A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Nikon D100 vs. Fuji Velvia



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old June 24th 04, 03:12 PM
Mike Kohary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Nikon D100 vs. Fuji Velvia

Orville Wright wrote:

The Sigma SD and SA camera lines generally do not require the use of a
tripod unless you are doing a long exposure over 1 second. Images are
always tack sharp. There is some mystery feature built into the Sigma
camera bodies that prevent camera shake. Of course, Sigma does not
need to brag like Canon or Minolta by throwing a "IS" or "AS" in front
of the camera.


That's all complete nonsense. No camera prevents shake; there is no
"mystery feature". IS systems mitigate shake, but nothing eliminates it -
your hand shakes, period. You do a great disservice to people on these
newsgroups who are new to the subject of photography by feeding them such
gross misinformation.

Mike


  #12  
Old June 24th 04, 04:29 PM
dylan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Nikon D100 vs. Fuji Velvia

Of course he does, it's George(tte) Preddy, new name same old rubbish.

"FuTAnT" wrote in message
om.au...
Orville Wright wrote:

rant

Sigma SD10 blah blah blah Foveon Blah blah....

/rant

Orville


Do you have that thing saved so you just cut n paste whenever anyone asks
anything about a digital camera?

Cam




  #13  
Old June 24th 04, 05:23 PM
David Kilpatrick
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Nikon D100 vs. Fuji Velvia



Ron wrote:

"Alex A." wrote in message
...

no no, it's the 'coveted' foveon



I thought it was the Foveon coven.

The camera was, of course, voted as best by Witch! magazine

  #14  
Old June 24th 04, 05:46 PM
adm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Nikon D100 vs. Fuji Velvia


"David Kilpatrick" wrote in message
...


Ron wrote:

"Alex A." wrote in message
...

no no, it's the 'coveted' foveon



I thought it was the Foveon coven.

The camera was, of course, voted as best by Witch! magazine


It renders those cheesy witchy skin tones just perfectly.



  #16  
Old June 24th 04, 11:38 PM
Greg Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Nikon D100 vs. Fuji Velvia

Alex A. wrote:

no no, it's the 'coveted' foveon


Foveon, the (coveted) Silver Sow of digital photography! :P

"They're hitting the ground like bags of wet cement!"
"Oh! The Humanity!"

"As god is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly."

-Greg
  #17  
Old June 25th 04, 09:38 AM
Willie wjb
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Nikon D100 vs. Fuji Velvia

you got me there..

"Dennis Bradley" wrote in
message ...

"Willie wjb" wrote in message
...
snipped..
..
So i do what i like and when someone asks for the 1000 time why are you

not
working digital, i tell them i am an artist, not a scientist.

I would have thought you were closer to science with all that chemistry
involved in film photography :-)

Dennis




  #18  
Old June 25th 04, 10:34 AM
Pepys
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Nikon D100 vs. Fuji Velvia


"Willie wjb" wrote in message
...
you can't compaire analog with digital. It's a total different medium.

i am an artist, not a scientist.


Bull**** artist most likely


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.