A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Photo Equipment » 35mm Photo Equipment
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Canon EOS 1Ds MkII Preview



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #25  
Old September 21st 04, 07:21 PM
Simon Stanmore
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"TP" wrote in message
...

No,it doesn't come anywhere near blowing away a 6000 dpi drum scan of
a Fuji Provia 100F slide or NPS negative. Nowhere remotely near.




Were these drum scans performed out by goblins or fairies?
--
Simon
http://www.pbase.com/phoenikz


  #26  
Old September 21st 04, 07:30 PM
Simon Stanmore
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Brian C. Baird" wrote in message
.. .
In article ,
says...
The images at the Canon site are very detailed and clean.


I'm drooling as we speak. I've open one in Photoshop to tweak it... but
I'm afraid to. It looks too good.
--
http://www.pbase.com/bcbaird/



Run a luminosity layered 400/0.3/0 USM over the portrait. This cam' could
become a studio favourite
--
Simon
http://www.pbase.com/phoenikz


  #27  
Old September 21st 04, 07:30 PM
Simon Stanmore
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Brian C. Baird" wrote in message
.. .
In article ,
says...
The images at the Canon site are very detailed and clean.


I'm drooling as we speak. I've open one in Photoshop to tweak it... but
I'm afraid to. It looks too good.
--
http://www.pbase.com/bcbaird/



Run a luminosity layered 400/0.3/0 USM over the portrait. This cam' could
become a studio favourite
--
Simon
http://www.pbase.com/phoenikz


  #28  
Old September 21st 04, 08:41 PM
Dallas
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 15:42:21 +0000, RSD99 wrote:

From the EOS Mail-list 09/20/2004

EOS 1Ds mark ll

Full frame (36x24mm) DSLR
16MP, 4992x3328 pixels
(16.6 mega pixels)
Filesize in RAW is 14.6MB


Jaysus! If the price doesn't kill you, getting enough memory will! By my
calculations you would only get 69 shots on a 1GB card.

I like the fact that it is full frame, but for all intents and purposes,
do we really need more than 12 mega-pixels??? I get stressed working with
35Mb NEF to TIFF files on my computer. I'd hate to know what the RAW
conversion to TIFF on this thing will come in at. About 100Mb's per file?
6 or 7 images on one CD?

My lab has started charging extra for having to convert TIFF files to JPEG
so that they can print them on the Frontier.

16MP sounds like a lot of work!

--
Dallas www.dallasdahms.com
"Going down a dirty inner city side road I plotted
Madness passed me by, she smiled hi, I nodded"
- Sixto Rodriguez

  #29  
Old September 21st 04, 08:41 PM
Dallas
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 15:42:21 +0000, RSD99 wrote:

From the EOS Mail-list 09/20/2004

EOS 1Ds mark ll

Full frame (36x24mm) DSLR
16MP, 4992x3328 pixels
(16.6 mega pixels)
Filesize in RAW is 14.6MB


Jaysus! If the price doesn't kill you, getting enough memory will! By my
calculations you would only get 69 shots on a 1GB card.

I like the fact that it is full frame, but for all intents and purposes,
do we really need more than 12 mega-pixels??? I get stressed working with
35Mb NEF to TIFF files on my computer. I'd hate to know what the RAW
conversion to TIFF on this thing will come in at. About 100Mb's per file?
6 or 7 images on one CD?

My lab has started charging extra for having to convert TIFF files to JPEG
so that they can print them on the Frontier.

16MP sounds like a lot of work!

--
Dallas www.dallasdahms.com
"Going down a dirty inner city side road I plotted
Madness passed me by, she smiled hi, I nodded"
- Sixto Rodriguez

  #30  
Old September 21st 04, 08:56 PM
Alan Browne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dallas wrote:


Jaysus! If the price doesn't kill you, getting enough memory will! By my
calculations you would only get 69 shots on a 1GB card.


Of course if Nikon had gotten here first it would have been a triumph over the
forces of darkness.


--
-- rec.photo.equipment.35mm user resource:
-- http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.--
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CANON - The Great Innovator (was: CANON – The Great Pretender) Steven M. Scharf Digital Photography 104 September 3rd 04 01:01 PM
CANON - The Great Innovator (was: CANON – The Great Pretender) Steven M. Scharf 35mm Photo Equipment 92 September 3rd 04 01:01 PM
Canon 10d or Nikon D70. Dmanfish Digital Photography 102 August 18th 04 12:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.