If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 05:12:31 GMT, John
wrote: Please I ask only those who have a college degree in a field relevent to this question or professional photographers answer. Sorry I have to be so strict, but I need advice from people who know what they are talking about. But if you know what your talking about and do not have a degree go ahead and answer, but cite your sources, thanks... Question Will a home photo printer produce the same long term results as the 1 hour photo lab? When I mean long term, I mean a photo lasting a number of years without fade. My family purchased a cute little photo printer to go with our Sony digital camera that is 5-6MP MP I believe. The pictures look just as good as a 35mm, but I wonder if they will last 5-10 years. On the other hand I can go to a photo lab and insert a Memory Stick, pro, SD, mini SD, XD, San Disk, CD/DVD, CF, or a floppy disk into one of the machines an receive goodprints within the hour. Dont tell me that the little photo printing machine that we have is as quality as the 1 hour photo labs. Because they both look the same, there has to be a huge price difference between the home machine and the professional machines. I've attempted to persuade my family not to completely dump their 35mm cameras and the idea of biringing their camera into a photo lab to have the pictures printed, but they do not listen. I personally own a Vivitar camera that uses SD cards and the 1 hour lab produces good results. But their photo machine only takes memory stick, bummer!! Thanks, John The durability, quality, and cost of home photo printer prints vis-a-vis prints produced commercially has been extensively discussed here. This information is readily available through Google. I could answer your question, of course, as can any of the "regulars" here. Unfortunately none of the educational institutions I attended offered a curriculum in "Home Photo Printing." Cheers, Leonard |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 05:12:31 GMT, John
wrote: Please I ask only those who have a college degree in a field relevent to this question or professional photographers answer. Sorry I have to be so strict, but I need advice from people who know what they are talking about. But if you know what your talking about and do not have a degree go ahead and answer, but cite your sources, thanks... Question Will a home photo printer produce the same long term results as the 1 hour photo lab? When I mean long term, I mean a photo lasting a number of years without fade. My family purchased a cute little photo printer to go with our Sony digital camera that is 5-6MP MP I believe. The pictures look just as good as a 35mm, but I wonder if they will last 5-10 years. On the other hand I can go to a photo lab and insert a Memory Stick, pro, SD, mini SD, XD, San Disk, CD/DVD, CF, or a floppy disk into one of the machines an receive goodprints within the hour. Dont tell me that the little photo printing machine that we have is as quality as the 1 hour photo labs. Because they both look the same, there has to be a huge price difference between the home machine and the professional machines. I've attempted to persuade my family not to completely dump their 35mm cameras and the idea of biringing their camera into a photo lab to have the pictures printed, but they do not listen. I personally own a Vivitar camera that uses SD cards and the 1 hour lab produces good results. But their photo machine only takes memory stick, bummer!! Thanks, John The durability, quality, and cost of home photo printer prints vis-a-vis prints produced commercially has been extensively discussed here. This information is readily available through Google. I could answer your question, of course, as can any of the "regulars" here. Unfortunately none of the educational institutions I attended offered a curriculum in "Home Photo Printing." Cheers, Leonard |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"John" wrote in message news:1103778751.21a76ff06dd924f861a91fa012be5ac4@t eranews... Please I ask only those who have a college degree in a field relevent to this question or professional photographers answer. Sorry I have to be so strict, but I need advice from people who know what they are talking about. But if you know what your talking about and do not have a degree go ahead and answer, but cite your sources, thanks... As you clearly wont trust any answer that doesn't come from someone who has a BSc in inkjets or a BA in 1 hour photolabs you will no doubt be keen to see evidence that has been rigerously tested scientifically, so here is what I suggest you do. Take a photograph, print it out on your inkjet, have the same photo printed out at a number of photolabs (as not all are the same quality). Place them in a nice sunny window - return to them in 10 years time and see which one came out best |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
I could be wrong about this, but I suspect that most photo kiosks use
dye-sub printers, I'm not a hardware man but I have worked on photo kiosk software - which means I've seen the insides of one. The printer had a wide belt which was a bit like an old fashioned printer ribbon. I seem to recall it was a transparent plastic material which carried some sort of colour coating which got transferred to the picture. The ribbon was a consumable in that it got used up in the printing process. Perhaps someone can confirm what type of printer technology this rather unscientific description indicates. I don't have a clue. Keith |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
I could be wrong about this, but I suspect that most photo kiosks use
dye-sub printers, I'm not a hardware man but I have worked on photo kiosk software - which means I've seen the insides of one. The printer had a wide belt which was a bit like an old fashioned printer ribbon. I seem to recall it was a transparent plastic material which carried some sort of colour coating which got transferred to the picture. The ribbon was a consumable in that it got used up in the printing process. Perhaps someone can confirm what type of printer technology this rather unscientific description indicates. I don't have a clue. Keith |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"John" Please I ask only those who have a college degree in a field relevent to this question or professional photographers answer. Sorry I have to be so strict, but I need advice from people who know what they are talking about. But if you know what your talking about and do not have a degree go ahead and answer, but cite your sources, thanks... Have you ever considered taking a course in public relations? Some people need to be taught the basics. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
"John" Please I ask only those who have a college degree in a field relevent to this question or professional photographers answer. Sorry I have to be so strict, but I need advice from people who know what they are talking about. But if you know what your talking about and do not have a degree go ahead and answer, but cite your sources, thanks... Have you ever considered taking a course in public relations? Some people need to be taught the basics. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
I don't meet your criteria, so I am not allowed to answer your questions.
That's a real shame because I know quite a bit about the subjects you wish to discuss and have quite a list of good information sources saved in my Favorites list. I also own a number of good books by qualified people and could probably pass along some quite useful info. Sorry, but I don't meet your requirements. KB "John" wrote in message news:1103778751.21a76ff06dd924f861a91fa012be5ac4@t eranews... Please I ask only those who have a college degree in a field relevent to this question or professional photographers answer. Sorry I have to be so strict, but I need advice from people who know what they are talking about. But if you know what your talking about and do not have a degree go ahead and answer, but cite your sources, thanks... Question Will a home photo printer produce the same long term results as the 1 hour photo lab? When I mean long term, I mean a photo lasting a number of years without fade. My family purchased a cute little photo printer to go with our Sony digital camera that is 5-6MP MP I believe. The pictures look just as good as a 35mm, but I wonder if they will last 5-10 years. On the other hand I can go to a photo lab and insert a Memory Stick, pro, SD, mini SD, XD, San Disk, CD/DVD, CF, or a floppy disk into one of the machines an receive goodprints within the hour. Dont tell me that the little photo printing machine that we have is as quality as the 1 hour photo labs. Because they both look the same, there has to be a huge price difference between the home machine and the professional machines. I've attempted to persuade my family not to completely dump their 35mm cameras and the idea of biringing their camera into a photo lab to have the pictures printed, but they do not listen. I personally own a Vivitar camera that uses SD cards and the 1 hour lab produces good results. But their photo machine only takes memory stick, bummer!! Thanks, John |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
"John"
Please I ask only those who have a college degree in a field relevent to this question or professional photographers answer Well, I guess Gates and Dell can't answer your question and neither can I even though I have worked with inkjet printers and digital cameras since 1998. Good luck with your answers. By the way, what degree do you have? Rosita |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
In article 1103778751.21a76ff06dd924f861a91fa012be5ac4@teran ews, John
wrote: Please I ask only those who have a college degree in a field relevent to this question or professional photographers answer. Sorry I have to be so strict, but I need advice from people who know what they are talking about. But if you know what your talking about and do not have a degree go ahead and answer, but cite your sources, thanks... Hah Hah Hah Hah Hah Hah! gasp for breath, sigh Thanks, I needed that. First time in a LONG time I've heard from someone who thinks a degree is relevant to current, practical knowledge. Isn't that cute... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Capacity and display clarity of IPod Photo | Mac's Photo Ipod | Digital Photography | 2 | January 4th 05 10:55 PM |
need someadvice on photo printers (4x6) | howard | Digital Photography | 0 | December 15th 04 01:46 AM |
Photo Printers 4x6 | kahout | Digital Photography | 13 | December 12th 04 10:04 PM |
substituting lighting changes for software edit | David Virgil Hobbs | Digital Photography | 2 | November 18th 04 06:31 PM |
Photo hosting and sales question | Prowler99 | Digital Photography | 7 | November 17th 04 09:37 AM |