If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Canon camera and service.
Rich wrote:
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 14:14:14 GMT, 223rem wrote: Joseph Chamberlain, DDS wrote: [bs snipped] Pretty good troll! Very low calibre response. Low caliber (223!) but bull's eye. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Canon camera and service.
Canon like any other manufacturer, cannot guarantee the state of a
product after it leaves there factory. Canon control the length of time it takes a unit to be sold or the 'newness' of a product. I expect they have no way to differentiate a $1,000 350D to a $10,000 1DS... it's all a serialised product. If you camera came out of the box sealed, takes good pictures, serialises your pictures "IMG0001.JPG", what else do you want from a lowly paid tech. rep.? If you wanna talk poor service, try Kodak. T. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Canon camera and service.
I wish to thank all those who provided helpful and insightful feedback and
replies to my post (I will just ignore the idiots who don't have anything better to do than waste other people's time by posting derogatory and stupid remarks). I share Cockpit Colin's, DD's, Thomas Muller's, David Geesaman's, Dave R's and T's views on customer service and support - for the most part anyway. I still think companies have the obligation to offer differential support for their pro, more expensive line of cameras and other photo products. Every call I have made to the two leading manufacturers of photo equipment (we know who they are) have left me disappointed as I found myself speaking with someone who knew less about photography than I do (and I am not a photographer). But I don't wish to beat this already dead horse. Thank you again to all the good feedback and replies I have received. The overall outcome of my newsgroup searches have brought me to some interesting findings: 1. I have been able to locate a company in Germany that sells software able to read from the EXIF file generated by the camera the exact number of times the shutter has been released. This is a specific version for Macs and that only works on Canon's line of high end cameras (EOS 1D, 1Ds, 1Ds MK II, ....). 2. I have learned about dead pixels and hot pixels. I have also learned how to count them, the role of firmware in eliminating these dead and/or hot pixels, software that can review the images and analyze the presence of these hot pixels, and software that can remove the hot pixels from images (especially those that have been acquired with longer exposure times). Best regards, Joseph --- Dr. Joseph Chamberlain Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On 10/27/05 9:21 PM, in article , " wrote: Canon like any other manufacturer, cannot guarantee the state of a product after it leaves there factory. Canon control the length of time it takes a unit to be sold or the 'newness' of a product. I expect they have no way to differentiate a $1,000 350D to a $10,000 1DS... it's all a serialised product. If you camera came out of the box sealed, takes good pictures, serialises your pictures "IMG0001.JPG", what else do you want from a lowly paid tech. rep.? If you wanna talk poor service, try Kodak. T. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Canon camera and service.
"David Geesaman" wrote in message ... Colin, you're in a thinning group. Yes, there are fuller-service stores that add value by supporting before and after the sale. Yes, their prices are higher. But the fact of the matter is most consumers can't/don't want to pay the extra. Most consumers do their shopping/evaluation in one place, and then buy for the lowest price (within reasonable risk). Certainly, the old model is not gone, but it's waning. Profit margins are going down due to Internet pricing pressures, and stock (and local sales) is decreasing because of the rapid turnover of technology. There used to be many camera shops, and now in my area each small city has just one - and those shops are getting pinched really hard. So at some point you might find yourself paying much more for that full-service seller, or not find that seller at all. Do I like it? No, but as a consumer I have to be aware of the reality of it in order to make intelligent purchases. And if consumers remain unaware of the trend, they might not realize what they're missing. Maybe yes, maybe no. I don't think it's the consumer group that's getting smaller per sec - I think it's the fact that that the retailers have lost the age-old-art of selling: Being cheaper than the next guy is the only way they know how to close a sale - they know nothing about building relationships - marginal net worth - back ending - host beneficiary relationships - referral mechanisms - or even how to write an advertisement that works. They trot out the same (tired) mantra day after day. They all like to think that they provide good service, but in reality it's only because they don't know just how much they don't know. How many salemen would admit to being rude / disinterested / unreliable? Not many - and yet this is the perception of many of their customers. I'm involved in the IT "game", which I think is just as cut throat as the camera market. I charge my time out at $120 per hour (-v- around an average of $85 per hour for many of my competitors) - and yet I don't get any objections to my prices. I used to be in the First Aid industry where my courses cost around 50% more than those of my competition, and yet I don't recall losing many sales to the "competition". I've been responsible for running an Aero club - we had to put the prices up around 8% - staff complained that there would be a backlash from the customers - interestingly a mistake was make with the accounting system that added another 12.5% on top of the 8% without staff realising - guess what - none of the customers even noticed! Study after study keeps revealing that salesmen believe price to be far more of a consideration than does the customer. So if the competition advertises a camera for $1299 he advertises it for $1249 - the customer sees the same camera at two different prices, and guess which one he goes for - because there was no perceived difference. Many times I too have tried to go for the cheapest - it usually doesn't take long to discover that many of them won't take my credit card - or they won't ship to my country - or they won't send it fedex - or in many other cases they won't even return emails - all examples of bad service. Guess what? When I find someone who WILL take PayPal or my CC - who will ship to my country - who will use Fedex - who takes the time to answer my eMails (even when it's to say "I don't know - but I'll find out and get back to you tomorrow" (and he does)) - he gets the order - and guess who I'll be going to first next time. Was he the cheapest? No. That's the dynamic many retailers just don't seem to get - by tripping over each other to be the cheapest they end up "saving" the customer 5%, but cut their own margins by 30% - Even if they knew what good service was they wouldn't be able to afford the time to give it. Am I part of a dying group? I don't know - what I do know is that there are a hell of a lot more people who think like me than any salesman appears to be aware of. Just my 10c worth. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Canon camera and service.
"Cockpit Colin" wrote in message
... Am I part of a dying group? I don't know - what I do know is that there are a hell of a lot more people who think like me than any salesman appears to be aware of. I think that sums it up pretty well. I think the eBay/Internet pricing age has put these retailers in a new position, and like you said, they need to play their cards differently. Most of them point to the price difference and assume it's the reason - and so they cut staff and pay them less, offering even less to customers. Last spring I stopped by a local camera store to pick up my first non-kit lens. I ended up walking out with a Tamron 75-300 - not fancy, but in my price range and it served me well. But unfortunately the guy didn't give me hardly any time of day until I asked, and seemed to care little or nothing about what I was using it for. He provided little information. I think he assumed I would be like many others who just bought a 300D - ignorant and never learning. When I left it was clear why these stores are a dying breed in my locale. Dave |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Canon camera and service.
"David Geesaman" wrote in message When I left it was clear why these stores are a dying breed in my locale. I remember when we got our first "SuperStore" in our little city - local retailers were crying that it'll mean an "end to their small businesses" - and that "big business will murder them" One astute person pointed out that with attitudes like that it would well mean the end of their little businesses, but if this does happen, it will be suicide, not murder. Honestly, I find so many retailers really irritate me - they're simply not interested in their customers needs. They all assume it's all about price - persoanlly, I wish they'd all just get back to the basics. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NIKON USA--TERRIBLE SERVICE EXPERIENCE. | Aguilabrava | 35mm Photo Equipment | 134 | December 17th 04 04:00 AM |
Digital zoom camera & lots of selection questions | Lou | Digital Photography | 5 | November 12th 04 12:43 AM |
Quick Canon EOS 300D/ Digital Rebel Review | Todd H. | Digital Photography | 0 | September 21st 04 10:41 PM |
Sony Cybershot DSC-W1... Bad Camera...Bad Customer Service by Sony... Read on... | unavailable | 35mm Photo Equipment | 38 | June 29th 04 06:45 AM |
B&H Photo has horrible customer service... | generic eric | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 13 | January 31st 04 09:25 PM |