If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Fuji resurrects the 2/3" sensor
RichA wrote:
Could be interesting. But the camera is larger than the NEX series. http://dpreview.com/news/1109/11090102fujifilmx10.asp Looks very interesting indeed, especially their method of getting higher dynamic range which seems unique to me. And I sure like the idea of having manual zoom. Now if only it's not too pricey . . . |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Fuji resurrects the 2/3" sensor
On 9/3/2011 12:34 PM, Neil Harrington wrote:
RichA wrote: Could be interesting. But the camera is larger than the NEX series. http://dpreview.com/news/1109/11090102fujifilmx10.asp Looks very interesting indeed, especially their method of getting higher dynamic range which seems unique to me. And I sure like the idea of having manual zoom. Now if only it's not too pricey . . . I prefer a manual zoom. -- Peter |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Fuji resurrects the 2/3" sensor
PeterN wrote in
: On 9/3/2011 12:34 PM, Neil Harrington wrote: RichA wrote: Could be interesting. But the camera is larger than the NEX series. http://dpreview.com/news/1109/11090102fujifilmx10.asp Looks very interesting indeed, especially their method of getting higher dynamic range which seems unique to me. And I sure like the idea of having manual zoom. Now if only it's not too pricey . . . I prefer a manual zoom. And you probably preferred manual focusing when AF was just introduced. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Fuji resurrects the 2/3" sensor
On Sat, 03 Sep 2011 23:38:13 -0500, Rich wrote:
PeterN wrote in : On 9/3/2011 12:34 PM, Neil Harrington wrote: RichA wrote: Could be interesting. But the camera is larger than the NEX series. http://dpreview.com/news/1109/11090102fujifilmx10.asp Looks very interesting indeed, especially their method of getting higher dynamic range which seems unique to me. And I sure like the idea of having manual zoom. Now if only it's not too pricey . . . I prefer a manual zoom. And you probably preferred manual focusing when AF was just introduced. I prefer a manual zoom too. Regards, Eric Stevens |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Fuji resurrects the 2/3" sensor
Eric Stevens wrote:
On Sat, 03 Sep 2011 23:38:13 -0500, Rich wrote: PeterN wrote in : On 9/3/2011 12:34 PM, Neil Harrington wrote: RichA wrote: Could be interesting. But the camera is larger than the NEX series. http://dpreview.com/news/1109/11090102fujifilmx10.asp Looks very interesting indeed, especially their method of getting higher dynamic range which seems unique to me. And I sure like the idea of having manual zoom. Now if only it's not too pricey . . . I prefer a manual zoom. And you probably preferred manual focusing when AF was just introduced. I prefer a manual zoom too. You do understand the camera being discussed *has* a manual zoom, right? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Fuji resurrects the 2/3" sensor
On 9/4/2011 12:38 AM, Rich wrote:
wrote in : On 9/3/2011 12:34 PM, Neil Harrington wrote: RichA wrote: Could be interesting. But the camera is larger than the NEX series. http://dpreview.com/news/1109/11090102fujifilmx10.asp Looks very interesting indeed, especially their method of getting higher dynamic range which seems unique to me. And I sure like the idea of having manual zoom. Now if only it's not too pricey . . . I prefer a manual zoom. And you probably preferred manual focusing when AF was just introduced. It so happens that my zoom lenses are all manual. I still use my Coolpix since I converted in to IR and prefer a manual zoom. I use autofocus for wildlife, but for my macro work and landscape work prefer manual focus for exact control. Exactly what is wrong with that. -- Peter Autofocus is a tool to be used when appropriate. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Fuji resurrects the 2/3" sensor
On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 09:38:37 -0400, "Neil Harrington"
wrote: Eric Stevens wrote: On Sat, 03 Sep 2011 23:38:13 -0500, Rich wrote: PeterN wrote in : On 9/3/2011 12:34 PM, Neil Harrington wrote: RichA wrote: Could be interesting. But the camera is larger than the NEX series. http://dpreview.com/news/1109/11090102fujifilmx10.asp Looks very interesting indeed, especially their method of getting higher dynamic range which seems unique to me. And I sure like the idea of having manual zoom. Now if only it's not too pricey . . . I prefer a manual zoom. And you probably preferred manual focusing when AF was just introduced. I prefer a manual zoom too. You do understand the camera being discussed *has* a manual zoom, right? Certainly. What makes you think I don't? I was voicing my agreement with someone else's preference: not implying a criticism. Regards, Eric Stevens |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Fuji resurrects the 2/3" sensor
Eric Stevens wrote:
On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 09:38:37 -0400, "Neil Harrington" wrote: Eric Stevens wrote: On Sat, 03 Sep 2011 23:38:13 -0500, Rich wrote: PeterN wrote in : On 9/3/2011 12:34 PM, Neil Harrington wrote: RichA wrote: Could be interesting. But the camera is larger than the NEX series. http://dpreview.com/news/1109/11090102fujifilmx10.asp Looks very interesting indeed, especially their method of getting higher dynamic range which seems unique to me. And I sure like the idea of having manual zoom. Now if only it's not too pricey . . . I prefer a manual zoom. And you probably preferred manual focusing when AF was just introduced. I prefer a manual zoom too. You do understand the camera being discussed *has* a manual zoom, right? Certainly. What makes you think I don't? I was voicing my agreement with someone else's preference: not implying a criticism. OK. The previous comment or two led me to wonder if that was understood. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fuji resurrects the 2/3" sensor | Savageduck[_3_] | Digital Photography | 6 | September 5th 11 03:09 PM |