If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
best RAW converter to recover blown / overexposed highlights
Hi All
As above really! What the best RAW converter to recover blown / overexposed highlights. Cheers Digi |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I've had good results from Breeze Browser, but nothing can save a totally
overexposed shot. digiboy wrote: Hi All As above really! What the best RAW converter to recover blown / overexposed highlights. Cheers Digi |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
digiboy wrote:
As above really! What the best RAW converter to recover blown / overexposed highlights. I haven't compared them, so I can't say which is "best", but Photoshop Camera Raw is pretty good at pulling *something* out of blown highlights, as long as all three channels aren't clipped, of course (if they are, then there is no hope). -- Jeremy | |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"digiboy" wrote in message om... Hi All As above really! What the best RAW converter to recover blown / overexposed highlights. Cheers C1 (Capture One) and Photoshop CS both do a great job at this. It really is amazing what poorly metered shots you can rescue. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
The best RAW converter by a long way is Compact One by Phase One. It's not
freeware but it does a far better job than anything else currently available. Regards "digiboy" wrote in message om... Hi All As above really! What the best RAW converter to recover blown / overexposed highlights. Cheers Digi |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"MB" wrote in message ... The best RAW converter by a long way is Compact One by Phase One. It's not freeware but it does a far better job than anything else currently available. Regards Don't you mean "Capture One"?? "digiboy" wrote in message om... Hi All As above really! What the best RAW converter to recover blown / overexposed highlights. Cheers Digi |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Mark M wrote:
"MB" wrote in message ... The best RAW converter by a long way is Compact One by Phase One. It's not freeware but it does a far better job than anything else currently available. Don't you mean "Capture One"?? Could you define "best" a bit? And by what measures does it do anything "far better"? -- John McWilliams |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
In message h7M7d.12871$Hz.4901@fed1read04,
"Mark M" wrote: "digiboy" wrote in message . com... Hi All As above really! What the best RAW converter to recover blown / overexposed highlights. Cheers C1 (Capture One) and Photoshop CS both do a great job at this. It really is amazing what poorly metered shots you can rescue. It is also nice that if you know this headroom is there, you can use it to your advantage. The noise in the 10D due to amplification and readout is low up until ISO 400, so if you are in a situation where you have a very low contrast subject, and were going to shoot at ISO 100, you might shoot at ISO 400 instead and "overexpose" by two stops, to get two extra bits of precision in the image, with almost no extra noise. -- John P Sheehy |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
As above really! What the best RAW converter to recover blown /
overexposed highlights. You can use a RAW converter to convert the file to a 3*16 Bit format (e.g. as TIFF or JP2, e.g. Thumbs + 2000 can do this). This does not lose any brightness resolution and you can use a 16 bit aware appropriate editor program (e.g. within Thumbs+) to tweak the lightness. -Michael |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message news In message h7M7d.12871$Hz.4901@fed1read04, "Mark M" wrote: "digiboy" wrote in message . com... Hi All As above really! What the best RAW converter to recover blown / overexposed highlights. Cheers C1 (Capture One) and Photoshop CS both do a great job at this. It really is amazing what poorly metered shots you can rescue. It is also nice that if you know this headroom is there, you can use it to your advantage. The noise in the 10D due to amplification and readout is low up until ISO 400, so if you are in a situation where you have a very low contrast subject, and were going to shoot at ISO 100, you might shoot at ISO 400 instead and "overexpose" by two stops, to get two extra bits of precision in the image, with almost no extra noise. Yes. Sort of like pushing and pulling film... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Blown Highlights With Wedding Dress Photo | Larry R Harrison Jr | Digital Photography | 146 | October 1st 04 04:29 PM |
Blown Out Highlights Question | Charles Schuler | Digital Photography | 25 | August 16th 04 09:49 AM |
Kenko 0.16x Fish-eye Converter | Nostrobino | Digital Photography | 10 | August 13th 04 05:34 PM |
Kodak on Variable Film Development: NO! | Michael Scarpitti | In The Darkroom | 276 | August 12th 04 10:42 PM |
Kenko 0.16x Fish-eye Converter | Nostrobino | 35mm Photo Equipment | 2 | August 11th 04 04:38 PM |