A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

My D80 & D90 gallery has moved



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 22nd 09, 08:25 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Jay Kneese
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default My D80 & D90 gallery has moved

Just finished checking out your site and it was a real treat. Also read the
"experiments" on metering and noise properties of the D80 and D90 with
interest. I'd like to pass along a few thoughts you might be interested in.

I got my first adjustable camera, an old folding Kodak, in the late 1940s. I
had never heard of an exposure meter, but each roll of film contained a data
sheet with a chart of exposures for various lighting conditions. I followed
the charts and got good pictures. When I got my first job in 1950 (minimum
wage at 65 cents an hour) I bought a used Argus 35mm camera and my first
roll of Kodachrome (ASA 10). Somewhere along the line Kodak had put out a
cardboard dial-type exposure guide which became my "Bible". Using this
guide, which was literally the "sunny 16" rule, I shot hundreds of slides
with very few bad expoosures. Several years later after I had acquired a
real exposure meter it was obvious that it was still basicly indicating the
sunny 16 exposure rule.

Now jump ahead to today and your findings concerning the sunny 16 rule as it
applies to the D80 and D90. My current camera is a D90 - my fifth digital
camera. In all these cameras I've noticed essentially what you showed in
your experiments - that it's closer to the "sunny 11" rule. I think the
answer is what several instruction manuals and other writings have said,
that the ISO sensitivity of the digital camera is "approximately" the same
as ISO (or ASA) film speed.

One other thing I find interesting. It seems to require a certain amount of
skill and interpretation to get a correctly metered exposure with the DSLR
cameras. My last camera before the D90 was a CoolPix 8800 and before that a
CP 5700. I used matrix metering exclusively on both these cameras and got
what I'd call correct exposures better than 90% of the time. One would think
the metering on the Ds would be better, not worse, than a P & S!

For what it's worth, in looking at your noise comparison page I noticed the
D90 exposures appear to be consistently about 1/3 EV lighter than the D80.
If I'm seeing correctly that might have a bearing on the metering comparison
tests. Just wondering.

At any rate, keep up the good work. After reading your results I feel the
need to go out and play with my D90 some more. I'm not totally happy with
what I'm getting.

"eNo" wrote in message
...
New URL is http://esfotoclix.com. Come check it out.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
anyone moved photos from ofoto [email protected] Digital Photography 0 October 9th 06 04:07 AM
Cambridge Camera has moved to Brooklyn! Don Wiss Digital Photography 4 January 28th 05 05:13 PM
Kodak press release site has moved Michael A. Covington In The Darkroom 0 October 13th 04 03:03 AM
Moved to eBay Frank Malloway Digital Photo Equipment For Sale 0 July 14th 03 01:31 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.