[SI] Dusk or Dawn is available mid day!

The Dusk or Dawn gallery is posted, and it's a very healthy gallery,
too. Some nice shots in there. Take a look, and offer a friendly
critique, if you dare.

http://www.pbase.com/shootin/duskdawn

Give the Shoot-In a try! Read all about it he

http://www.pbase.com/shootin/rulzpage

FYI: thanks to a request in one of the newsgroups, I've done a little
digging into the feasibility of increasing the max image size, and I
think we're OK to increase it. I'll post the new size limit in a
separate posting. Pbase has adjusted their limits (based on dollar
value) so we'll follow suit.

On 2011-09-13 23:40:58 +0100, Bowser said:

The Dusk or Dawn gallery is posted, and it's a very healthy gallery,
too. Some nice shots in there. Take a look, and offer a friendly
critique, if you dare.

http://www.pbase.com/shootin/duskdawn

Please note: I haven't changed my name to Dawn Petera, but someone did

On 9/13/2011 6:40 PM, Bowser wrote:
The Dusk or Dawn gallery is posted, and it's a very healthy gallery,
too. Some nice shots in there. Take a look, and offer a friendly
critique, if you dare.

http://www.pbase.com/shootin/duskdawn

Give the Shoot-In a try! Read all about it he

http://www.pbase.com/shootin/rulzpage

FYI: thanks to a request in one of the newsgroups, I've done a little
digging into the feasibility of increasing the max image size, and I
think we're OK to increase it. I'll post the new size limit in a
separate posting. Pbase has adjusted their limits (based on dollar
value) so we'll follow suit.


Oops. I think I accidentally sent you three images that were not
intended to be sent to the SI.

They are the images labeled c26. I see you got the correct ones too.
It's OK if you leave them up, but they really are OT.


--
Peter

On 2011-09-13 20:40:15 -0700, PeterN said:

On 9/13/2011 6:40 PM, Bowser wrote:
The Dusk or Dawn gallery is posted, and it's a very healthy gallery,
too. Some nice shots in there. Take a look, and offer a friendly
critique, if you dare.

http://www.pbase.com/shootin/duskdawn

Give the Shoot-In a try! Read all about it he

http://www.pbase.com/shootin/rulzpage

FYI: thanks to a request in one of the newsgroups, I've done a little
digging into the feasibility of increasing the max image size, and I
think we're OK to increase it. I'll post the new size limit in a
separate posting. Pbase has adjusted their limits (based on dollar
value) so we'll follow suit.


Oops. I think I accidentally sent you three images that were not
intended to be sent to the SI.

They are the images labeled c26. I see you got the correct ones too.
It's OK if you leave them up, but they really are OT.

I was thinking that myself.
There was a WTF moment when I saw those and tried to see how "dusk or
dawn" was going to fit.

--
Regards,

Savageduck

On 9/14/2011 12:09 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2011-09-13 20:40:15 -0700, PeterN said:

On 9/13/2011 6:40 PM, Bowser wrote:
The Dusk or Dawn gallery is posted, and it's a very healthy gallery,
too. Some nice shots in there. Take a look, and offer a friendly
critique, if you dare.

http://www.pbase.com/shootin/duskdawn

Give the Shoot-In a try! Read all about it he

http://www.pbase.com/shootin/rulzpage

FYI: thanks to a request in one of the newsgroups, I've done a little
digging into the feasibility of increasing the max image size, and I
think we're OK to increase it. I'll post the new size limit in a
separate posting. Pbase has adjusted their limits (based on dollar
value) so we'll follow suit.


Oops. I think I accidentally sent you three images that were not
intended to be sent to the SI.

They are the images labeled c26. I see you got the correct ones too.
It's OK if you leave them up, but they really are OT.

I was thinking that myself.
There was a WTF moment when I saw those and tried to see how "dusk or
dawn" was going to fit.


They obviously don't. I had been wondering why there was no
acknowledgement from their intended destination, and to be resent. Now
the mystery is solved.

--
Peter

On 9/14/2011 5:25 AM, Bruce wrote:
wrote:
On 2011-09-13 20:40:15 -0700, said:

On 9/13/2011 6:40 PM, Bowser wrote:
The Dusk or Dawn gallery is posted, and it's a very healthy gallery,
too. Some nice shots in there. Take a look, and offer a friendly
critique, if you dare.

http://www.pbase.com/shootin/duskdawn

Give the Shoot-In a try! Read all about it he

http://www.pbase.com/shootin/rulzpage

FYI: thanks to a request in one of the newsgroups, I've done a little
digging into the feasibility of increasing the max image size, and I
think we're OK to increase it. I'll post the new size limit in a
separate posting. Pbase has adjusted their limits (based on dollar
value) so we'll follow suit.


Oops. I think I accidentally sent you three images that were not
intended to be sent to the SI.

They are the images labeled c26. I see you got the correct ones too.
It's OK if you leave them up, but they really are OT.

I was thinking that myself.
There was a WTF moment when I saw those and tried to see how "dusk or
dawn" was going to fit.



Doesn't that just sum up the SI?

Someone submits three images that are completely unrelated to the
so-called "mandate", and they get accepted!

The SI is *so* bad, it's completely hilarious!


What is hilarious is that you make nasty comments about mistakes and
refuse to participate yourself. HEY get this, The SI is nothing more
than a forum for some, who are interested to display their work. If the
submission is not on the theme, so what. Ever;everyubody recognizes it
is such.


--
Peter

On 9/13/2011 11:33 PM, Pete A wrote:
On 2011-09-13 23:40:58 +0100, Bowser said:

The Dusk or Dawn gallery is posted, and it's a very healthy gallery,
too. Some nice shots in there. Take a look, and offer a friendly
critique, if you dare.

http://www.pbase.com/shootin/duskdawn

Please note: I haven't changed my name to Dawn Petera, but someone did


Yeah, Yahoo's mail system munged the file names, do I improvised.

On 9/13/2011 11:40 PM, PeterN wrote:
On 9/13/2011 6:40 PM, Bowser wrote:
The Dusk or Dawn gallery is posted, and it's a very healthy gallery,
too. Some nice shots in there. Take a look, and offer a friendly
critique, if you dare.

http://www.pbase.com/shootin/duskdawn

Give the Shoot-In a try! Read all about it he

http://www.pbase.com/shootin/rulzpage

FYI: thanks to a request in one of the newsgroups, I've done a little
digging into the feasibility of increasing the max image size, and I
think we're OK to increase it. I'll post the new size limit in a
separate posting. Pbase has adjusted their limits (based on dollar
value) so we'll follow suit.


Oops. I think I accidentally sent you three images that were not
intended to be sent to the SI.

They are the images labeled c26. I see you got the correct ones too.
It's OK if you leave them up, but they really are OT.



Dumped. Shoulda seen that.

On 9/14/2011 5:25 AM, Bruce wrote:
wrote:
On 2011-09-13 20:40:15 -0700, said:

On 9/13/2011 6:40 PM, Bowser wrote:
The Dusk or Dawn gallery is posted, and it's a very healthy gallery,
too. Some nice shots in there. Take a look, and offer a friendly
critique, if you dare.

http://www.pbase.com/shootin/duskdawn

Give the Shoot-In a try! Read all about it he

http://www.pbase.com/shootin/rulzpage

FYI: thanks to a request in one of the newsgroups, I've done a little
digging into the feasibility of increasing the max image size, and I
think we're OK to increase it. I'll post the new size limit in a
separate posting. Pbase has adjusted their limits (based on dollar
value) so we'll follow suit.


Oops. I think I accidentally sent you three images that were not
intended to be sent to the SI.

They are the images labeled c26. I see you got the correct ones too.
It's OK if you leave them up, but they really are OT.

I was thinking that myself.
There was a WTF moment when I saw those and tried to see how "dusk or
dawn" was going to fit.



Doesn't that just sum up the SI?

Someone submits three images that are completely unrelated to the
so-called "mandate", and they get accepted!

The SI is *so* bad, it's completely hilarious!




Yes, I included them in the Zip file I use to upload, so three got by.
They're gone. I've also removed all the shots you submitted, since they
were so horrifically bad I got tons of complaints about lowering the
standards of the SI, etc.

I thank you for not submitting anything!

On 9/14/2011 9:13 AM, PeterN wrote:
On 9/14/2011 5:25 AM, Bruce wrote:
wrote:
On 2011-09-13 20:40:15 -0700, said:

On 9/13/2011 6:40 PM, Bowser wrote:
The Dusk or Dawn gallery is posted, and it's a very healthy gallery,
too. Some nice shots in there. Take a look, and offer a friendly
critique, if you dare.

http://www.pbase.com/shootin/duskdawn

Give the Shoot-In a try! Read all about it he

http://www.pbase.com/shootin/rulzpage

FYI: thanks to a request in one of the newsgroups, I've done a little
digging into the feasibility of increasing the max image size, and I
think we're OK to increase it. I'll post the new size limit in a
separate posting. Pbase has adjusted their limits (based on dollar
value) so we'll follow suit.


Oops. I think I accidentally sent you three images that were not
intended to be sent to the SI.

They are the images labeled c26. I see you got the correct ones too.
It's OK if you leave them up, but they really are OT.

I was thinking that myself.
There was a WTF moment when I saw those and tried to see how "dusk or
dawn" was going to fit.



Doesn't that just sum up the SI?

Someone submits three images that are completely unrelated to the
so-called "mandate", and they get accepted!

The SI is *so* bad, it's completely hilarious!


What is hilarious is that you make nasty comments about mistakes and
refuse to participate yourself. HEY get this, The SI is nothing more
than a forum for some, who are interested to display their work. If the
submission is not on the theme, so what. Ever;everyubody recognizes it
is such.



The troll is afraid, nothing more. His fear of submitting his best work
and looking like a fool is driving his behavior. Pathetic, really.