If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Light Meter Spectral Response
I suspect the older zoom meter I'm using is overly
responsive to green. Is it quite usuall for meters to favor some color more than others? Dan |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Light Meter Spectral Response
sure, response curves vary a lot, a peak in the green region is considered desirable because the human eye responds strongly to yellow-green lighting (shades of our arboreal ancestors? ;-0) see notes at http://medfmt.8k.com/mf/meters.html etc. hth bobm -- ************************************************** ********************* * Robert Monaghan POB 752182 Southern Methodist Univ. Dallas Tx 75275 * ********************Standard Disclaimers Apply************************* |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Light Meter Spectral Response
Bob Monaghan wrote:
[...] a peak in the green region is considered desirable because the human eye responds strongly to yellow-green lighting (shades of our arboreal ancestors? ;-0) If film's (the thing in the chain between scene and human eye) spectral sensitivity mimics our eye's response, then it's desirable that meters do the same. And that may or may not always be the case. Looking at some randomly chosen film spectral response charts, i get the distinct impression that manufacturers aim to produce films that have a flat response curve. If so (and i always understood that it indeed is so) it would be desirable if meter's response does not (!) mimic our atavistic eyes. So my answer would be the opposite: "a peak in the green region is considered [NOT to be] desirable" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Light Meter Spectral Response
Q.G. de Bakker wrote:
Bob Monaghan wrote: [...] a peak in the green region is considered desirable because the human eye responds strongly to yellow-green lighting (shades of our arboreal ancestors? ;-0) If film's (the thing in the chain between scene and human eye) spectral sensitivity mimics our eye's response, then it's desirable that meters do the same. And that may or may not always be the case. So my answer would be the opposite: "a peak in the green region is considered [NOT to be] desirable" First of all, I think film should not mimic eyes spectral responce - if we want to replicate reality. Film should have 100% flat responce as we don't want to multiply the eye's responce curve - we want to apply it only once in the eye. We want to look the film/slide/picture as we looked at the scene. This leads to the same conclusion as you: meter should also not have any peaks but have the exact same responce as the film. But then again: this rarely affects our photographs in any significant way. Severi S. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Light Meter Spectral Response
Q.G. de Bakker wrote: So my answer would be the opposite: "a peak in the green region is considered [NOT to be] desirable" But digital sensors have twice has many green sites as red or blue (except foveon). So maybe there is an advantage ? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Light Meter Spectral Response
"Bob Monaghan" wrote in message
... sure, response curves vary a lot, a peak in the green region is considered desirable because the human eye responds strongly to yellow-green lighting (shades of our arboreal ancestors? ;-0) Uh, that's backwards. A meter that is oversensitive to green would give inflated readings, thus less exposure, thus dull results. Photographic light meters are supposed to accomdate the color sensitivities of the film. OTOH, light meters intended to evaluate light in terms of the human eye have different standards (check with the standards groups.) Now to the issue - while the human eye is, indeed, most 'sensitive' to light in the green/yellow boundary area (540nm) and interprets is as rather bright, we all know that most B&W images metered incidently make greens rather dull to our eyes; add to that the fact that some B&W films _are_ less sensitive to green and it seems highly unlikely that our photographic meters are calibrated to the human eye. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Light Meter Spectral Response
Roger I. McMillan wrote:
But digital sensors have twice has many green sites as red or blue (except foveon). So maybe there is an advantage ? Only perhaps if they change colours such that they look twice as green too. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Light Meter Spectral Response
"Q.G. de Bakker" wrote in message i.nl... Roger I. McMillan wrote: But digital sensors have twice has many green sites as red or blue (except foveon). So maybe there is an advantage ? Only perhaps if they change colours such that they look twice as green too. Us B&W people find the green channel to be the cleanest. Can someone explain that? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Light Meter Spectral Response
"Q.G. de Bakker" wrote in message ...
Looking at some randomly chosen film spectral response charts, i get the distinct impression that manufacturers aim to produce films that have a flat response curve. I am not sure if this is true. A flat response curve would mean that in case you take a photo of a colour spectrum image (with a range from violet to red) that you would see a neutral grey all over, and no differences between the grey scale values of colours. But it is pretty obvious that green and yellow appear brighter to the human eye than blue and red. In color metrology there is a more or less standard chart of human eye's response to colours. Film manufacturers try to imitate this 'curve' to get the same impression on film which the human eye sees. This was not easy since silver halogenides are sensitive in the blue range only, and light absorbing colorants had to be added to reach the goal of panchromatic (which means all-color) films. But still today most b/w films are more sensitive to blue - the blue sky usually shows much brighter on the film than it appears to the human eye. Selenium meters had a response curve which was rather close to the human eye curve. CdS meters are somewhat different. It's difficult to obtain the same curve with silicon photodiodes, that's why most manufactures use SBC cells (silicon blue filtered cells). They add a blue filter to dampen the red sensitivity and to increase the sensitivity in the blue and green range. However, the only reliable way to compare meters is to use a neutral grey card which eleminates any problems with color response. Winfried |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Light Meter Spectral Response
Winfried Buechsenschuetz wrote:
Looking at some randomly chosen film spectral response charts, i get the distinct impression that manufacturers aim to produce films that have a flat response curve. I am not sure if this is true. A flat response curve would mean that in case you take a photo of a colour spectrum image (with a range from violet to red) that you would see a neutral grey all over, and no differences between the grey scale values of colours. But it is pretty obvious that green and yellow appear brighter to the human eye than blue and red. True. That's why they have invented filters. Right? If a film is presented with an "equi-energy" spectrum, the correct respons would indeed be a "flat" image. In a typical real life scene, different colours in the subject filter out different amounts of light from the spectrum in which all wavelengths films are sensitive to are prresent in more or less equal amounts. That's how different grey tones in B&W photography are produced. Not by selective sensitivity. [...] However, the only reliable way to compare meters is to use a neutral grey card which eleminates any problems with color response. Not so. If a meter has a low sensitivity for any part of the spectrum, that pat wil not be present in the result it presents. And that reradless of whether light in that part of the spectrum was or was not present in the light int was measuring. Errors are then pre-programmed. Don't think that using a neutral grey card makes an difference. All it does is present a non-selectively reflecting surface (unlike coloured subjects, which by being selective in what they reflect produces diferent grey levels for different colours ;-)). |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Light meter suggestions | Alan | Digital Photography | 5 | June 29th 04 04:36 PM |
Do you only use manual metering? | Michael Scarpitti | 35mm Photo Equipment | 3 | June 24th 04 10:18 PM |
Using 35mm Camera as a Meter | Mike Jenkins | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 10 | June 13th 04 08:12 AM |
What light meter for Fuji GW670 11 ? | [email protected] | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 11 | April 28th 04 08:03 PM |
How do I use the light meter on an Autocord CDS III? | Stacey | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 7 | March 29th 04 06:23 PM |