If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
(SI) Suggestion to change mandates around for effect
I was thinking... why don't we have the night shots due Dec 19 instead of Nov 21, that way we can have xmas light displays as well. And make the panorama shots for Nov 21. Just a thought... Bob |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
(SI) Suggestion to change mandates around for effect
* Bowser wrote :
"Robert Coe" wrote in message ... On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 10:50:24 -0400, "Bowser" wrote: : wrote in message ... : : : I was thinking... why don't we have the night shots due Dec 19 : instead of Nov 21, that way we can have xmas light displays as : well. : : And make the panorama shots for Nov 21. : : Just a thought... snip / OK, I'll swap them, and post the changes later on today. Away we go... Now I'm confused. What if I wanted to do a night time panorama of some Christmas lights? -- Troy Piggins |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
(SI) Suggestion to change mandates around for effect
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 08:44:25 +1000, Troy Piggins
wrote: : * Bowser wrote : : "Robert Coe" wrote in message : ... : : On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 10:50:24 -0400, "Bowser" wrote: : : wrote in message : ... : : : : : : I was thinking... why don't we have the night shots due Dec 19 : : instead of Nov 21, that way we can have xmas light displays as : : well. : : : : And make the panorama shots for Nov 21. : : : : Just a thought... : snip / : OK, I'll swap them, and post the changes later on today. : Away we go... : : Now I'm confused. What if I wanted to do a night time panorama : of some Christmas lights? Well, for one thing, you'll have to stay up later to get the shot than we in the Northern Hemisphere would. ;^) Bob |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
(SI) Suggestion to change mandates around for effect
On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 19:43:06 -0400, tony cooper
wrote: I could have done a panorama last week. Some idiot neighbor of mine is Tea Party fruitcake and did a Halloween yard scene with gravestones for Nancy Pelosi, Barak Obama, and several other Democratic pols. It was really offensive as far as I'm concerned. I don't have any objections to anyone having whatever addle-pated political opinions they want, but to make Halloween a political statement exceeds the bounds of propriety. How do you explain to small children why the guy thinks the President of the US should be ridiculed in this manner? I should have hung an effigy of Christine O'Donnell in witch regalia in his tree. We have a local nutcase up here, too, who posted these signs in his front yard during the 2008 presidential campaign: http://www.manzi.org/pix/nobama4.jpg http://www.manzi.org/pix/nobama5.jpg Bill Hudak, the nutjob who posted the signs later ran for congress in the MA 6th district. He took a beating. I know the guy, and we "discussed" these signs and he said that he had every right to post them. So I ginned up a mock sign of my own. I snapped a pic of him waving (it really looked like a "sig heil" salute) to a crowd at one of his rallies, and then PS'd him into a Nazi uniform with the words "vote for facism" on the sign. He went ballistic. I told him that if he had the right to make Obama look like Bin Laden, I had the right to make him look like Hitler. He disagreed. And he didn't get the point, either. I didn't post the sign. I refused to sink to his level. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
(SI) Suggestion to change mandates around for effect
"Savageduck" wrote in message news:2010110319570811272-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom... On 2010-11-03 19:50:08 -0700, tony cooper said: The real blow was the election of Rick Scott as Governor. He was CEO of a company that committed a series of the largest Medicare frauds in history. He claims that he was not aware of the frauds. (Took the 5th 75 times in court appearances) That means either he is a bald-faced liar or an incompetent CEO unaware of what his company was up to. I'd go with "bald-faced liar." "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity" Richard Feynman Nobel Prize Physicist |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
(SI) Suggestion to change mandates around for effect
On 2010-11-04 18:16:13 -0700, "Bill Graham" said:
"Savageduck" wrote in message news:2010110319570811272-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom... On 2010-11-03 19:50:08 -0700, tony cooper said: The real blow was the election of Rick Scott as Governor. He was CEO of a company that committed a series of the largest Medicare frauds in history. He claims that he was not aware of the frauds. (Took the 5th 75 times in court appearances) That means either he is a bald-faced liar or an incompetent CEO unaware of what his company was up to. I'd go with "bald-faced liar." "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity" Richard Feynman Nobel Prize Physicist If you are going to quote anybody, Feynman is a fine choice. The best, being the letter he wrote to his draft board to obtain a 4F deferment; "Dear Sirs, I do not think I should be drafted because I am teaching science students and it is partly in the strength of our future scientists that the national welfare lies. Nevertheless, you may decide that I should be deferred because of the result of my medical report, namely, that I am psychiatrically unfit. I feel that no weight whatsoever should be attached to this report because I consider it to be a gross error. I am calling this error to your attention because I am insane enough not to wish to take advantage of it. Sincerely, R. P. Feynman" Result: "Deferred, 4F, Medical Reasons." -- Regards, Savageduck |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
(SI) Suggestion to change mandates around for effect
Bowser wrote:
He disagreed. And he didn't get the point, Oh man. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
(SI) Suggestion to change mandates around for effect
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 18:16:13 -0700, "Bill Graham" wrote:
: : "Savageduck" wrote in message : news:2010110319570811272-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom... : On 2010-11-03 19:50:08 -0700, tony cooper : said: : The real blow was the election of Rick Scott as Governor. He was CEO : of a company that committed a series of the largest Medicare frauds in : history. He claims that he was not aware of the frauds. (Took the : 5th 75 times in court appearances) That means either he is a : bald-faced liar or an incompetent CEO unaware of what his company was : up to. : : I'd go with "bald-faced liar." : : : "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity" : Richard Feynman : Nobel Prize Physicist There's much truth in Feynman's words. But there are those for whom only malice has explanatory value. Case in point: Stupidity is (arguably) a sufficient explanation for George W. Bush, but not for Richard Cheney. Bob |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
(SI) Suggestion to change mandates around for effect
"Savageduck" wrote in message news:2010110419540878840-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom... On 2010-11-04 18:16:13 -0700, "Bill Graham" said: "Savageduck" wrote in message news:2010110319570811272-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom... On 2010-11-03 19:50:08 -0700, tony cooper said: The real blow was the election of Rick Scott as Governor. He was CEO of a company that committed a series of the largest Medicare frauds in history. He claims that he was not aware of the frauds. (Took the 5th 75 times in court appearances) That means either he is a bald-faced liar or an incompetent CEO unaware of what his company was up to. I'd go with "bald-faced liar." "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity" Richard Feynman Nobel Prize Physicist If you are going to quote anybody, Feynman is a fine choice. The best, being the letter he wrote to his draft board to obtain a 4F deferment; "Dear Sirs, I do not think I should be drafted because I am teaching science students and it is partly in the strength of our future scientists that the national welfare lies. Nevertheless, you may decide that I should be deferred because of the result of my medical report, namely, that I am psychiatrically unfit. I feel that no weight whatsoever should be attached to this report because I consider it to be a gross error. I am calling this error to your attention because I am insane enough not to wish to take advantage of it. Sincerely, R. P. Feynman" Result: "Deferred, 4F, Medical Reasons." -- Regards, Savageduck Ha! I have read all of Feynman's books, and I don't remember that. - Thanks! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
(SI) Suggestion to change mandates around for effect
"Robert Coe" wrote in message ... On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 18:16:13 -0700, "Bill Graham" wrote: : : "Savageduck" wrote in message : news:2010110319570811272-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom... : On 2010-11-03 19:50:08 -0700, tony cooper : said: : The real blow was the election of Rick Scott as Governor. He was CEO : of a company that committed a series of the largest Medicare frauds in : history. He claims that he was not aware of the frauds. (Took the : 5th 75 times in court appearances) That means either he is a : bald-faced liar or an incompetent CEO unaware of what his company was : up to. : : I'd go with "bald-faced liar." : : : "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity" : Richard Feynman : Nobel Prize Physicist There's much truth in Feynman's words. But there are those for whom only malice has explanatory value. Case in point: Stupidity is (arguably) a sufficient explanation for George W. Bush, but not for Richard Cheney. Bob Yes. There are some things that are not, "adequately explained" by stupidity. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[SI] New Mandates | Bowser | Digital SLR Cameras | 0 | September 23rd 10 01:21 AM |
New Mandates! Get 'em while they're hot! | George Kerby | Digital Photography | 0 | August 5th 10 12:44 AM |
New Mandates! Get 'em while they're hot! | bugbear | Digital SLR Cameras | 1 | July 20th 10 02:26 AM |
[SI] New Mandates | Bowser | Digital Photography | 36 | February 12th 10 02:10 AM |
Change in Enlarger Head Height corresponds to Change in Exposure Time, but by how much? | Gregory W Blank | In The Darkroom | 32 | August 17th 04 12:11 AM |