A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Olympus sticking with m4/3rds?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old December 16th 18, 10:58 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Savageduck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,487
Default Olympus sticking with m4/3rds?

On Dec 16, 2018, Savageduck wrote
(in iganews.com):

On Dec 16, 2018, newshound wrote
(in articleptGdnflJQ4OTXovBnZ2dnUU78IHNnZ2d@brightvie w.co.uk):

On 16/12/2018 21:13, Savageduck wrote:
On Dec 16, 2018, newshound wrote
(in articlesoydnYsoKMO0JYvBnZ2dnUU78QXNnZ2d@brightvie w.co.uk):

On 16/12/2018 14:28, Savageduck wrote:
On Dec 16, 2018, newshound wrote
(in articleFamdnaQURdVU3ovBnZ2dnUU78eWdnZ2d@brightvie w.co.uk):

On 16/12/2018 00:11, Savageduck wrote:

Nikkor, especially FF Nikkor glass. Though I have to admit some of the
latest top end Fuji glass is not exactly inexpensive.

We'll all have to stop raving about how good it is!

(Currently a bit scared of my new X-T3)

-)

Aah! You pulled the trigger on the X-T3. The performance improvement over
the X-T2 is quite amazing. Enjoy.

BTW; I had to treat mine to some new glass so I bought a used XF16-55mm
f/2.8, so with my other Fuji glass I have a set up which is every bit a
match for the FF cameras from Nikon, Canon, and Sony at a massive discount.
I shall get the 100-400 in the spring. I was a bit disappointed that
using the cheap XC 50-230 at full stretch the autofocus wasn't quite
getting it right. This wasn't high speed stuff at all. But obviously I
do need to practice and explore all the (many) options more carefully. I
am also looking forward to trying the video with the advantage of an
external mike socket. I currently use a Tascam recorder for main audio
with a static Canon video camera, and the Fuji XE-1 to do "infill"
clips, all manually synchronised. (This is recording live music, but
with a bluetooth feed off the desk to the Tascam).

I'm certainly tempted by the 16-55 too.

I bought the 100-400mm back when the sales season started in September, and
it does a great job.

This was with the X-T2 before the X-T3 was delivered.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/dh8q323iuyle153/DSCF6922-E2.jpg

Back when I first bought my X-E2 I had considered the XC50-230mm, but
bought the 55-200mm with a $200 discount some 2 years ago, and I am very pleased
with what that has delivered.

Also an X-T2 shot.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/xwwov7yanz74rem/DSF6645R1E3.jpg

Impressive. I bought my tele with an X-E1 about 4 years ago. I got the
10-24 when it was on offer instead. I like a really wide lens for
indoors because you can frame to crop well off-centre and keep walls and
ceilings perpendicular. Yes I know you can do all that in software too,
these days, but I am old fashioned.


Agreed. However, I don’t do too much indoors.

I also have the 16mm f/1.4 which is probably the best glass I have ever
owned, and does great service on both the X-T3, & X-E3 (though it looks a
bit out of place on the X-E3). Back in October just after I got the X-T3, I
took both bodies to an airshow. Here is the sort of thing I got from the X-E3
+16mm, and one shot with the X-T3 + 100-400mm, but a little closer in.

X-E3 + 16mm:
https://photos.smugmug.com/photos/i-HZnLNSH/0/f0ede005/X3/i-HZnLNSH-X3.jpg
https://photos.smugmug.com/photos/i-zNMfRMX/0/584ebac3/X3/i-zNMfRMX-X3.jpg

X-T3 + 100-400mm:
https://photos.smugmug.com/photos/i-5BVS6kb/0/c4ba530f/X3/i-5BVS6kb-X3.jpg


BTW; The 55-200mm + X-T3 does pretty well in 11fps burst mode with AF-C.

https://photos.smugmug.com/photos/i-5BVS6kb/0/c4ba530f/X3/i-5BVS6kb-X3.jpg

--
Regards,
Savageduck

  #12  
Old December 16th 18, 11:00 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Savageduck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,487
Default Olympus sticking with m4/3rds?

On Dec 16, 2018, Savageduck wrote
(in iganews.com):

On Dec 16, 2018, Savageduck wrote
(in iganews.com):

On Dec 16, 2018, newshound wrote
(in articleptGdnflJQ4OTXovBnZ2dnUU78IHNnZ2d@brightvie w.co.uk):

On 16/12/2018 21:13, Savageduck wrote:
On Dec 16, 2018, newshound wrote
(in articlesoydnYsoKMO0JYvBnZ2dnUU78QXNnZ2d@brightvie w.co.uk):

On 16/12/2018 14:28, Savageduck wrote:
On Dec 16, 2018, newshound wrote
(in articleFamdnaQURdVU3ovBnZ2dnUU78eWdnZ2d@brightvie w.co.uk):

On 16/12/2018 00:11, Savageduck wrote:

Nikkor, especially FF Nikkor glass. Though I have to admit some of the
latest top end Fuji glass is not exactly inexpensive.

We'll all have to stop raving about how good it is!

(Currently a bit scared of my new X-T3)

-)

Aah! You pulled the trigger on the X-T3. The performance improvement
over the X-T2 is quite amazing. Enjoy.

BTW; I had to treat mine to some new glass so I bought a used XF16-55mm
f/2.8, so with my other Fuji glass I have a set up which is every bit a
match for the FF cameras from Nikon, Canon, and Sony at a massive
discount.
I shall get the 100-400 in the spring. I was a bit disappointed that
using the cheap XC 50-230 at full stretch the autofocus wasn't quite
getting it right. This wasn't high speed stuff at all. But obviously I
do need to practice and explore all the (many) options more carefully. I
am also looking forward to trying the video with the advantage of an
external mike socket. I currently use a Tascam recorder for main audio
with a static Canon video camera, and the Fuji XE-1 to do "infill"
clips, all manually synchronised. (This is recording live music, but
with a bluetooth feed off the desk to the Tascam).

I'm certainly tempted by the 16-55 too.

I bought the 100-400mm back when the sales season started in September,
and it does a great job.

This was with the X-T2 before the X-T3 was delivered.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/dh8q323iuyle153/DSCF6922-E2.jpg

Back when I first bought my X-E2 I had considered the XC50-230mm, but
bought the 55-200mm with a $200 discount some 2 years ago, and I am very
pleased with what that has delivered.

Also an X-T2 shot.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/xwwov7yanz74rem/DSF6645R1E3.jpg
Impressive. I bought my tele with an X-E1 about 4 years ago. I got the
10-24 when it was on offer instead. I like a really wide lens for
indoors because you can frame to crop well off-centre and keep walls and
ceilings perpendicular. Yes I know you can do all that in software too,
these days, but I am old fashioned.


Agreed. However, I don’t do too much indoors.

I also have the 16mm f/1.4 which is probably the best glass I have ever
owned, and does great service on both the X-T3, & X-E3 (though it looks a
bit out of place on the X-E3). Back in October just after I got the X-T3, I
took both bodies to an airshow. Here is the sort of thing I got from the
X-E3 +16mm, and one shot with the X-T3 + 100-400mm, but a little closer in.

X-E3 + 16mm:
https://photos.smugmug.com/photos/i-HZnLNSH/0/f0ede005/X3/i-HZnLNSH-X3.jpg
https://photos.smugmug.com/photos/i-zNMfRMX/0/584ebac3/X3/i-zNMfRMX-X3.jpg

X-T3 + 100-400mm:
https://photos.smugmug.com/photos/i-5BVS6kb/0/c4ba530f/X3/i-5BVS6kb-X3.jpg


BTW; The 55-200mm + X-T3 does pretty well in 11fps burst mode with AF-C.

https://photos.smugmug.com/photos/i-5BVS6kb/0/c4ba530f/X3/i-5BVS6kb-X3.jpg


Oops! Wrong URL.

https://photos.smugmug.com/X-T3-Burs...1/X3/DSCF0283-
X3.jpg

--
Regards,
Savageduck

  #13  
Old December 17th 18, 01:54 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
newshound
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 458
Default Olympus sticking with m4/3rds?

On 16/12/2018 22:00, Savageduck wrote:
On Dec 16, 2018, Savageduck wrote
(in iganews.com):

On Dec 16, 2018, Savageduck wrote
(in iganews.com):

On Dec 16, 2018, newshound wrote
(in articleptGdnflJQ4OTXovBnZ2dnUU78IHNnZ2d@brightvie w.co.uk):

On 16/12/2018 21:13, Savageduck wrote:
On Dec 16, 2018, newshound wrote
(in articlesoydnYsoKMO0JYvBnZ2dnUU78QXNnZ2d@brightvie w.co.uk):

On 16/12/2018 14:28, Savageduck wrote:
On Dec 16, 2018, newshound wrote
(in articleFamdnaQURdVU3ovBnZ2dnUU78eWdnZ2d@brightvie w.co.uk):

On 16/12/2018 00:11, Savageduck wrote:

Nikkor, especially FF Nikkor glass. Though I have to admit some of the
latest top end Fuji glass is not exactly inexpensive.

We'll all have to stop raving about how good it is!

(Currently a bit scared of my new X-T3)

-)

Aah! You pulled the trigger on the X-T3. The performance improvement
over the X-T2 is quite amazing. Enjoy.

BTW; I had to treat mine to some new glass so I bought a used XF16-55mm
f/2.8, so with my other Fuji glass I have a set up which is every bit a
match for the FF cameras from Nikon, Canon, and Sony at a massive
discount.
I shall get the 100-400 in the spring. I was a bit disappointed that
using the cheap XC 50-230 at full stretch the autofocus wasn't quite
getting it right. This wasn't high speed stuff at all. But obviously I
do need to practice and explore all the (many) options more carefully. I
am also looking forward to trying the video with the advantage of an
external mike socket. I currently use a Tascam recorder for main audio
with a static Canon video camera, and the Fuji XE-1 to do "infill"
clips, all manually synchronised. (This is recording live music, but
with a bluetooth feed off the desk to the Tascam).

I'm certainly tempted by the 16-55 too.

I bought the 100-400mm back when the sales season started in September,
and it does a great job.

This was with the X-T2 before the X-T3 was delivered.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/dh8q323iuyle153/DSCF6922-E2.jpg

Back when I first bought my X-E2 I had considered the XC50-230mm, but
bought the 55-200mm with a $200 discount some 2 years ago, and I am very
pleased with what that has delivered.

Also an X-T2 shot.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/xwwov7yanz74rem/DSF6645R1E3.jpg
Impressive. I bought my tele with an X-E1 about 4 years ago. I got the
10-24 when it was on offer instead. I like a really wide lens for
indoors because you can frame to crop well off-centre and keep walls and
ceilings perpendicular. Yes I know you can do all that in software too,
these days, but I am old fashioned.

Agreed. However, I don’t do too much indoors.

I also have the 16mm f/1.4 which is probably the best glass I have ever
owned, and does great service on both the X-T3, & X-E3 (though it looks a
bit out of place on the X-E3). Back in October just after I got the X-T3, I
took both bodies to an airshow. Here is the sort of thing I got from the
X-E3 +16mm, and one shot with the X-T3 + 100-400mm, but a little closer in.

X-E3 + 16mm:
https://photos.smugmug.com/photos/i-HZnLNSH/0/f0ede005/X3/i-HZnLNSH-X3.jpg
https://photos.smugmug.com/photos/i-zNMfRMX/0/584ebac3/X3/i-zNMfRMX-X3.jpg

X-T3 + 100-400mm:
https://photos.smugmug.com/photos/i-5BVS6kb/0/c4ba530f/X3/i-5BVS6kb-X3.jpg


BTW; The 55-200mm + X-T3 does pretty well in 11fps burst mode with AF-C.

https://photos.smugmug.com/photos/i-5BVS6kb/0/c4ba530f/X3/i-5BVS6kb-X3.jpg


Oops! Wrong URL.

https://photos.smugmug.com/X-T3-Burs...1/X3/DSCF0283-
X3.jpg

All nice, but especially the hummer, thanks!
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Olympus sticking with m4/3rds? Neil[_9_] Digital Photography 0 December 15th 18 11:40 AM
Sigma bails on Olympus 4/3rds Bowser Digital SLR Cameras 13 March 6th 12 10:23 PM
As the "S/S Olympus 4/3rds" ship sinks, (Olympus abandoned it), the crew get more violent! R. Mark Clayton Digital SLR Cameras 7 October 6th 10 06:04 PM
Olympus 4/3rds advantages fading [email protected] Digital SLR Cameras 32 September 27th 09 07:51 PM
Olympus 4/3rds advantages fading lebouef Digital SLR Cameras 0 September 19th 09 04:47 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.