If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
"William Graham" wrote in message news:ZLBdd.505767$8_6.364591@attbi_s04... I meant for the US. We've never suffered an attack like that in our recent history. Bush was asleep at the switch, and we paid for it. What nonsense! What could Bush have done about 9/11, when the CIA was gutted back in the 70's and it became politically incorrect to maintain any secret organization whatsoever? I remember a presidential directive, (under Richard Nixon, I believe) that said from now on, the CIA would have to publish a list of every cent they spent. This effectively made it impossible for them to maintain any operatives, or perform any clandestine operations from that point on. It effectively disbanded that organization....Of what use is a CIA if they can't carry on anything in secret? How can they possible know where the Al Queda is doing if they can't infiltrate them with their operatives? You can't blame Bush, or even Clinton, for that......You can, however, blame the liberals. (and I do, brother, I do.) Blame whoever you want, but the absolute fact is that we were attacked, successfully, on Dumbya's watch. That makes it his fault. Deal with it. He's a total failure. |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
"William Graham" wrote in message news:ZLBdd.505767$8_6.364591@attbi_s04... I meant for the US. We've never suffered an attack like that in our recent history. Bush was asleep at the switch, and we paid for it. What nonsense! What could Bush have done about 9/11, when the CIA was gutted back in the 70's and it became politically incorrect to maintain any secret organization whatsoever? I remember a presidential directive, (under Richard Nixon, I believe) that said from now on, the CIA would have to publish a list of every cent they spent. This effectively made it impossible for them to maintain any operatives, or perform any clandestine operations from that point on. It effectively disbanded that organization....Of what use is a CIA if they can't carry on anything in secret? How can they possible know where the Al Queda is doing if they can't infiltrate them with their operatives? You can't blame Bush, or even Clinton, for that......You can, however, blame the liberals. (and I do, brother, I do.) Blame whoever you want, but the absolute fact is that we were attacked, successfully, on Dumbya's watch. That makes it his fault. Deal with it. He's a total failure. |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
"William Graham" wrote in message news:ZLBdd.505767$8_6.364591@attbi_s04... I meant for the US. We've never suffered an attack like that in our recent history. Bush was asleep at the switch, and we paid for it. What nonsense! What could Bush have done about 9/11, when the CIA was gutted back in the 70's and it became politically incorrect to maintain any secret organization whatsoever? I remember a presidential directive, (under Richard Nixon, I believe) that said from now on, the CIA would have to publish a list of every cent they spent. This effectively made it impossible for them to maintain any operatives, or perform any clandestine operations from that point on. It effectively disbanded that organization....Of what use is a CIA if they can't carry on anything in secret? How can they possible know where the Al Queda is doing if they can't infiltrate them with their operatives? You can't blame Bush, or even Clinton, for that......You can, however, blame the liberals. (and I do, brother, I do.) Blame whoever you want, but the absolute fact is that we were attacked, successfully, on Dumbya's watch. That makes it his fault. Deal with it. He's a total failure. |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
"William Graham" wrote in message news:OABdd.400632$mD.106439@attbi_s02... BTW, the only time in history what you describe has ever happened is on Dumbya's watch. maybe it's because he was on vacation for 42% of the time during the months leading up to 9/11. Yes, he wasn't even on the job. Perhaps not....But you can't say that Clinton, or the other recent presidents before him, were either....I can't speak for past mistakes, made by past AH's. All I can do is revere the one guy who has finally seen the light and is willing to put his money where his mouth is.....I will let you know more about that guy on November 3rd........ For God's sakes, Bill, stop trying to shift blame for Bush's total failures to others! We were successfully attacked on Bush's watch, that makes it his fault. He's s total screw up. |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
"William Graham" wrote in message news:OABdd.400632$mD.106439@attbi_s02... BTW, the only time in history what you describe has ever happened is on Dumbya's watch. maybe it's because he was on vacation for 42% of the time during the months leading up to 9/11. Yes, he wasn't even on the job. Perhaps not....But you can't say that Clinton, or the other recent presidents before him, were either....I can't speak for past mistakes, made by past AH's. All I can do is revere the one guy who has finally seen the light and is willing to put his money where his mouth is.....I will let you know more about that guy on November 3rd........ For God's sakes, Bill, stop trying to shift blame for Bush's total failures to others! We were successfully attacked on Bush's watch, that makes it his fault. He's s total screw up. |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
|
#97
|
|||
|
|||
|
#98
|
|||
|
|||
"B=F6wz=E9r" wrote:
You'll never convince William. He told me, in another thread, that the = US=20 should act as the world's police force. At that point, I left the=20 converstion, since all semblance of logic and intelligence flew out the= =20 window. What little was left, anyway. Has anybody seen a photography-related post by William Graham, lately? I'd be happy if, just once in a while amid all his OT political rants, he would write about something photographic. |
#99
|
|||
|
|||
"B=F6wz=E9r" wrote:
You'll never convince William. He told me, in another thread, that the = US=20 should act as the world's police force. At that point, I left the=20 converstion, since all semblance of logic and intelligence flew out the= =20 window. What little was left, anyway. Has anybody seen a photography-related post by William Graham, lately? I'd be happy if, just once in a while amid all his OT political rants, he would write about something photographic. |
#100
|
|||
|
|||
Bill Tuthill wrote:
Has anybody seen a photography-related post by William Graham, lately? I'd be happy if, just once in a while amid all his OT political rants, he would write about something photographic. Not me. 'Course, I haven't seen any of the rants either :-) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PUBLIC DATA - William Graham | William Graham | 35mm Photo Equipment | 0 | July 21st 04 07:37 AM |
Cowardly Groupline Cut #4 Ping Snuh: *TRUCE* - I'm being serious this time. | ß¡g ®êÞ Hë£müt | Digital Photography | 1 | July 17th 04 03:14 AM |
[SI] A reminder, and Ping Bandicoot | Al Denelsbeck | 35mm Photo Equipment | 1 | July 16th 04 03:23 AM |
Ping Rec.Photo.Digital | Daedalus | Digital Photography | 0 | July 8th 04 09:42 PM |
William E Graham Data | Mark M | 35mm Photo Equipment | 6 | June 16th 04 03:38 PM |