|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
September 18th 04, 10:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Nice shot.
How big is the RAW file? Thanks. "Simon Stanmore" wrote in message ... "Annika1980" wrote in message ... Here's a full-sized 8.2MP image that jumped into the 20D this afternoon. http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/33932957/original Sharpening was turned OFF during conversion from the RAW file. Looks pretty good for an unsharpened file Bret. Check out this 20D file from controlled lighting ... http://www.pbase.com/r_p/image/33834060/original . 'Large' sensor 8MP capture is where digital matches 100 ISO 35mm in terms of resolution. Makes you wonder what $1500 will buy us in 5 years from now doesn't it -- Simon http://www.pbase.com/phoenikz 
|
|
#22
September 18th 04, 11:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Annika1980 wrote:
Why didn't it appear in the EXIF? Apparently the Canon software I used strips this data. Sheesh! Hopefully they'll fix these nits... Cheers, Alan PS: feet dry? -- -- rec.photo.equipment.35mm user resource: -- http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.--
|
|
#23
September 18th 04, 11:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Annika1980 wrote:
Why didn't it appear in the EXIF? Apparently the Canon software I used strips this data. Sheesh! Hopefully they'll fix these nits... Cheers, Alan PS: feet dry? -- -- rec.photo.equipment.35mm user resource: -- http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.--
|
|
#24
September 18th 04, 11:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Annika1980 wrote:
Why didn't it appear in the EXIF? Apparently the Canon software I used strips this data. Sheesh! Hopefully they'll fix these nits... Cheers, Alan PS: feet dry? -- -- rec.photo.equipment.35mm user resource: -- http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.--
|
|
#25
September 18th 04, 11:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Simon Stanmore wrote:
Looks pretty good for an unsharpened file Bret. Check out this 20D file from controlled lighting ... http://www.pbase.com/r_p/image/33834060/original . 'Large' sensor 8MP capture is where digital matches 100 ISO 35mm in terms of resolution. Makes you wonder what $1500 will buy us in 5 years from now doesn't it ....amazing fine detail ... could have exposed it a bit lower... (Nice to have you back Simon...) -- -- rec.photo.equipment.35mm user resource: -- http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.--
|
|
#26
September 18th 04, 11:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Simon Stanmore wrote:
Looks pretty good for an unsharpened file Bret. Check out this 20D file from controlled lighting ... http://www.pbase.com/r_p/image/33834060/original . 'Large' sensor 8MP capture is where digital matches 100 ISO 35mm in terms of resolution. Makes you wonder what $1500 will buy us in 5 years from now doesn't it ....amazing fine detail ... could have exposed it a bit lower... (Nice to have you back Simon...) -- -- rec.photo.equipment.35mm user resource: -- http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.--
|
|
#27
September 19th 04, 09:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
No idea Donald - it's not my shot
-- Simon http://www.pbase.com/phoenikz "Donald Specker" wrote in message news:vY13d.699$Ec4.459@trndny04... Nice shot. How big is the RAW file? Thanks. "Simon Stanmore" wrote in message ... "Annika1980" wrote in message ... Here's a full-sized 8.2MP image that jumped into the 20D this afternoon. http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/33932957/original Sharpening was turned OFF during conversion from the RAW file. Looks pretty good for an unsharpened file Bret. Check out this 20D file from controlled lighting ... http://www.pbase.com/r_p/image/33834060/original . 'Large' sensor 8MP capture is where digital matches 100 ISO 35mm in terms of resolution. Makes you wonder what $1500 will buy us in 5 years from now doesn't it -- Simon http://www.pbase.com/phoenikz
|
|
#28
September 19th 04, 09:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
No idea Donald - it's not my shot
-- Simon http://www.pbase.com/phoenikz "Donald Specker" wrote in message news:vY13d.699$Ec4.459@trndny04... Nice shot. How big is the RAW file? Thanks. "Simon Stanmore" wrote in message ... "Annika1980" wrote in message ... Here's a full-sized 8.2MP image that jumped into the 20D this afternoon. http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/33932957/original Sharpening was turned OFF during conversion from the RAW file. Looks pretty good for an unsharpened file Bret. Check out this 20D file from controlled lighting ... http://www.pbase.com/r_p/image/33834060/original . 'Large' sensor 8MP capture is where digital matches 100 ISO 35mm in terms of resolution. Makes you wonder what $1500 will buy us in 5 years from now doesn't it -- Simon http://www.pbase.com/phoenikz
|
|
#29
September 19th 04, 09:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Strange, the exposure looks spot on to me.
I've never really been away Alan. I've just not been in the mood for getting involved with all the nonsense that's been going on. I suspect that many other regulars from days gone by are still ligging around but not posting -- Simon http://www.pbase.com/phoenikz "Alan Browne" wrote in message . .. Simon Stanmore wrote: Looks pretty good for an unsharpened file Bret. Check out this 20D file from controlled lighting ... http://www.pbase.com/r_p/image/33834060/original . 'Large' sensor 8MP capture is where digital matches 100 ISO 35mm in terms of resolution. Makes you wonder what $1500 will buy us in 5 years from now doesn't it ...amazing fine detail ... could have exposed it a bit lower... (Nice to have you back Simon...) -- -- rec.photo.equipment.35mm user resource: -- http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.--
|
|
#30
September 19th 04, 10:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Simon Stanmore wrote:
Strange, the exposure looks spot on to me. The sheen in the skin from the light is high. The eyes tell the story on that one. (flat on lighting). The skin tone, where not directly flat lit does look right, so I retract that. I've never really been away Alan. I've just not been in the mood for getting involved with all the nonsense that's been going on. I suspect that many other regulars from days gone by are still ligging around but not posting I suspected as much. -- -- rec.photo.equipment.35mm user resource: -- http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.--
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| D60: LARGER THAN LIFE !! | Annika1980 | 35mm Photo Equipment | 4 | July 16th 04 02:19 PM |
| Master Mason Handbook | Doug Robbins | 35mm Photo Equipment | 0 | July 15th 04 03:33 PM |
| D60: LARGER THAN LIFE !!! | Annika1980 | Digital Photography | 15 | July 15th 04 02:01 AM |
| Book Review: "Marilyn: Her Life In Her Own Words", George Barris | Paul | 35mm Photo Equipment | 0 | June 15th 04 01:26 AM |
| Book Review: "Marilyn: Her Life In Her Own Words", George Barris | Paul | Photographing People | 0 | June 15th 04 01:26 AM |
Linear Mode
