If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon's new 70-200 f/4.0 some images great, some not
On Wed, 5 Dec 2012 22:37:43 -0800 (PST), RichA wrote:
: There's a couple images at f/4.5 on the Dpreview samples. One is : great : : http://masters.galleries.dpreview.co...jLc 6PSEpY%3d : : Another is awful. : : http://masters.galleries.dpreview.co...A2nOw 1dL8%3d : : From what I can see, it looks like residual spherical aberration. But : the stopped down images are sharp as can be. So overall, the lens for : $1400 looks like a winner. Can't read 'em, Rich. Not through Google Groups at work nor with Agent v6 at home. You're easily maintaining your record of posting more unreadable links than everyone else in the photography newsgroups put together. Bob |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon's new 70-200 f/4.0 some images great, some not
On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 22:14:38 -0800 (PST), RichA
wrote: On Dec 6, 9:06*pm, Robert Coe wrote: On Wed, 5 Dec 2012 22:37:43 -0800 (PST), RichA wrote: : There's a couple images at f/4.5 on the Dpreview samples. *One is : great : :http://masters.galleries.dpreview.co...2342060.jpg?AW... : : * Another is awful. : :http://masters.galleries.dpreview.co...2342061.jpg?AW... : : From what I can see, it looks like residual spherical aberration. *But : the stopped down images are sharp as can be. *So overall, the lens for : $1400 looks like a winner. Can't read 'em, Rich. Not through Google Groups at work nor with Agent v6 at home. You're easily maintaining your record of posting more unreadable links than everyone else in the photography newsgroups put together. Bob Uncertain why they are broken. Error message, Request is denied etc. I tried copying and pasting the message but it all turned to unintelligible gobbledy-gook. -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon's new 70-200 f/4.0 some images great, some not
On 12/6/2012 8:06 PM, Robert Coe wrote: On Wed, 5 Dec 2012 22:37:43 -0800 (PST), RichA
wrote: : There's a couple images at f/4.5 on the Dpreview samples. One is : great : : http://masters.galleries.dpreview.co...jLc 6PSEpY%3d : : Another is awful. : : http://masters.galleries.dpreview.co...A2nOw 1dL8%3d : : From what I can see, it looks like residual spherical aberration. But : the stopped down images are sharp as can be. So overall, the lens for : $1400 looks like a winner. Can't read 'em, Rich. Not through Google Groups at work nor with Agent v6 at home. You're easily maintaining your record of posting more unreadable links than everyone else in the photography newsgroups put together. Bob And I can't see them even after finding thumbnails at dpreview. Doug McDonald |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nikon's new 70-200 f/4.0 some images great, some not | Usenet Account | Digital SLR Cameras | 0 | December 6th 12 12:54 PM |
Got any Great Holiday or Travel Images | k2chris | Digital SLR Cameras | 1 | February 20th 08 02:09 AM |
Got any Great Holiday or Travel Images | k2chris | Digital Photography | 0 | February 19th 08 09:23 AM |
Great Images Require Layers of Refinement | Wayne J. Cosshall | Digital Photography | 1 | April 5th 07 03:06 AM |
Great Images Require Layers of Refinement | Wayne J. Cosshall | Digital ZLR Cameras | 1 | April 5th 07 03:06 AM |