A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital SLR Cameras
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Digital camera foiling technology



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 19th 05, 09:16 PM
RichA
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Digital camera foiling technology

Crave privacy? New tech knocks out digital cameras

By Michael Kanellos
http://news.com.com/Crave+privacy+Ne...cameras/2100-=
7337_3-5869832.html

Story last modified Mon Sep 19 04:00:00 PDT 2005



Researchers at the Georgia Institute of Technology have come up with an
inexpensive way to prevent digital cameras and digital video cameras
from capturing that secret shot.

The technology they've devised detects the presence of a digital camera
up to 33 feet away and can then shoot a targeted beam of light at the
lens, according to Shwetak Patel, a grad student at the university and
one of the lead researchers on the project.
click to view photos of prototype

That means that someone trying for a surreptitious snapshot of, say, a
product prototype or an amorous couple gets something altogether less
useful--a blurry picture (or a video) of what looks like a flashlight
beam, seen head on. (A video of how the system works can be viewed
here.)

The group has developed a lab prototype--which consists of a digital
projector with a modified video camera mounted on top--but will soon
design a device that could be manufactured and sold commercially. The
group, which presented a paper on its work at Ubicomp (The Seventh
International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing) in Tokyo last week,
is also in contact with large consumer electronics manufacturers.

Though photo-foiling gadgets are one possibility, the technology might
also eventually be incorporated into digital projectors and other
devices as a feature.

The Georgia Tech researchers aren't alone in their pursuit. Tech giant
Hewlett-Packard, for one, has applied for a patent on technology that
could remotely cause blurry pictures in digital cameras, but it
requires putting additional circuitry inside the camera. HP and others
are also working on projection technology meant to stymie video piracy.

The technology is a stab at ameliorating the privacy problems that have
arisen with the advent, quick ubiquity and tiny dimensions of digital
cameras. Nearly 85 percent of cell phones in Japan come with built-in
digital cameras, and the figure for North America and Western Europe is
supposed to rise to 80 percent by the end of next year, according to
market researcher Gartner.

"It certainly is a concern, and it has been a concern since cameras
have gotten really small," said Steve Baker, an analyst at NPD Group.
"It is a lab trick that has some real-world application."

Companies commonly confiscate digital cameras temporarily from visitors
coming to their labs or confidential meetings. "But you can't
confiscate a phone. Someone might be expecting an important call,"
Patel said.

Many companies also maintain strict no-photography policies in quasi
public places. Someone trying to take pictures inside a Wal-Mart or an
electronics boutique will immediately draw a warning, or expulsion.
Conferences also have similar rules. Patel himself got in trouble
trying to take a picture of a "No Photography" sign to illustrate where
theinvention could be used.

"If it is a big exhibit hall, it is impossible to confiscate all of the
cameras," said Patel.

How it works
The Georgia Tech system essentially exploits the "retroreflective"
property of digital camera lenses. When light strikes a retroreflective
surface, a portion of the light bounces back to the original source.
While eyeglasses, bottles, watches and other glass surfaces are
retroreflective, a coating on virtually all digital camera lenses puts
cameras in a class of their own.

"The film atop lenses (is) highly reflective," said Patel. "A lot of
people probably have known this but they haven't thought about
leveraging it."

In this system, a device bathes the region in front of it with infrared
light. When an intense retroreflection indicates the presence of a
digital camera lens, the device then fires a localized beam of light
directly at that point. Thus, the picture gets washed out.

The neutralizing light continues until the camera lens can no longer be
detected, which prevents video cameras from capturing clear footage.

For added security, the system emits light beams in a pattern that
prevents cameras from compensating for the light. (In the lab
prototype, the video camera, with its built-in infrared beam, serves as
the camera detector, while the projector is the neutralizer.)

The technology can detect and block multiple cameras and works on
cameras with either CCD or CMOS imagers, which are used in the vast
majority of digital cameras.

The neutralizing light is also highly focused to minimize distractions.
"We only light up pixels where the reflection is coming from," Patel
said.
This is your brain on tech
New twist on security warnings
Vista on write track for tablets
Intel's medical ambitions
Privacy tech blinds digital cameras
Previous Next

More work lies ahead for the researchers. The current implementation
works indoors and only up to certain distances--it's effective at a
range of up to 10 meters and covers a 45-degree area. Cameras close to
the detector and at a sharp angle can fall into an undetectable dead
zone. Fast shutter speeds might also present some challenges, as do
filters, though it turns out that the camera detector can spot lenses
cloaked with infrared filters.

While the prototype relies on a digital projector for the neutralizing
light source, the group believes it can also use a laser pointer and
two mirrors to foil photographers.

"That will make it a lot cheaper to do," Patel said.

The prototype is also rather indiscriminate--it knocks out whatever it
believes to be a camera. Some companies have released antiphotography
tools, but those tools work only if the camera or cell phone has a
Bluetooth chip--and then only if the gadgets are preprogrammed to shut
down when the chip receives a "no photographs" message.

So the broad nature of the Georgia Tech system is a good thing, Patel
said. "It doesn't require cooperation of the camera."


Copyright =A91995-2005 CNET Networks, Inc. All rights reserved.

  #2  
Old September 19th 05, 09:35 PM
Gormless
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"RichA" wrote in message
oups.com...

Thanks to our roving reporter.




  #3  
Old September 20th 05, 04:32 AM
Rich
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 19 Sep 2005 21:35:41 +0100, "Gormless"
wrote:


"RichA" wrote in message
roups.com...

Thanks to our roving reporter.




Don't like, don't read.
-Rich
  #4  
Old September 20th 05, 05:23 AM
Darrell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Rich" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 19 Sep 2005 21:35:41 +0100, "Gormless"
wrote:

Wow, somebody reinvented a flash slave!



  #5  
Old September 20th 05, 04:39 PM
Randall Ainsworth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Rich
wrote:

I know of guys in the biz who have set up a slave pointing backwards so
people couldn't steal their wedding setups. Or they've used a huge
umbrella fill and a shorter than normal lens for formals so that the
normal lens crowd would always get their equipment in the shot.
  #6  
Old September 20th 05, 05:49 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Rich scribbles:

Don't like, don't read.


No point, don't post.

  #7  
Old September 20th 05, 08:01 PM
David Littlewood
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article .com,
RichA writes
Crave privacy? New tech knocks out digital cameras

[Article snipped]

I'm sure that as soon as any such device goes into use, someone will
find a way to neutralise it. Thus the average person will be
inconvenienced, and the malefactor will get round it, just as with most
such repressive measures.

For example, from the description, a simple hand in the way of the
"neutralising beam" - or a french flag - could make it useless. Or a
different coating.

I'm also surprised by the "more reflective" coatings on the lenses.
Camera lenses are virtually always substantially less reflective than
ordinary glass. As for why "digital" lenses would be different, I cannot
imagine.

I also find it hard to see the other customers of the store using this
device being happy with constant searchlight beams going off all over
the place. I look forward to reading of the first law suit from someone
driven into an epileptic fit by it.

In fact, the more one thinks about this, the more it seems to be either
a hoax, or yet another pointless invention which fails to do what it
promises.

David

PS - at least they won't work with pinhole cameras :-)
--
David Littlewood
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to Buy a Digital Camera [email protected] Digital Photography 0 January 18th 05 04:39 PM
Digital zoom camera & lots of selection questions Lou Digital Photography 5 November 12th 04 01:43 AM
Which is better? digital cameras or older crappy cameras thatuse film? Michael Weinstein, M.D. In The Darkroom 13 January 24th 04 10:51 PM
FA: Canon PowerShot A10 Digital Camera excellent condition Jorielle Digital Photo Equipment For Sale 0 September 14th 03 10:54 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.