If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon 18-200mm Lens in Stock for $799
Guys...Amazon has in Stock for $799 (Buy from Crutchfield Seller)
Here is the link http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00...SIN=B000BY52NU Crutchfield is a factory authorised seller & they are shipping July 5 (Free shipping). And there is no tax at amazon. So this is the best place to buy as of this day. I am in for one. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon 18-200mm Lens in Stock for $799
If you have not handled this lens you may be in for a surprise.
It is quite hefty. Literally a pain in the neck to carry around attached to a camera hanging from your neck. Optically the Nikon is not any better than Sigma/Tamron et al, although image stabilization is, admittedly, its undeniable asset. For what they are the quality of all these lenses is surprisingly good, especially at the longer end of the zoom range. Hence it is the only lens I am taking with me on a trip to Africa (well, a second camera will have an ultrawide zoom!). Enjoy your lens. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon 18-200mm Lens in Stock for $799
I don't find the lens heavy and I have small hands.
"babaloo" wrote in message t... : If you have not handled this lens you may be in for a surprise. : It is quite hefty. Literally a pain in the neck to carry around attached to : a camera hanging from your neck. : Optically the Nikon is not any better than Sigma/Tamron et al, although : image stabilization is, admittedly, its undeniable asset. : For what they are the quality of all these lenses is surprisingly good, : especially at the longer end of the zoom range. : Hence it is the only lens I am taking with me on a trip to Africa (well, a : second camera will have an ultrawide zoom!). : Enjoy your lens. : : |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon 18-200mm Lens in Stock for $799
On Sun, 1 Jul 2007 14:08:41 +1000, Joan wrote:
I don't find the lens heavy and I have small hands. Well sure. The lens would be harder to hold if you had large hands, as your muscles would have had to deal with the extra weight of your larger hands. g That said, the 18-200mm lens isn't so heavy that it can't be easily held. But I've sometimes walked for hours holding a small camera (a Fuji S5100 P&S that resembles a small DSLR) and it was so light that at times I wasn't even aware of holding it. I think that if the 18-200mm VR was mounted on the small D40, its weight would be quite noticeable if it was also carried around for a few hours. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon 18-200mm Lens in Stock for $799
I've had a D50 for about 18 months and now have a D80. Both cameras
are about the same size and weight. With the 18-200 it's just not a problem. "ASAAR" wrote in message ... : : Well sure. The lens would be harder to hold if you had large : hands, as your muscles would have had to deal with the extra weight : of your larger hands. g : : That said, the 18-200mm lens isn't so heavy that it can't be : easily held. But I've sometimes walked for hours holding a small : camera (a Fuji S5100 P&S that resembles a small DSLR) and it was so : light that at times I wasn't even aware of holding it. I think that : if the 18-200mm VR was mounted on the small D40, its weight would be : quite noticeable if it was also carried around for a few hours. : |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon 18-200mm Lens in Stock for $799
On Sun, 1 Jul 2007 16:25:09 +1000, Joan wrote:
: That said, the 18-200mm lens isn't so heavy that it can't be : easily held. I've had a D50 for about 18 months and now have a D80. Both cameras are about the same size and weight. With the 18-200 it's just not a problem. Agreed. Notice that I already said that? But as I also indicated, holding a camera for several hours is quite different than picking one up for short periods to take only a few shots. As mentioned, I can carry the light S5100 for hours without noticing its weight, which is only 340g. (0.748 lb.) The D80 and 18-200mm VR lens (but no battery) weighs 1145g. Do you really think that you could also lug that body and lens around for several hours without noticing its weight, which is a little more than 2 1/2 pounds? A liter bottle of water or Coca Cola weighs less than that. At 340g. the S5100 weighs about as much as a 12oz. can of Coke. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon 18-200mm Lens in Stock for $799
ASAAR wrote:
At 340g the S5100 weighs about as much as a 12oz. can of Coke. Is it an error that DP Review says it's 480g, or is that simply with and without batteries? http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fujifilms5100/ When you talk about carrying the camera for several hours, is that round your neck, in a shoulder bag, or what? The weight I carry is of concern to me as well. David |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon 18-200mm Lens in Stock for $799
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 07:53:37 GMT, David J Taylor wrote:
At 340g the S5100 weighs about as much as a 12oz. can of Coke. Is it an error that DP Review says it's 480g, or is that simply with and without batteries? The S5100's manual only provides the weight without batteries, at 340g. I also used the weight without battery for the D80, since Nikon's manual also gave it that way. I don't know if DPReview used alkaline or NiMH to get the 140g. for the four AA cells, but they probably weigh about the same. Hold on, I'll check the data sheets. Ok, DPReview used NiMH cells to get the weight up to 480g. According to Energizer's data sheets, NiMH == 30g., alkaline == 23g. and lithium == 14.5g. So with alkaline batteries the S5100 would have weighed 432g. and with lithiums, 398g. BTW, as I've said before, SMS is mistaken when he says that lithium batteries have much greater energy density by weight and by volume. I agreed about the weight, but said that NiMH's volume remained nearly constant but nearly tripled in capacity since the early NiMH cells. The high capacity NiMH cells are now at least up to 2,700mAh and Energizer's lithium batteries are rated at 3,000mAh. I've also noted before that lithiums can last much longer than alkalines in some cameras, but not much more in others. Unlike the other types which don't change *too* much at different current levels, alkalines are very sensitive to current. They're rated from 1,500mAh @ 500ma to 2,500 @ 100ma and 2,900mAh at 50ma. That's why the little analog radios can last so long using alkaline AA batteries, since at what I call moderate volume (and others might call low volume) they can draw less than 15ma from the batteries. Used this way, lithium batteries wouldn't power the radios much longer than alkaline batteries are able to. It's also why it doesn't pay to use lithium 9v batteries in smoke detectors. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon 18-200mm Lens in Stock for $799
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 07:53:37 GMT, David J Taylor wrote:
When you talk about carrying the camera for several hours, is that round your neck, in a shoulder bag, or what? The weight I carry is of concern to me as well. Oops. I posted my last before I noticed this part of your reply. I don't wear it around my neck or carry it in a shoulder bag. I hold it in one hand - it has a short strap attached that's slightly larger than my hand. I occasionally carry it in a small Tamrac camera bag, but the bag is a very small one, only able to hold the camera, with a front pocket barely large enough to carry a spare set of batteries, (usually left home) and a filter in a mesh compartment in the top lid. And I've tossed the bag's neck strap and carry it only using the small handle attached to the bag's lid. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon 18-200mm Lens in Stock for $799
ASAAR wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 07:53:37 GMT, David J Taylor wrote: When you talk about carrying the camera for several hours, is that round your neck, in a shoulder bag, or what? The weight I carry is of concern to me as well. Oops. I posted my last before I noticed this part of your reply. I don't wear it around my neck or carry it in a shoulder bag. I hold it in one hand - it has a short strap attached that's slightly larger than my hand. I occasionally carry it in a small Tamrac camera bag, but the bag is a very small one, only able to hold the camera, with a front pocket barely large enough to carry a spare set of batteries, (usually left home) and a filter in a mesh compartment in the top lid. And I've tossed the bag's neck strap and carry it only using the small handle attached to the bag's lid. Thanks, ASAAR. I normally carry a small camera bag on the shoulder, with room for two small cameras, spare CF/SD cards, batteries etc. Hand-holding a DSLR and lens compared to the Fuji would be a significant difference. Like you, most of my trips are on foot rather than in a car with brief stops. On geology trips, lunch is carried as well. Cheers, David |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FA: Nikon DX 55-200mm lens - new in box | JBarnes | Digital Photo Equipment For Sale | 1 | March 18th 07 02:12 PM |
FS in Ottawa Canada nikon F80 / nikon lens / sigma lens / kirk shoulder stock / nikon battery pack | Michel | General Equipment For Sale | 1 | October 2nd 05 01:57 PM |
FS in Ottawa Canada nikon F80 / nikon lens / sigma lens / kirk shoulder stock / nikon battery pack | Michel | 35mm Equipment for Sale | 1 | October 2nd 05 01:57 PM |
Manual (or some help) for Nikon 80-200mm f/2.8 lens | john | 35mm Photo Equipment | 1 | July 12th 04 06:03 AM |
FS: NIKON 35-200mm AIs Lens EXC.+ | Nelson | 35mm Equipment for Sale | 0 | November 7th 03 05:58 AM |