If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Alan Browne wrote:
Gordon Moat wrote: Just checked, and only one message, so I sent a reply. The e-mail address I use for news groups is heavily filtered, and I do not check it that often. It is better to contact me through my website, in case you want a professional answer, or something to do with a business inquiry. Your attglobal address rejects my e-mail every time. Says it has a virus attached (it doesn't / can't). I CC'd the same message to your other e-mail address as well. See below (rejected message). Cheers, Alan A message (from ) was received at 27 Jan 2005 22:06:41 +0000. The following addresses had delivery problems: Permanent Failu Your message may contain a virus. Please contact Microsoft Security. Delivery last attempted at Thu, 27 Jan 2005 22:11:23 -0000 Reporting-MTA: dns; prserv.net Arrival-Date: 27 Jan 2005 22:06:41 +0000 Final-Recipient: rfc822; Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 Your message may contain a virus. Please contact Microsoft Security. Diagnostic-Code: smtp; Permanent Failu Other undefined Status Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 22:11:23 -0000 Looks like that is one of the filters I created. However, if the message is below 30k, it should have gone through. Most of these just hit on a key word, then the filter activates. Ciao! Gordon Moat A G Studio http://www.allgstudio.com |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Lewis Lang wrote:
. . . . . . . . . . Having had (way too much) experience at this I'll add in a few tips... Much appreciated, and you are someone who should know this subject well.. . . . . .. . . P.S. - Unless you are in love with larger sizes, think about "smaller sizes" (like "only" 16x20" or less) as they are far less hassle to get sparkling prints out of 35mm images the smaller you go. Definitely agree with this. My normal print from 35 mm is 10" by 15". Even at that size, it helps to have the best of everything to get the best results. P.P.S. - AOL is discontinuing its newsgroup srvice for land lines soon so I may not be able to post for a long? while until I can download a newsreader that will work with my ancient operating system/computer so don't be surprised if I someday soon am not able to reply for a long while... The older Netscape 4.8 includes a news reader, and runs well with little RAM. It might be quite a bit to download over a phone line, though you might be able to set it to do so over night. They also offer a CD, but you need to pay for that. I am using Netscape 4.8 for my news group postings. I wish you success, some very fine, very large print(s)... and a large bank account ;-), you'll probably need it ;-) :-). Yeah . . . no kidding about the money. My fine art endeavours barely pay for themselves. Ciao! Gordon Moat A G Studio http://www.allgstudio.com |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Gordon Moat wrote:
Looks like that is one of the filters I created. However, if the message is below 30k, it should have gone through. Most of these just hit on a key word, then the filter activates. The msg was just text, and quite short. Something about the filter seems to believe there was a virus... Cheers, Alan -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Alan Browne wrote:
Gordon Moat wrote: Looks like that is one of the filters I created. However, if the message is below 30k, it should have gone through. Most of these just hit on a key word, then the filter activates. The msg was just text, and quite short. Something about the filter seems to believe there was a virus... Cheers, Alan Let me know what the subject line stated, exact words. I might need to adjust that filter, or eliminate it. Your e-mail might not be the only one not getting through. Thanks! Gordon Moat A G Studio http://www.allgstudio.com |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Gordon Moat wrote:
Let me know what the subject line stated, exact words. I might need to adjust that filter, or eliminate it. Your e-mail might not be the only one not getting through. The subject line was: "Finally did it!" Could be the excl. mark? Cheers, Alan -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Alan Browne wrote:
Gordon Moat wrote: Let me know what the subject line stated, exact words. I might need to adjust that filter, or eliminate it. Your e-mail might not be the only one not getting through. The subject line was: "Finally did it!" Could be the excl. mark? Cheers, Alan Message size filtering set to "bytes" instead of "kilobytes". Oops! Should be correct now, though nothing over 20 kb will get through. The virus files do not affect Mac OS, but they are a pain to download on dial up, so that is why they are blocked. Unfortunately, it might affect regular message traffic in some situations. Sorry for the inconvenience. Ciao! Gordon Moat |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Subject: enlarge 35mm to 30x40
From: Gordon Moat Date: Fri, Jan 28, 2005 1:33 PM Message-id: Lewis Lang wrote: . . . . . . . . . . Having had (way too much) experience at this I'll add in a few tips... Much appreciated, and you are someone who should know this subject well.. . . . . . . . Thanks :-). P.S. - Unless you are in love with larger sizes, think about "smaller sizes" (like "only" 16x20" or less) as they are far less hassle to get sparkling prints out of 35mm images the smaller you go. Definitely agree with this. My normal print from 35 mm is 10" by 15". Even at that size, it helps to have the best of everything to get the best results. P.P.S. - AOL is discontinuing its newsgroup srvice for land lines soon so I may not be able to post for a long? while until I can download a newsreader that will work with my ancient operating system/computer so don't be surprised if I someday soon am not able to reply for a long while... The older Netscape 4.8 includes a news reader, and runs well with little RAM. It might be quite a bit to download over a phone line, though you might be able to set it to do so over night. They also offer a CD, but you need to pay for that. I am using Netscape 4.8 for my news group postings. Thanks for the suggestion, Gordon, I'll have to work out the details... Check out my photos at "LEWISVISION": http://members.aol.com/Lewisvisn/home.htm Remove "nospam" to reply ***DUE TO SPAM, I NOW BLOCK ALL E-MAIL NOT ON MY LIST, TO BE ADDED TO MY LIST, PING ME ON THE NEWSGROUP. SORRY FOR THE INCONVENIENCE. :-) *** |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
"Gordon Moat" wrote in message ... Let me know what the subject line stated, exact words. I might need to adjust that filter, or eliminate it. Your e-mail might not be the only one not getting through. You are right about that! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
35mm(?) slide transparency mount question. | Pheasant Plucker® | 35mm Photo Equipment | 16 | January 19th 05 10:26 PM |
35mm(?) slide transparency mount question. | Pheasant Plucker® | 35mm Photo Equipment | 0 | January 15th 05 08:29 PM |
35mm(?) slide transparency mount question. | Pheasant Plucker® | 35mm Photo Equipment | 0 | January 15th 05 08:29 PM |
I need to transfer my digital files to 35mm slides and negatives output and other film format outputs? | Chris | Digital Photography | 5 | September 25th 04 07:43 AM |
advantage of high $ 35mm optics vs. MF now lost? | Bob Monaghan | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 30 | September 12th 04 04:46 AM |