15:10:56 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 03/03/2019 13:36, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Sun, 03 Mar 2019 12:39:12 -0000, Shadow wrote: On Sun, 3 Mar 2019 04:36:51 -0000 (UTC), Diesel wrote: "Commander Kinsey" is just another nym BD stole. The original used to post drunken crap in the alt.repair groups, until he was "shooed" away. Bull****. I post in there whenever I like, I don't care if people disagree with me, it's just a home repair group ffs. And I'm not David. I live 500 miles away and have never met him. I have never observed a post using this name that isn't myself. As you've noticed, 'Shadow' is a *LIAR*. I didn't see any effort to be intentionally dishonest, that is to lie. Mistakes aren't always lies, david. What you do is lie; what shadow has done, imo, was made a mistake in mistaking the kinsey persona as another of your socks. I don't believe that to be the case. They've demonstrated a higher level of intelligence. Shadow *LIED*. I was *NOT* "kicked out of the navy". Ask him about HIS son. Why do you assume that when someone will not answer personal questions from you, that you can somehow get another person to ask the same question(s) on your behalf? What an idiot you are, david. Sadly, the Commander doesn't much care for anyone but himself. I had a notion that he wouldn't much care about Shadow's disabled boy. Seems I was right. :-( Sorry? I know nothing about his son, or him. Why should I get involved in everything? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] P: Commander Kinsey - A good judge of character? :)
David in Devon
news alt.computer.workshop, wrote: I didn't see any effort to be intentionally dishonest, that is to lie. Mistakes aren't always lies, david. What you do is lie; what shadow has done, imo, was made a mistake in mistaking the kinsey persona as another of your socks. I don't believe that to be the case. They've demonstrated a higher level of intelligence. Shadow *LIED*. Due to what you wrote previously, nothing you write can be accepted as the truth at face value. You have no credit. Collateral is required. I was *NOT* "kicked out of the navy". Were you lying about being kicked out for being a danger to yourself, your equipment, essentially, everyone but the enemy - then or are you trying to rewrite this part of your known history now too? Ask him about HIS son. Why do you assume that when someone will not answer personal questions from you, that you can somehow get another person to ask the same question(s) on your behalf? What an idiot you are, david. Sadly, the Commander doesn't much care for anyone but himself. I had a notion that he wouldn't much care about Shadow's disabled boy. Seems I was right. :-( Awe. Just when the two of you were hitting it off you have to go and write such a nasty thing about them. I'm sure if you had any personal information on Char or Shadow, you'd be using it as often as possible by now. Suffice to say, the only confirmed, real, authentic Hacker you've ever met is myself. And the reason my real name is well known is because I willingly and knowingly confirmed who I was and outed myself when I released BugHunter. It ****es you off to no end because due to your stalking efforts prior to your initial email, You know I'm the real deal, an authentic Hacker with a proven track record; not some blow hard bull**** artist like so many infact are. You've encountered a single real life, Hacker in your entire life, and despite years of trying on your part, you've never succesfully conned me into helping you do anything nefarious to any of your enemies or other stalking victims, despite knowing for a fact, I could do everything you've asked of me, generally with ease. That's what ****es you off. That's why you've been 'after me' for years. The skillsets I possess are exactly what you've been trying to find someone with for years. You found someone, me, but, I've continually refused to help you do shady **** to other people. And you still think, after all this time, your efforts to slime and besmirch me are somehow at some point, going to convince me to help you out. They won't. All you've accomplished is a spot on my ****list. Instead of helping you stalk others, I proudly warn people about your intentions and cost you victims as I do so. I sleep well at night knowing that my refusal to assist you keeps others safer from you. -- Money is the root of all evil; everyone needs roots! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] P: Commander Kinsey - A good judge of character? :)
"Commander Kinsey"
news GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On Tue, 05 Mar 2019 13:07:32 -0000, David in Devon wrote: Sadly, the Commander doesn't much care for anyone but himself. I had a notion that he wouldn't much care about Shadow's disabled boy. Seems I was right. :-( Sorry? I know nothing about his son, or him. Why should I get involved in everything? Slow eh? David isn't looking to be friends with you, stupid ****. He's looking to USE you. What he wrote about you above is how the sliming begins if he determines you won't do as he wants, easily. This is how he herds you back into his line. G You'll either comply or join the rest of us on his list of people he's tried to **** over in some way shape or form. -- By the time rules are is needed, it's already too late. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A good judge of character? :) | Diesel[_3_] | Digital Photography | 185 | January 1st 20 07:18 AM |