If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon regresses in the low end, leaving one to wonder abouttheir situation
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon regresses in the low end, leaving one to wonder about their situation
In article , android
wrote: The other classic is to not allow people to bring umbrellas in... and for good reason. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon regresses in the low end, leaving one to wonder about theirsituation
On 8/22/2016 11:38 AM, nospam wrote:
In article , PeterN wrote: What sort of events, I doubt a slilent camera would be at great advantage at the Olympic or many sports arenas maybe in a library. Tennis, chess, snooker, concerts, churches, museums etc. tennis?? if you think tennis players can even hear a camera (or care if they could), you're crazy. wedding photographers have been using 'noisy slrs' in churches for decades. nobody gives a **** there either. museums don't care unless they ban all cameras, in which case a silent camera won't help. My guess is that you have never taken a serious interest in any of those sports. An unexpected sharp noise can cause a distraction. Not for everyone, but yes for some. as usual, you guess wrong. there are public tennis courts near where i live, just off a busy street where trucks frequently pass. a camera is the least of the distractions. 'noisy slrs' have been used at professional tennis tournaments for *years*. As usual, your statement does not refute my point. And unlike you, I did not say "all." And as for concerts, there is no question that shutter clicking is a definite distraction from the beauty of classical music. -- PeterN |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon regresses in the low end, leaving one to wonder about their situation
In article , PeterN
wrote: What sort of events, I doubt a slilent camera would be at great advantage at the Olympic or many sports arenas maybe in a library. Tennis, chess, snooker, concerts, churches, museums etc. tennis?? if you think tennis players can even hear a camera (or care if they could), you're crazy. wedding photographers have been using 'noisy slrs' in churches for decades. nobody gives a **** there either. museums don't care unless they ban all cameras, in which case a silent camera won't help. My guess is that you have never taken a serious interest in any of those sports. An unexpected sharp noise can cause a distraction. Not for everyone, but yes for some. as usual, you guess wrong. there are public tennis courts near where i live, just off a busy street where trucks frequently pass. a camera is the least of the distractions. 'noisy slrs' have been used at professional tennis tournaments for *years*. As usual, your statement does not refute my point. you didn't have a point. And unlike you, I did not say "all." translated: none. have you ever played tennis? tennis players aren't going to hear a shutter click, especially if it's a tournament with the crowd cheering. And as for concerts, there is no question that shutter clicking is a definite distraction from the beauty of classical music. you were talking about sports, not classical concerts. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon regresses in the low end, leaving one to wonder about theirsituation
On 23/08/2016 10:15, Whisky-dave wrote:
On Monday, 22 August 2016 17:02:46 UTC+1, David Taylor wrote: On 22/08/2016 15:42, Whisky-dave wrote: [] but it's not a mirroless camera and I don;t see it as a pro level camera either. I can't find any mirror in it! Enlighten me! a box brownie was a mirrorless camera too. As is the GX7, you were wrong. https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/pan...-lumix-dmc-gx7 -- Cheers, David Web: http://www.satsignal.eu |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon regresses in the low end, leaving one to wonder about their situation
In article ,
Whisky-dave wrote: I might venture to suggest than any camera can be a "pro" camera when it's in the hands of a "pro". Here's a low end mirroless camera that can be used by a pro. http://www.jessops.com/online.store/...5200/Show.html Maybe nospam can say why it's a 10 shot film camera, as I've no idea of it's attraction, unless you're obsessed with hello kitty. read the description: Includes 10 shots of Fujifilm Instant Colour Film |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon regresses in the low end, leaving one to wonder about their situation
On 2016-08-23 09:15:39 +0000, Whisky-dave said:
On Monday, 22 August 2016 17:02:46 UTC+1, David Taylor wrote: On 22/08/2016 15:42, Whisky-dave wrote: [] My GX7 offers an electronic shutter mode, but it's not a mirroless camera and I don;t see it as a pro level camera either. I can't find any mirror in it! Enlighten me! a box brownie was a mirrorless camera too. Actually it wasn't. In the simple "Brownie" viewfinder it had a mirror, and if you had one which gave you the option of a landscape or portrait orientation (The three eyed Brownie VF, VF, & lens), it had two. What it didn't have was a reflex(WYSIWYG), through the lens system which also required a mirror to make the incoming light from the lens make that turn into the prism and viewfinder. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon regresses in the low end, leaving one to wonder abouttheir situation
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 04:48:39 -0700, Savageduck
wrote in 2016082304483966310-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom: On 2016-08-23 09:15:39 +0000, Whisky-dave said: On Monday, 22 August 2016 17:02:46 UTC+1, David Taylor wrote: On 22/08/2016 15:42, Whisky-dave wrote: [] My GX7 offers an electronic shutter mode, but it's not a mirroless camera and I don;t see it as a pro level camera either. I can't find any mirror in it! Enlighten me! a box brownie was a mirrorless camera too. Actually it wasn't. In the simple "Brownie" viewfinder it had a mirror, and if you had one which gave you the option of a landscape or portrait orientation (The three eyed Brownie VF, VF, & lens), it had two. What it didn't have was a reflex(WYSIWYG), through the lens system which also required a mirror to make the incoming light from the lens make that turn into the prism and viewfinder. Totally true. it was a precursor to the Rolliflex! :-) -- teleportation kills |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon regresses in the low end, leaving one to wonder abouttheir situation
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 12:13:44 +0100, David Taylor
wrote in : On 23/08/2016 10:15, Whisky-dave wrote: On Monday, 22 August 2016 17:02:46 UTC+1, David Taylor wrote: On 22/08/2016 15:42, Whisky-dave wrote: [] but it's not a mirroless camera and I don;t see it as a pro level camera either. I can't find any mirror in it! Enlighten me! a box brownie was a mirrorless camera too. As is the GX7, you were wrong. https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/pan...-lumix-dmc-gx7 I can se the mirror two! Have a looksie: http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/panasonic-gx7/panasonic-gx7A.HTM It's got a blue tint, but what the... -- teleportation kills |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Difficult Photo Situation | Terry | Digital Photography | 15 | May 28th 06 04:08 AM |
The only situation where things look bad | RichA | Digital SLR Cameras | 7 | May 20th 05 03:58 PM |
Hypothetical situation | Roxy d'Urban | 35mm Photo Equipment | 17 | February 16th 05 04:10 PM |
Weird Film Scan Situation | [email protected] | 35mm Photo Equipment | 5 | June 30th 04 02:33 PM |
Weird Film Scan Situation | Jorge Prediguez | Digital Photography | 2 | June 30th 04 01:45 PM |