Sometimes stupid loses

Bill Graham wrote:
PeterN wrote:
On 4/2/2011 10:34 PM, Bill Graham wrote:
PeterN wrote:
On 4/2/2011 9:39 PM, Bill Graham wrote:
PeterN wrote:
On 4/2/2011 6:01 PM, Ray Fischer wrote:
tony wrote:
"Bill
I spent over 40 years working and paying into a medical plan,
and supporting the medical profession and all its hangers on
with my efforts, and they treat me like a nobody, and don't
pay any attention to me at all. I should be in charge of all
of them!

God help us if you were in charge. You knew you had an
appointment, you knew you wanted the blood work results, you had
the ability to have the proper order, but you did nothing. And
you want to blame other people.

He's a Republican. NO personal responsibility. Just an irrational
belief that everybody should obey him.


Strange, accepting responsibility for one's acts is one of the
basic libertarian tenets. Indeed is is the left wing that is
short on the concept of accepting personal responsibility.

Ant that's the reply they give to my statement, "I spent over 40
years working and paying into a medical plan, and supporting
the medical profession and all its hangers on with my
efforts..." That we republicans/libertarians have no personal
responsibility. - I suggest that we have, at leaqst, an ability
to read and interpret English.


Acting responsibility isn't only about money. Indeed the concept is
more about recognition that I have the same rights as you and that
we must have a means of resolving the situation when my rights
conflict with yours. Under your theory I have a right to walk into
that same facility and order them not to treat you. Maybe you're right.
If we
eliminate all traffic lights, we will have fewer people to
overburden our medical system.

I think a free people should have the right to spend their money any
way they please. If they don't want to buy medical insurance, or
save for their retirement, then they shouldn't. But when they
retire, They will (or should) have to die, or work until they can't
and then die. If they get sick, they will have to either die, or
live in a poor, suffering state until they die. Just as I would had
I not saved and invested my money and purched medical insurance. It
is the business of you Socialists to steal my hard earned money and
give it to those who are the bums who didn't prepare for their
futures. But that isn't good enough for you, is it? You are annoyed
that I don't like it when you do this. You want me to say, "Oh, I
just love it when my government pays for the poor and uninsured with
my tax dollars. Now, I know that I shoulod have taken all my money
and spent it when I was young. I should have been driving a Porsche
instead of a VW, so it is my own stupidity that I am now having to
pay for someone else's retirement and health. Well, I'm sorry to
disappoint you. I am going to bitch about it until the day I die,
and vote against Socialism every chance aI get, too. You see, I have
this problem. I know that if no one had done what I did, there
wouldn't be any taxes to pay for those people who didn't save and
invest and insure themselves. So, I know that I am just the kind of
person that the whole damn system is depending on in order to
operate at all. And what makes me so damned mad is that you liberal
socialists can't understand that! You think that money grows on a
big tree in Washington DC.


And your statement has what? to do with your "right to get a blood
test without an order.

See? You still can't understand. Follow this carefully. I pay for the whole
medical profession with my taxes and health insurance payments. So they
should work for me. Why is that so hard for you stupid liberals to
understand?

Graham doesn't understand the concept that nobody needs to do business
with him. Like most selfish rightards he really has only an arrogant
belief that everybody must obey.

--
Ray Fischer | Mendacracy (n.) government by lying
| The new GOP ideal