If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
color of spring
On Sun, 22 May 2016 22:21:12 -0400, nospam
wrote: In article , Eric Stevens wrote: note that the chart only goes up to 500ms, as anything beyond that would be negligible. That's for someone expecting something to happen and mentally prepared to react as soon as it does. anyone who is driving should *always* be expecting something to happen and mentally prepared to react as soon as it does. So you drive around expecting your foot brake to fail. At the same time you are prepared for red light runners. How do you cope with that while watching for approaching traffic crossing over into your lane? i'm prepared for anything that might happen. Your nerves must be totally frazzled. not at all. and people wonder why there are so many collisions. **** happens when you least expect it, whether it's mechanical failure or a kid running into the street or an idiot running a red light. How do reconcile "least expect it" with "should *always* be expecting something to happen"? they're the same thing. Haw! You are 'least expecting' it, i.e. not expecting it, at the same time you are always expecting it. when it does, you don't have time to decide what to do. a split second can make all the difference and you don't get a second chance either. The SAE figures are based on John Doe trundling down the highway and having a dangerous situation suddenly presented to him without warning. The first thing John Doe has to do is to recognise that he is being presented with a situation to which he has to react. Only after that does the reaction time start running. john doe needs to stop driving, as he's putting everyone in danger. So you expect instaneous recognition of an unexpected hazard? i'd like that to be the case, but realistically, i don't expect it from others. Even if you are a digital robot you will not be able to literally instantaneously recognise anything, whether a hazard or not. Would you be better able to grasp the concept if I used terms like 'delay' or 'latency'? That's why I referred to it as 'perception/reaction' time. If you are driving down the road and have cause to brake and then, in the midst of braking you have your brake system fail, you first have to perceive that you have a situation to react to. You then have to work out what to do about it and react. I would expect that it would take you at least 2 seconds from brake failure to you applying the parking brake. not for me it won't. the moment i apply the brakes and nothing happens is the moment i engage the emergency brake and/or downshift in at most, a half-second. How do you change gear and apply the parking brake simultaneously with the same hand? who said simultaneously? obviously one will precede the other. the point is that there isn't a 2 second delay to figure out what to do and when. it's an automatic response. it's a reflex. Aah. You _are_ an automata. -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
color of spring
In article , Eric Stevens
wrote: and people wonder why there are so many collisions. **** happens when you least expect it, whether it's mechanical failure or a kid running into the street or an idiot running a red light. How do reconcile "least expect it" with "should *always* be expecting something to happen"? they're the same thing. Haw! You are 'least expecting' it, i.e. not expecting it, at the same time you are always expecting it. is english not your native language? when it does, you don't have time to decide what to do. a split second can make all the difference and you don't get a second chance either. The SAE figures are based on John Doe trundling down the highway and having a dangerous situation suddenly presented to him without warning. The first thing John Doe has to do is to recognise that he is being presented with a situation to which he has to react. Only after that does the reaction time start running. john doe needs to stop driving, as he's putting everyone in danger. So you expect instaneous recognition of an unexpected hazard? i'd like that to be the case, but realistically, i don't expect it from others. Even if you are a digital robot you will not be able to literally instantaneously recognise anything, whether a hazard or not. Would you be better able to grasp the concept if I used terms like 'delay' or 'latency'? i'm not the one who isn't grasping the concept. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
color of spring
On 5/22/2016 10:51 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2016-05-23 02:21:12 +0000, nospam said: In article , Eric Stevens wrote: note that the chart only goes up to 500ms, as anything beyond that would be negligible. That's for someone expecting something to happen and mentally prepared to react as soon as it does. anyone who is driving should *always* be expecting something to happen and mentally prepared to react as soon as it does. So you drive around expecting your foot brake to fail. At the same time you are prepared for red light runners. How do you cope with that while watching for approaching traffic crossing over into your lane? i'm prepared for anything that might happen. A Trump presidency? https://www.google.com/search?q=trump+white+house+picture&biw=1280&bih=66 2&tbm=isch&imgil=ytYivwHIRcitaM%253A%253Br5lG_31dF jCDCM%253Bhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fdragoni.tumblr. com%25252Fpost%25252F138196515107%25252Fwelcome-to-trumps-house-making-america-trump&source=iu&pf=m&fir=ytYivwHIRcitaM%253A%252Cr 5lG_31dFjCDCM%252C_&usg=__8s0ADOWUiS41OjH6SUimtl67 DeY%3D&ved=0ahUKEwiDrJiZvfDMAhVCOj4KHbSLDd8QyjcINQ &ei=Hx1DV8OgL8L0-AG0l7b4DQ#imgrc=ytYivwHIRcitaM%3A http://tinyurl.com/hj3l7yv -- PeterN |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
color of spring
In article , PeterN
wrote: A Trump presidency? https://www.google.com/search?q=trum...0&bih=66 2&tb m=isch&imgil=ytYivwHIRcitaM%253A%253Br5lG_31dFjCDC M%253Bhttp%25253A%25252F%252 52Fdragoni.tumblr.com%25252Fpost%25252F13819651510 7%25252Fwelcome-to-trumps-ho use-making-america-trump&source=iu&pf=m&fir=ytYivwHIRcitaM%253A%252Cr 5lG_31dFj CDCM%252C_&usg=__8s0ADOWUiS41OjH6SUimtl67DeY%3D&ve d=0ahUKEwiDrJiZvfDMAhVCOj4KH bSLDd8QyjcINQ&ei=Hx1DV8OgL8L0-AG0l7b4DQ#imgrc=ytYivwHIRcitaM%3A learn how to use google. the image you linked is this, with a *much* shorter url: http://67.media.tumblr.com/ed583a6a4...a3/tumblr_inli ne_o1nbr35kE21qz4eqq_1280.jpg which is from this page: http://dragoni.tumblr.com/post/13819...umps-house-mak ing-america-trump |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
color of spring | nospam | Digital Photography | 10 | May 23rd 16 04:16 PM |
color of spring | PeterN[_6_] | Digital Photography | 12 | May 21st 16 03:16 PM |
color of spring | nospam | Digital Photography | 1 | May 21st 16 03:26 AM |
color of spring | Bill W | Digital Photography | 2 | May 21st 16 02:47 AM |
color of spring | nospam | Digital Photography | 0 | May 20th 16 10:54 PM |