A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital SLR Cameras
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Contrast range and Nikanon or Canikon debate



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 30th 05, 12:37 AM
pixby
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Contrast range and Nikanon or Canikon debate

From a Photographers point of view, a camera is just a tool. The
sharper the chisel, the neater the cut, so to speak. PhotoShop is the
workbench we put our images on to craft them after we harvest the raw
materials.

OK...
So I have a bunch of Canon gear and a lone Nikon camera with just one
lens. I predominately shoot weddings but do a lot of landscapes too. One
thing I know is that Photoshop has a couple of stops of additional
contrast range available through it's "shadow/highlights" filter which
goes a long way towards evening up the disadvantage DSLRs have when
compared to the range of film.

I can always find some detail in black trousers against a white dress
with Photoshop from my 20D and 1D files. I don't like Canon's idea of
skin tones but that's why I bought a Nikon a few weeks ago.

So here's one of the things I have found when comparing the two... I
reckon Nikon's new 'bayer' sensor doesn't have as wide a contrast range
as the Canon gives me, having regard for the Photoshop recovery I use.
Magnificent in ever way but I'm not able (after 2 weeks of trying) to
expand the contrast range as far as I can from a Canon image by using
Photoshop after the shoot. Has anyone else noticed this?

--
Douglas,
You never really make it on the 'net
until you get your own personal Troll.
Mine's called Chrlz. Don't feed him, he bites!
  #2  
Old August 30th 05, 02:03 AM
Jeremy Nixon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

pixby wrote:

So here's one of the things I have found when comparing the two... I
reckon Nikon's new 'bayer' sensor doesn't have as wide a contrast range
as the Canon gives me, having regard for the Photoshop recovery I use.
Magnificent in ever way but I'm not able (after 2 weeks of trying) to
expand the contrast range as far as I can from a Canon image by using
Photoshop after the shoot. Has anyone else noticed this?


Are you trying to pull it out in the RAW conversion, or in Photoshop
proper? If the latter, you're at the mercy of whatever you did in the
RAW conversion step, which may or may not have clipped your shadow
detail away. If it did, then it's gone, and that's it. If you're
shooting to JPEG, well, don't do that.

You want to be doing an adjustment like that in Camera Raw, where you
have access to everything the camera recorded. Also, if the trousers
are black, err on the side of overexposure by a third or two-thirds of
a stop; yeah, I know that's supposed to be wrong, but you'll be
surprised and delighted to see just how much highlight detail the
thing records and how much headroom you've got. Provided you're using
*uncompressed* RAW; compressed RAW achieves the compression by losing
detail in the highlights. Don't try this with a D70. The difference
is significant.

--
Jeremy |
  #3  
Old August 31st 05, 01:49 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In message ,
pixby wrote:

So here's one of the things I have found when comparing the two... I
reckon Nikon's new 'bayer' sensor doesn't have as wide a contrast range
as the Canon gives me, having regard for the Photoshop recovery I use.
Magnificent in ever way but I'm not able (after 2 weeks of trying) to
expand the contrast range as far as I can from a Canon image by using
Photoshop after the shoot. Has anyone else noticed this?


The limiting factor is going to be the noise level, and the difference
between the channels in sensitivity. Some of the Nikon models differ by
almost a stop and a half between RAW color channels.
--


John P Sheehy

  #5  
Old August 31st 05, 03:21 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In message ,
pixby wrote:

The main area I've had trouble with is black and dark blue clothing.
Deep shadows have some detail I can recover although it appears as you
say, a noise factor as to how much can be recovered.


Where are the highlights?

Have you tried with lower-than-stated exposure indices?
--


John P Sheehy

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.