A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital SLR Cameras
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Apollo 11 Lunar landing - 40th aniversary



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 14th 09, 09:32 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,alt.photography,rec.photo.equipment.medium-format,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Alan Browne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12,640
Default Apollo 11 Lunar landing - 40th aniversary


Photos by (and of) their modified Hasselblad cameras.
Not immune to flare!

http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html...ml?ref=science
  #2  
Old July 15th 09, 03:25 AM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,alt.photography,rec.photo.equipment.medium-format,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Jeff R.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 769
Default Apollo 11 Lunar landing - 40th aniversary

Alan Browne wrote:
Photos by (and of) their modified Hasselblad cameras.
Not immune to flare!

http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html...ml?ref=science



Thanks for the link Alan.

I wish they'd made those (and many other) shots more widely accessible a
long time ago.

(Funny thing is, imagine how they'd be received by the experts in this
group - "lousy composition, poor focus, obviously amateur material..."
Hehehe)

Brought back lots of happy moments.

Remember how quickly the whole Apollo sequence was over? Like a shot! One
every couple of months, then nothing. Sigghhh.

I wonder of OHS would allow Apollo moon shots nowadays.

--
Jeff R.
(lost somewhat in reverie)

  #3  
Old July 15th 09, 03:54 AM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,alt.photography,rec.photo.equipment.medium-format,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
J. Clarke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,690
Default Apollo 11 Lunar landing - 40th aniversary

Jeff R. wrote:
Alan Browne wrote:
Photos by (and of) their modified Hasselblad cameras.
Not immune to flare!

http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html...ml?ref=science



Thanks for the link Alan.

I wish they'd made those (and many other) shots more widely
accessible a
long time ago.


FWIW, the mission reports and imagery are available for each of the Apollo
missions from Amazon, and have been for years--the images are on CD. The
one for Apollo 11 is at
http://www.amazon.com/Apollo-11-Miss...626364&sr=1-11

  #4  
Old July 15th 09, 04:08 AM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,alt.photography,rec.photo.equipment.medium-format,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Jeff R.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 769
Default Apollo 11 Lunar landing - 40th aniversary

J. Clarke wrote:
Jeff R. wrote:
Alan Browne wrote:
Photos by (and of) their modified Hasselblad cameras.
Not immune to flare!

http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html...ml?ref=science



Thanks for the link Alan.

I wish they'd made those (and many other) shots more widely
accessible a
long time ago.


FWIW, the mission reports and imagery are available for each of the
Apollo missions from Amazon, and have been for years--the images are
on CD. The one for Apollo 11 is at
http://www.amazon.com/Apollo-11-Miss...626364&sr=1-11


Thanks.
Now to go and blow my monthly download limit....

--
Jeff R.

  #5  
Old July 15th 09, 04:53 AM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,alt.photography,rec.photo.equipment.medium-format,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Bill Graham
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,294
Default Apollo 11 Lunar landing - 40th aniversary


"Jeff R." wrote in message
...
Alan Browne wrote:
Photos by (and of) their modified Hasselblad cameras.
Not immune to flare!

http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html...ml?ref=science



Thanks for the link Alan.

I wish they'd made those (and many other) shots more widely accessible a
long time ago.

(Funny thing is, imagine how they'd be received by the experts in this
group - "lousy composition, poor focus, obviously amateur material..."
Hehehe)


Yes. - Too bad they couldn't have sent Ansel Adams to the moon.......

  #6  
Old July 15th 09, 05:37 AM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,alt.photography,rec.photo.equipment.medium-format,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Bill Graham
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,294
Default Apollo 11 Lunar landing - 40th aniversary


"Bill Graham" wrote in message
...
Yes. - Too bad they couldn't have sent Ansel Adams to the moon.......


He would have come back with no pictures at all, and when they asked him
what happened, he would have said, "The light wasn't quite right."

  #7  
Old July 15th 09, 05:46 AM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,alt.photography,rec.photo.equipment.medium-format,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Jeff R.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 769
Default Apollo 11 Lunar landing - 40th aniversary

Bill Graham wrote:
"Bill Graham" wrote in message
...
Yes. - Too bad they couldn't have sent Ansel Adams to the moon.......


He would have come back with no pictures at all, and when they asked
him what happened, he would have said, "The light wasn't quite right."


or:

"I was waiting for moonrise"


  #8  
Old July 15th 09, 11:50 AM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,alt.photography,rec.photo.equipment.medium-format,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Walter Banks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 803
Default Apollo 11 Lunar landing - 40th aniversary

The real reason was Ansel's camera was as big as the LEM and Ansel insisted
that he wanted to bring his camera back.

w..

"Jeff R." wrote:

Bill Graham wrote:
..
Yes. - Too bad they couldn't have sent Ansel Adams to the moon.......


He would have come back with no pictures at all, and when they asked
him what happened, he would have said, "The light wasn't quite right."


or:

"I was waiting for moonrise"


  #9  
Old July 15th 09, 12:38 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,alt.photography,rec.photo.equipment.medium-format,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
J. Clarke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,690
Default Apollo 11 Lunar landing - 40th aniversary

Walter Banks wrote:
The real reason was Ansel's camera was as big as the LEM and Ansel
insisted that he wanted to bring his camera back.


Been interesting if Ansel had consulted though and they'd come up with a
super lightweight 8x10 camera for the purpose.

w..

"Jeff R." wrote:

Bill Graham wrote:
..
Yes. - Too bad they couldn't have sent Ansel Adams to the
moon.......

He would have come back with no pictures at all, and when they asked
him what happened, he would have said, "The light wasn't quite
right."


or:

"I was waiting for moonrise"


  #10  
Old July 15th 09, 01:45 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,alt.photography,rec.photo.equipment.medium-format,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
OG
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 106
Default Apollo 11 Lunar landing - 40th aniversary


"Bill Graham" wrote in message
...

"Bill Graham" wrote in message
...
Yes. - Too bad they couldn't have sent Ansel Adams to the moon.......


He would have come back with no pictures at all, and when they asked him
what happened, he would have said, "The light wasn't quite right."


Just couldn't get the atmosphere


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FA: Vintage NASA Apollo First Lunar Landing 12 Photo Lot Set fishnet General Equipment For Sale 0 April 13th 08 10:07 PM
What film was used for Apollo missions? Neil Gould In The Darkroom 5 August 31st 07 10:58 PM
FA: No BidsNINE (9) NOS APOLLO DYP PROJECTOR BULBS$126 worth cooltube 35mm Equipment for Sale 0 November 22nd 05 10:21 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.