|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
October 20th 09, 10:54 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,alt.photography
|
|||
|
|||
Canon EOS-1D IV ( 1.3x crop, 16 Mpix, ISO to 102400)
Also sports 1/300 sync, WB bracketing (dear lord!)... 
|
|
#2
October 20th 09, 11:56 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,alt.photography
|
|||
|
|||
|
Canon EOS-1D IV ( 1.3x crop, 16 Mpix, ISO to 102400)
"Alan Browne" wrote: Also sports 1/300 sync, WB bracketing (dear lord!)... Cheap plastic body, no EVF. What a horrible camera. Sheesh. -- David J. Littleboy Tokyo, Japan
|
|
#3
October 21st 09, 07:32 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,alt.photography
|
|||
|
|||
|
Canon EOS-1D IV ( 1.3x crop, 16 Mpix, ISO to 102400)
David J. Littleboy wrote:
"Alan Browne" wrote: Also sports 1/300 sync, WB bracketing (dear lord!)... Cheap plastic body, no EVF. Sour grapes, and you even had to make **** up. -- Ray Fischer
|
|
#4
October 21st 09, 07:35 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,alt.photography
|
|||
|
|||
|
Canon EOS-1D IV ( 1.3x crop, 16 Mpix, ISO to 102400)
"Alan Browne" wrote in message ... Also sports 1/300 sync, WB bracketing (dear lord!)... Hey my D-SLR already has WB bracketing, 'bout time they caught up.
|
|
#5
October 21st 09, 07:36 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,alt.photography
|
|||
|
|||
|
Canon EOS-1D IV ( 1.3x crop, 16 Mpix, ISO to 102400)
"Larry Thong" wrote in message m... On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:54:49 -0400, Alan Browne wrote: Also sports 1/300 sync, WB bracketing (dear lord!)... Sounds impressive, but will the AF work? Sorry, you will have to wait for that.
|
|
#6
October 21st 09, 05:37 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,alt.photography
|
|||
|
|||
|
Canon EOS-1D IV ( 1.3x crop, 16 Mpix, ISO to 102400)
In article , Bob Larter
wrote: WB bracketing (dear lord!)... Talk about a pointless feature! white balance bracketing is nothing new. one of the first cameras that i recall having it was the nikon coolpix 995 nearly ten years ago. it can be useful when shooting jpeg, where altering white balance after the fact doesn't work that well. it's obviously not needed when shooting raw. I'm more interested in its extended ISO - up to ISO 102,400! agreed.
|
|
#7
October 21st 09, 05:45 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,alt.photography
|
|||
|
|||
|
Canon EOS-1D IV ( 1.3x crop, 16 Mpix, ISO to 102400)
Bob Larter wrote:
David J. Littleboy wrote: "Alan Browne" wrote: Also sports 1/300 sync, WB bracketing (dear lord!)... Cheap plastic body, no EVF. What a horrible camera. Sheesh. grin Yeah, and how many more will be whoosed.......? -- john mcwilliams
|
|
#8
October 21st 09, 05:49 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,alt.photography
|
|||
|
|||
|
Canon EOS-1D IV ( 1.3x crop, 16 Mpix, ISO to 102400)
Bob Larter wrote:
Alan Browne wrote: Also sports 1/300 sync, http://www.dpreview.com/news/0910/09102001canon1d4.asp WB bracketing (dear lord!)... Talk about a pointless feature! Yeah, just shoot RAW. I am guessing it takes one exposure and then converts it into several JPEGs with different color temps? Anyone know? [Academic interest only; I can't see using this] I'm more interested in its extended ISO - up to ISO 102,400! Sounds like it could capture a black hole! -- john mcwilliams
|
|
#9
October 21st 09, 06:06 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,alt.photography
|
|||
|
|||
|
Canon EOS-1D IV ( 1.3x crop, 16 Mpix, ISO to 102400)
On 2009-10-21 09:49:45 -0700, John McWilliams said:
Bob Larter wrote: Alan Browne wrote: Also sports 1/300 sync, http://www.dpreview.com/news/0910/09102001canon1d4.asp WB bracketing (dear lord!)... Talk about a pointless feature! Yeah, just shoot RAW. I am guessing it takes one exposure and then converts it into several JPEGs with different color temps? Anyone know? [Academic interest only; I can't see using this] I'm more interested in its extended ISO - up to ISO 102,400! Sounds like it could capture a black hole! Sucking up light like that it probably is a black hole. -- Regards, Savageduck
|
|
#10
October 21st 09, 06:08 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,alt.photography
|
|||
|
|||
|
Canon EOS-1D IV ( 1.3x crop, 16 Mpix, ISO to 102400)
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 09:49:45 -0700, John McWilliams
wrote: Bob Larter wrote: Alan Browne wrote: Also sports 1/300 sync, http://www.dpreview.com/news/0910/09102001canon1d4.asp WB bracketing (dear lord!)... Talk about a pointless feature! Yeah, just shoot RAW. I am guessing it takes one exposure and then converts it into several JPEGs with different color temps? Anyone know? [Academic interest only; I can't see using this] I'm more interested in its extended ISO - up to ISO 102,400! Sounds like it could capture a black hole! The desire for very high ISOs is the desire of a pure amateur. Pro's have gotten by just fine on ASA25 to ASA64 all their lives. Rarely will I find a need for ISO200. Even in fast-action sports settings or capturing birds on the wing. Nothing more than that is needed in the hands of someone with talent and expertise. Only base amateurs need high ISOs because they don't know how to use a camera properly in the first place. It's just one more setting they can add to their auto-everything Point and Shoot DSLR's arsenal of mediocrity so that the camera will hopefully compensate for their lack of skill and talent. That's all it is and will ever be.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 20 Mpix Canon vs film | Robert Feinman | 35mm Photo Equipment | 25 | August 29th 07 01:20 PM |
| Canon 40D... on a 1.3x crop sensor? | [email protected] | Digital SLR Cameras | 4 | September 9th 06 11:33 AM |
| Comparison of 16 Mpix MF back to Canon 1Ds M II | Bill Hilton | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 4 | November 21st 04 11:19 PM |
| Is 4 Mpix camera just as good as 5 Mpix when available light is the limiting factor? | Woody | Digital Photography | 17 | September 26th 04 06:44 PM |
Linear Mode
