If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
how to deal with "delay time" when photographing
Hello,
There is surely a term for what I want to discuss. But since I'm no expert, I don't know that term. "the length of time between my pushing the button, and the camera taking the picture." Sometimes I want to take a picture of something that is fleeting: an expression on someone's face, for example. Let's assume that I've already done some things right: * the camera is in position * it's focused already * red-eye reduction is OFF So, I push the button, and . . . . uh . . . hmmm . . . . it takes the photo. Sure enough, the moment has come and gone, before the picture was taken. What can I do about that? At the moment, I have a Canon PowerShot 530. That might not impress the professionals, but that's not my goal. I'm not going to spend $1000 on a camera. Good ideas? Thank you! Ted Shoemaker |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
how to deal with "delay time" when photographing
wrote in message oups.com... Hello, There is surely a term for what I want to discuss. But since I'm no expert, I don't know that term. "the length of time between my pushing the button, and the camera taking the picture." Sometimes I want to take a picture of something that is fleeting: an expression on someone's face, for example. Let's assume that I've already done some things right: * the camera is in position * it's focused already * red-eye reduction is OFF So, I push the button, and . . . . uh . . . hmmm . . . . it takes the photo. Sure enough, the moment has come and gone, before the picture was taken. What can I do about that? At the moment, I have a Canon PowerShot 530. That might not impress the professionals, but that's not my goal. I'm not going to spend $1000 on a camera. Good ideas? Thank you! Ted Shoemaker Hello: I would try: Turn off AF. Most cameras will refocus anyway so having it focused correctly accomplishes nothing. Turn off AE. Most cameras take a long time to determine the "correct" exposure in dim light. Some will never decide on the exposure. Now see how long the delay time is. Jim |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
how to deal with "delay time" when photographing
Jim's got some good suggestions... the only other option I might
suggest, if you don't want to shell out for a DSLR, is to get a really cheap fixed-focus film camera. The problem you're describing is known as "shutter lag" and it's more-or-less inherent to almost all auto-focus point-and-shoot cameras, film or digital. Jim wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Hello, There is surely a term for what I want to discuss. But since I'm no expert, I don't know that term. "the length of time between my pushing the button, and the camera taking the picture." Sometimes I want to take a picture of something that is fleeting: an expression on someone's face, for example. Let's assume that I've already done some things right: * the camera is in position * it's focused already * red-eye reduction is OFF So, I push the button, and . . . . uh . . . hmmm . . . . it takes the photo. Sure enough, the moment has come and gone, before the picture was taken. What can I do about that? At the moment, I have a Canon PowerShot 530. That might not impress the professionals, but that's not my goal. I'm not going to spend $1000 on a camera. Good ideas? Thank you! Ted Shoemaker Hello: I would try: Turn off AF. Most cameras will refocus anyway so having it focused correctly accomplishes nothing. Turn off AE. Most cameras take a long time to determine the "correct" exposure in dim light. Some will never decide on the exposure. Now see how long the delay time is. Jim |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
how to deal with "delay time" when photographing
"Matt Ion" wrote in message news:2g6ti.30706$fJ5.465@pd7urf1no... Jim's got some good suggestions... the only other option I might suggest, if you don't want to shell out for a DSLR, is to get a really cheap fixed-focus film camera. The problem you're describing is known as "shutter lag" and it's more-or-less inherent to almost all auto-focus point-and-shoot cameras, film or digital. Jim wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Hello, There is surely a term for what I want to discuss. But since I'm no expert, I don't know that term. "the length of time between my pushing the button, and the camera taking the picture." Sometimes I want to take a picture of something that is fleeting: an expression on someone's face, for example. Let's assume that I've already done some things right: * the camera is in position * it's focused already * red-eye reduction is OFF So, I push the button, and . . . . uh . . . hmmm . . . . it takes the photo. Sure enough, the moment has come and gone, before the picture was taken. What can I do about that? At the moment, I have a Canon PowerShot 530. That might not impress the professionals, but that's not my goal. I'm not going to spend $1000 on a camera. Good ideas? Thank you! Ted Shoemaker Hello: I would try: Turn off AF. Most cameras will refocus anyway so having it focused correctly accomplishes nothing. Turn off AE. Most cameras take a long time to determine the "correct" exposure in dim light. Some will never decide on the exposure. Now see how long the delay time is. Jim Probably the only way to get around this problem is to "pre focus", anticipate and hold the shutter button in the half press position, should be minimal delay when you then do the full press.. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
how to deal with "delay time" when photographing
Pete D wrote:
"Matt Ion" wrote in message news:2g6ti.30706$fJ5.465@pd7urf1no... Jim's got some good suggestions... the only other option I might suggest, if you don't want to shell out for a DSLR, is to get a really cheap fixed-focus film camera. The problem you're describing is known as "shutter lag" and it's more-or-less inherent to almost all auto-focus point-and-shoot cameras, film or digital. Jim wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Hello, There is surely a term for what I want to discuss. But since I'm no expert, I don't know that term. "the length of time between my pushing the button, and the camera taking the picture." Sometimes I want to take a picture of something that is fleeting: an expression on someone's face, for example. Let's assume that I've already done some things right: * the camera is in position * it's focused already * red-eye reduction is OFF So, I push the button, and . . . . uh . . . hmmm . . . . it takes the photo. Sure enough, the moment has come and gone, before the picture was taken. What can I do about that? At the moment, I have a Canon PowerShot 530. That might not impress the professionals, but that's not my goal. I'm not going to spend $1000 on a camera. Good ideas? Thank you! Ted Shoemaker Hello: I would try: Turn off AF. Most cameras will refocus anyway so having it focused correctly accomplishes nothing. Turn off AE. Most cameras take a long time to determine the "correct" exposure in dim light. Some will never decide on the exposure. Now see how long the delay time is. Jim Probably the only way to get around this problem is to "pre focus", anticipate and hold the shutter button in the half press position, should be minimal delay when you then do the full press.. That's the best you can do. I got the impression from the op that he was focusing then releasing the shutter. That won't do, you have to keep the shutter half depressed. I always do this even when the subject is stationary. Dave Cohen |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
how to deal with "delay time" when photographing
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
how to deal with "delay time" when photographing
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
how to deal with "delay time" when photographing
snip
"the length of time between my pushing the button, and the camera taking the picture." snip Ted, this is called "shutter lag" and it's the bane of photographers everywhere. It exists in all cameras, but is minimized to nearly (perceptably) zero in the best cameras. Newer cameras tend to minimize shutter lag, and it's often written about in reviews. You can fiddle around with settings till the cows come home, but the best approach to reducing shutter lag is to buy a camera without noticeable shutter lag. In the under $300 range, the Canon S3 IS is one I own and enjoy. In addition to very little shutter lag, it has a great zoom. You can go to a baseball game, sit in the upper deck and catch the batter as he hits the ball. Go to your local photo shop and try the S3 (if it's available) or some other cameras and see what you think of their shutter lag. I think you'll find the newer models of any kind but the cheapest have, in large measure, fixed this problem. HTH, Ray |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
how to deal with "delay time" when photographing
Thanks, all, for the good advice.
Ted Shoemaker |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Oly 5050 Z internal "battery" no longer holds date and time | Frank H | Digital Photography | 2 | May 7th 07 05:51 PM |
How to insert the "modified time" attribute in "date taken" attrib in batch mode | ashjas | Digital Photography | 4 | November 8th 06 09:00 PM |
Is X-Sync speed a "big deal" anymore - now that we have High-speed synch on powerful flash units? | C J Southern | Digital SLR Cameras | 39 | December 29th 05 03:24 PM |
6 Cellphone images in Time Magazine's "Best Photos of the Year" | Ron Hunter | Digital Photography | 0 | December 20th 05 09:24 AM |
6 Cellphone images in Time Magazine's "Best Photos of the Year" | timeOday | Digital Photography | 0 | December 16th 05 07:03 PM |