A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » General Photography » In The Darkroom
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Is selenium worth the effort



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 27th 04, 08:24 PM
Jim Phelps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Is selenium worth the effort


"Mike" wrote in message
news
When I desire a nice brown-toned print, I've been using Kodak Brown Toner.

However when I want strictly B&W, I don't tone at all. Is Kodak Rapid
Selenium worth the effort? I hear that it makes prints "glow" by
increasing the Dmax.



Depends upon the paper and your desires.

I've realized a deeper black with Agfa MCP and MCC and like the look alot.
Looked OK on Cache FB Plus and on Ilford MG IV RC was stunning. This is in
addition to the archival qualities it imparts on the print as well. I think
it's worth it for the extended life it gives the print alone.

KRST is not the cheapest chemical on the dealer's shelf, but it won't break
the bank either. Might I suggest you buy a bottle and give it a try. If
you are really skeptical, tone one of your work prints first and see what
the result is. It may convince you right there. I've ended up with work
print looking better than what I thought was a good final after dunking it
in KRST (did this to make sure it was still good).




  #2  
Old February 27th 04, 08:47 PM
Francis A. Miniter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Is selenium worth the effort

Hi Mike,

A year or two ago, I posted in this newsgroup a chart of what effects
Selenium has on what papers given various developers. You may want to
look it up. Some papers do not change color, some have radical changes.

A study of increase in contrast was published in Photo Techniques USA a
couple years ago. It found that for the maximum increase in contrast, 2
- 4 minutes in selenium is desireable, and that after that there is a
slight drop off from the gains achieved. For some papers, a tonal
shift will already have started by 4 minutes, however. You have to know
which is which.

Another consideration is archivability. It is generally accepted that
2-4 minutes in a 1:9 solution of KRST does not give full protection to a
paper. For that 10-11 minutes is probably needed. Even at that, it
seems that some protection that used to be achievable with KRST is now
longer available because "contaminants" are no longer in the KRST. The
"contaminants" turned out to be the principal ingredient in Kodak Brown
Toner. This leads to the interesting possibility of intentionally
contaminating your KRST with minute amount of Brown Toner - just enough
that some protective effect is had, but not enough to affect tonality in
a 2-4 minute bath.


Francis A. Miniter


Mike wrote:

When I desire a nice brown-toned print, I've been using Kodak Brown Toner.

However when I want strictly B&W, I don't tone at all. Is Kodak Rapid
Selenium worth the effort? I hear that it makes prints "glow" by
increasing the Dmax.





  #3  
Old February 27th 04, 09:11 PM
Nicholas O. Lindan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Is selenium worth the effort

"Francis A. Miniter"

This leads to the interesting possibility of intentionally
contaminating your KRST with minute amount of Brown Toner


This used to be sold as Kodak Polytoner, no longer available,
now you have to mix your own.

Linda Butler is a current proponent of Polytoner:

http://www.lindabutlerphoto.com/

She does it to split-tone with pink highlights and brown
shadows.

--
Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio
Consulting Engineer: Electronics; Informatics; Photonics.
  #4  
Old February 28th 04, 09:52 AM
Dan Quinn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Is selenium worth the effort

"Francis A. Miniter" wrote

This leads to the interesting possibility of intentionally
contaminating your KRST with minute amount of Brown Toner - just
enough that some protective effect is had, but not enough to affect
tonality in a 2-4 minute bath.

Francis A. Miniter


You may have read the same article I read. Sodium sulfide at a
1:9,999 dilution imparted excellent protection to microfilm.
Of course print paper is not the same thing. Even though,
it may work. Perhaps the IPI could be coaxed into testing
print paper. Dan
  #5  
Old March 1st 04, 03:27 AM
Msherck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Is selenium worth the effort

Is Kodak Rapid
Selenium worth the effort? I hear that it makes prints "glow" by
increasing the Dmax.


Its effect depends on the dilution, paper, and the amount of time you leave
the print in the solution. Higher dilutions (1:20 or greater) have little or
no effect on D-max and are used to make the silvered image more permanent.
Lower dilutions (1:5 or less, usually,) can have an effect on D-max and/or
image color, but it depends on the paper. Since you use it in light, keep an
eye on the print and pull it when you get the effect you like. Keeping an
identical reference print (wet) to compare it to can be of some help in judging
the changes that have occurred.

Obviously, all the above are generalities: your mileage may vary. Experiment
and have fun!

mjs

C program run. C program crash. C programmer quit.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.