If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
[SI] Too long, or not long enough?
Good gravy, I've returned to making commentary! And thus the header - it's certainly the former for me, since I should do this a lot more often, but I expect to hear votes for the latter... Anyway, these be just me opinions, hokay? Certainly not worth taking seriously, and c'mon, why start now? For those just emerging from their coccoons or something, the images in question can be viewed at http://www.pbase.com/shootin/end. Anyone should feel free to offer their own comments - that's what they're there for. Tom Hudson - A nice portrait, not quite sellable quality, but pretty good for a candid. Pleasant colors, nice and undistracting background. The motion blur takes away a little, I think, and overall it doesn't quite have enough in there to carry the mandate - she could just as easily be The Beginning. Any other little touch might have strengthened it: her eyes looking out over the audience, a little sheen of sweat, the music obviously near the end of the pages, or the standing bow just a little later? Just something. Nice shot, just not quite communicating this particular mandate. Sell it to her anyway ;-) Paul Furman - I was bugged by this slightly for a short while, and now I finally put my finger on it: It doesn't seem like the 'End' because you wouldn't need a Stop sign to keep you from proceeding. I'm put in mind of a collage I saw many years back, a forced-perspective kind of thing, but overall I kind of like the chaos of imagery and colors - anyone catch the peace symbol in the eye of the skull? The wide-angle lens definitely provides the most impact for all the elements. Probably a bit more digital work than the rulz intend, but then again, how much latitude would a decent film give to work with? Ah, I'll let Alan decide. Neat image, fits the mandate but not too directly. Paul Bielec - You know, as I was considering this mandate I thought about how "The End" is strictly a human concept, and this image seems to illustrate that. The apples look like they're full of potential, hardly an end, and from the trees' standpoint, all set to start new growth. But there's still an element of the "end of the season harvest", and I can accept that I think. Lovely light for the subject, but just a bit too direct an approach for my tastes, and I keep wanting to see some 'grabber' from the prominent fruit. Methinks a slightly different composition would be stronger. Brian Fane - Ah! Nice approach to the subject, and a technically fine way of tackling it. The sign slams the concept home to me, and the wheat field seems overwhelmed by comparison. Two very subtle things assist this too: The listing of "tracts" on the sign, indication of a development to come, and the framing that prevents even the treeline from cresting over the sign, making it undeniably dominant in the frame. Nice balance of tones, too, even from the sky. Faint distraction from the other sign, but not too significant. Great job! Bowser, uh, Boswer [hey, he spelled it that way, not me] - I think the downward slope is the part that detracts slightly from the mandate, for me anyway, and this is helped by the dude being 'over the crest' as it were - there's an implication that the trail may continue downwards. Otherwise it works pretty well, and strengthened by the pose, almost wistful. The elements all frame together nicely, and the foreground grass hints that we're sneaking a peek. Unfortunately the boy is a little over-exposed, and as the main subject this is noticeable. Overall fairly good, but needs a little oomph. Ken Nadvornick - Ken knows how to use B&W, without a doubt. This one is stark and direct, contrasty (from the lighting) and still possessing great tones throughout. The subject is nailed home with no subtlety, however, a little heavy-handed for my tastes. Interesting effect from the age of the corpse - to me, it's moved away from the sadness of a recent death and begun to enter the realm of the soon-to-disappear, less desolate. But c'mon, Ken, a 21.4% crop? That's so bourgeois! JIm Kramer - Jim, where are your hyperfocal macro focusing skills? Geeezzzz... Nicely framed, with impressionistic splashes of color to prevent it from being monochrome. Not perhaps the strongest approach to the mandate, but the position of the anole's legs do seem to hint that he'd like there to be more room for climbing. Nice contrast of the detailed textures for subject against the smoke of the background, harmed slightly by the crosshatching at upper left. Seems like the head's slightly soft. Perhaps I'm too used to this kind of subject, but to me, he's looking directly at the viewer, communicating rather than being observed. Al Denelsbeck - After two weeks of not finding any appropriate subjects for the mandate, I went out the day it was due with this (among other approaches) in mind, and lucked out by finding a suspiciously dead juniper sitting near some ancient headstones in the cemetary. Played around with framing and settled on this one - it could just be me, but the branches have that 'clutching hands' aspect, and I like the subtlety of the headstones. My second choice was staged later that evening and can be seen at http://wading-in.net/Add/Shootin2.html The Dave - Fits the mandate well, great light for the subject, lovely bokeh with good background elements. But just way too direct for me. Flower shots tend to be overdone, and I might have liked this one better if it had that typical approach with the bud just about filling the frame, making an ironic statement of some sort. Or maybe cutting it to put in a completely dry vase... Doug Payne - A very nice landscape taken at a great time of year - good foliage color, nice pastel sky, just a bit too much contrast from the rock face. It makes it stand out from the background, though, and gives an entirely different approach to the mandate. But the discovery of the climber takes away from that a bit, because the rock's implied direction is left across the frame, cut off abruptly, but the climber's is primary up (it can be argued down to the right, too). So perhaps slightly weak on the mandate, though the strength of the shot overall counteracts this. Plus Doug is making me think again about hitting the waterfall areas out at the western part of the state when the colors hit. Joseph Kewfi - Now who would have thought we'd have two dead cats? This one doesn't quite bring it together, though, a bit haphazard in the elements and framing, and the color and blur just seem like a mistake, where in other uses or compositions it could have a strong artistic affect. There's a forlorn and abandoned aspect of it, and the much-better condition of the cat (as compared to Ken's) indicates the tragedy of a lost pet, but just not bringing it together. And that would be all of them this time. Thanks for playing, and while you've been reading this, I've been raiding your fridge. Paul, your veggie drawer needs cleaning out... - Al. -- To reply, insert dash in address to match domain below Online photo gallery at www.wading-in.net |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
[SI] Too long, or not long enough?
Al Denelsbeck wrote:
Good gravy, I've returned to making commentary! And thus the header - it's certainly the former for me, since I should do this a lot more often, but I expect to hear votes for the latter... Anyway, these be just me opinions, hokay? Certainly not worth taking seriously, and c'mon, why start now? For those just emerging from their coccoons or something, the images in question can be viewed at http://www.pbase.com/shootin/end. Anyone should feel free to offer their own comments - that's what they're there for. Tom Hudson - A nice portrait, not quite sellable quality, but pretty good for a candid. Pleasant colors, nice and undistracting background. The motion blur takes away a little, I think, and overall it doesn't quite have enough in there to carry the mandate - she could just as easily be The Beginning. Any other little touch might have strengthened it: her eyes looking out over the audience, a little sheen of sweat, the music obviously near the end of the pages, or the standing bow just a little later? Just something. Nice shot, just not quite communicating this particular mandate. Sell it to her anyway ;-) Paul Furman - I was bugged by this slightly for a short while, and now I finally put my finger on it: It doesn't seem like the 'End' because you wouldn't need a Stop sign to keep you from proceeding. I'm put in mind of a collage I saw many years back, a forced-perspective kind of thing, but overall I kind of like the chaos of imagery and colors - anyone catch the peace symbol in the eye of the skull? The wide-angle lens definitely provides the most impact for all the elements. Probably a bit more digital work than the rulz intend, but then again, how much latitude would a decent film give to work with? Ah, I'll let Alan decide. Neat image, fits the mandate but not too directly. Paul Bielec - You know, as I was considering this mandate I thought about how "The End" is strictly a human concept, and this image seems to illustrate that. The apples look like they're full of potential, hardly an end, and from the trees' standpoint, all set to start new growth. But there's still an element of the "end of the season harvest", and I can accept that I think. Lovely light for the subject, but just a bit too direct an approach for my tastes, and I keep wanting to see some 'grabber' from the prominent fruit. Methinks a slightly different composition would be stronger. That one struck me as noting that here we have beautiful, tasty apples...that are going to waste on the ground as they've fallen from the tree...soon to be rotten rather than enjoyed. The End. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
[SI] Too long, or not long enough?
Paul Bielec - You know, as I was considering this mandate I thought about how "The End" is strictly a human concept, and this image seems to illustrate that. The apples look like they're full of potential, hardly an end, and from the trees' standpoint, all set to start new growth. But there's still an element of the "end of the season harvest", and I can accept that I think. Lovely light for the subject, but just a bit too direct an approach for my tastes, and I keep wanting to see some 'grabber' from the prominent fruit. Methinks a slightly different composition would be stronger. Thanks for your comments. I agree about the composition as seeing it at home I had the very same thought that something even better couls have been done about it. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
[SI] Too long, or not long enough?
On 13/10/2005 9:58 PM, Al Denelsbeck wrote:
Doug Payne - A very nice landscape taken at a great time of year - good foliage color, nice pastel sky, just a bit too much contrast from the rock face. It makes it stand out from the background, though, and gives an entirely different approach to the mandate. But the discovery of the climber takes away from that a bit, because the rock's implied direction is left across the frame, cut off abruptly, but the climber's is primary up (it can be argued down to the right, too). So perhaps slightly weak on the mandate, though the strength of the shot overall counteracts this. Plus Doug is making me think again about hitting the waterfall areas out at the western part of the state when the colors hit. Yeah, unfortunately with a lens that wide you can't easily see the climber's route which is up and to the left, even though she's looking down and to her right (damn climbers are *so* uncooperative :-). There's a couple of bolts there with quickdraws attached that are hard to see. Follow the horizontal crack above her left hand off to the left. Top roping is now outlawed here because of damage to the trees, but the original route "ended" at the top left. Thanks for the comments. Colours are quickly fading here. Another "end". They weren't great this year anyway, quite muted what with all the air pollution over the summer. That shot was taken in the Beaver Valley at "Old Baldy". It's part of the Niagara Escarpment, although considerably north of Niagara Falls. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
[SI] Too long, or not long enough?
Thanks for the meaningful commentary. This sort of open mandate was nice
though I agree many did not hit the mandate, at least it wasn't so restrictive so you could submit just about anything. Al Denelsbeck wrote: Paul, your veggie drawer needs cleaning out... ewe, that's what the smell is |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
[SI] Too long, or not long enough?
"Al Denelsbeck" wrote:
Ken Nadvornick - Ken knows how to use B&W, without a doubt. This one is stark and direct, contrasty (from the lighting) and still possessing great tones throughout. The subject is nailed home with no subtlety, however, a little heavy-handed for my tastes. Interesting effect from the age of the corpse - to me, it's moved away from the sadness of a recent death and begun to enter the realm of the soon-to-disappear, less desolate. But c'mon, Ken, a 21.4% crop? That's so bourgeois! Thanks for that, Al. Most of my photos benefit from far more preplanning than this one did. I usually spend most of the first week turning over concepts in my mind until I settle on what, if anything, I want to attempt. Then I go out and try to put on film what I see in my head. Sometimes it works, other times it does not. This one was just there as I walked past while looking for an Ugly America image. I was initially attracted by the brilliant white teeth against the dark of the cat's open mouth. Looked like a final agonized frozen scream to me. Unfortunately, at only 594x727 pixels I'm afraid this aspect of the composition doesn't present too well. The tracks were included both to suggest the cause of the poor animal's demise, as well as to lend a graphic element to the photograph. Their angle and slight convergence add a bit of energy to what I think would otherwise likely be a "dead" composition. (Sorry...) The noted lack of "subtlety" for a subject such as this was vital. Also, you are correct regarding your "soon-to-disappear" observation. Two days later I drove by and Fluffy was indeed gone... Ken P.S. The "21.4% crop" statistic is a by-product of those damned digital processes and mentality, wherein everything must be quantified down to the last atom, simply because it can be. I much prefer using some old cardboard for cropping, or simply waving my hands through the projected enlarger light until I feel things are just right. Doing so gives far more relevancy to the phrase "painting with light." Just because one can lay out a football field with a laser beam does not mean it's necessary -- or even desirable -- to do so. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
[SI] Too long, or not long enough?
"Al Denelsbeck" wrote in message .9... joseph kewfi can ae1 Doug Payne nikon d100 The Dave Can Eos 10D Canon Pro-90IS jim Kramer Can Eos 10D Ken Nadvornick Nikon F2 Bowser Canon Eos 20D Brian Fane Can Eos 20D Paul Bielec Can Eos 300D Paul Furman Nikon D70 Tom Hudson Can Eos 20D Not only digital slr rules but it seems mostly canon. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[SI] [ Photo Shoot In ] FINAL CALL FOR Round IV Mandators | Alan Browne | Digital SLR Cameras | 0 | June 24th 05 07:49 PM |
Supports for camera and long lens | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 2 | May 5th 05 06:52 PM |
Long lens for Nikon D100? | Basic Wedge | Digital Photography | 2 | March 20th 05 03:06 AM |
[OT] - [SI] New Mandate | Alan Browne | Digital SLR Cameras | 1 | March 13th 05 09:40 PM |
How long does unused fixer stay usable? | Richard Knoppow | In The Darkroom | 2 | March 30th 04 11:13 AM |