If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
You can with a Nikon, not with a Canon ;-))
I guess that you haven't heard of fp or high speed sync?
Would be interesting to know the hit rate using your method. My guess is that it's not too reliable. "Sosumi" wrote in message ... Hack the flash so you synch at 1/4000 !!! I did it with the D40. Normal synch is already good at 1/500, but I want the camera to do what I want, not what he wants. So yesterday I got my new SB 800 flash, very nice and fantastic features, like max. distance of over 50 meters! Everything automatic, even the zoom up to 105 mm works together with the lens and if the camera goes standby or you turn it of, so does the flash. I had just finished the book (125 pages) and tried everything out. OK it works as a slave and everything you can want in a flash: it has got it! But I stay bothered by the max flash synch at 1/500. Why the heck is that? I remember when I had the D80, it flashed at any speed I choose, with the internal flash. So I found something on the net: tape all contacts of the camera or flash with paper or tape, except the middle one. Thatīs all. The camera thinks it has no flash and all automatic stuff is gone, but the flash DOES fire!! So I was able to FREEZE falling water from the tap in the kitchen. Very cool!! You just have to play with the aperture and the amount of flash a little. But itīs digital, so you can fool around as much as necesary. I did read most Canon cameraīs canīt do this trick. Except maybe the older ones or more/most expensive. But lemme know if itīs not true! Also: show some pictures with what you can freeze here. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
You can with a Nikon, not with a Canon ;-))
My D80 HAD FP, but the problem is, the D40 doesnīt. Donīt understand hit
rate. I get good pictures, if thatīs what youīre worried about... "Gino" wrote in message ... I guess that you haven't heard of fp or high speed sync? Would be interesting to know the hit rate using your method. My guess is that it's not too reliable. "Sosumi" wrote in message ... Hack the flash so you synch at 1/4000 !!! I did it with the D40. Normal synch is already good at 1/500, but I want the camera to do what I want, not what he wants. So yesterday I got my new SB 800 flash, very nice and fantastic features, like max. distance of over 50 meters! Everything automatic, even the zoom up to 105 mm works together with the lens and if the camera goes standby or you turn it of, so does the flash. I had just finished the book (125 pages) and tried everything out. OK it works as a slave and everything you can want in a flash: it has got it! But I stay bothered by the max flash synch at 1/500. Why the heck is that? I remember when I had the D80, it flashed at any speed I choose, with the internal flash. So I found something on the net: tape all contacts of the camera or flash with paper or tape, except the middle one. Thatīs all. The camera thinks it has no flash and all automatic stuff is gone, but the flash DOES fire!! So I was able to FREEZE falling water from the tap in the kitchen. Very cool!! You just have to play with the aperture and the amount of flash a little. But itīs digital, so you can fool around as much as necesary. I did read most Canon cameraīs canīt do this trick. Except maybe the older ones or more/most expensive. But lemme know if itīs not true! Also: show some pictures with what you can freeze here. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
You can with a Nikon, not with a Canon ;-))
In article ,
says... My D80 HAD FP, but the problem is, the D40 doesn?t. Don?t understand hit rate. I get good pictures, if that?s what you?re worried about... 100 good out of 100 ? 50 good out of 100 ? 20 good out of 100 ? Hit rate.. Anyway, Supporting what Wayne said elsewhere. http://www.evil-photographer.com/water.jpg Very quick & dirty test.. Canon 350D. 1 sec at F8 in darkness. Canon 580EX. T. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
You can with a Nikon, not with a Canon ;-))
Sosumi wrote:
"Matt Ion" wrote in message news:WlUFi.160024$fJ5.5622@pd7urf1no... Sosumi wrote: So I found something on the net: tape all contacts of the camera or flash with paper or tape, except the middle one. Any camera with hotshoe will do that with any hotshoe flash. Thatīs all. The camera thinks it has no flash and all automatic stuff is gone, but the flash DOES fire!! No ****, Sherlock! Check out any non-dedicated generic flash and any older camera that doesn't support dedicated flash - ALL they use is the center contact! Wow! So I was able to FREEZE falling water from the tap in the kitchen. Very cool!! Neat, you've just re-discovered one of the first things ever done with the invention of the camera flash. You just have to play with the aperture and the amount of flash a little. Pick up a cheap non-dedicated flash... they have this little chart on the back that tells you what aperture to use at what distance for any given ISO speed. Wow, you're right on top of things with this radical new technique! I did read most Canon cameraīs canīt do this trick. You read wrong. Just shot this with my 300D and 420EX flash. No contacts taped up, flash set to high-speed sync, camera set to 1/4000, f/11, ISO200. http://www2.moltenimage.com/photos/1-4000_flash.jpg Unsharp, outta focus and too dark. What else, genius? You didn't ask for focus or exposure, you asked for flash sync at 1/4000s. Any other comments, idiot? You quote and read wrong: I wrote "except for the older ones" What do you call a 300D? New model? Practically a dinosaur. Try it with a "modern" Canon like the D400. A four-year-old camera is "a dinosaur"? Wow... then what would my 1956-vintage Argus C-3 be? The 400D (not D400) is the younger brother to the 300D. Seeing as it's essentially a newer version of the same camera, and can use the same 420EX flash, how would it be any different in this regard? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
You can with a Nikon, not with a Canon ;-))
it's not the camera does the trick but the flash. any flash with very short
duration including your SB 800 could do the trick working with a canon camera or any camera. of course you need the understanding of how to trigger the flash on. "Sosumi" wrote in message ... Hack the flash so you synch at 1/4000 !!! I did it with the D40. Normal synch is already good at 1/500, but I want the camera to do what I want, not what he wants. So yesterday I got my new SB 800 flash, very nice and fantastic features, like max. distance of over 50 meters! Everything automatic, even the zoom up to 105 mm works together with the lens and if the camera goes standby or you turn it of, so does the flash. I had just finished the book (125 pages) and tried everything out. OK it works as a slave and everything you can want in a flash: it has got it! But I stay bothered by the max flash synch at 1/500. Why the heck is that? I remember when I had the D80, it flashed at any speed I choose, with the internal flash. So I found something on the net: tape all contacts of the camera or flash with paper or tape, except the middle one. Thatīs all. The camera thinks it has no flash and all automatic stuff is gone, but the flash DOES fire!! So I was able to FREEZE falling water from the tap in the kitchen. Very cool!! You just have to play with the aperture and the amount of flash a little. But itīs digital, so you can fool around as much as necesary. I did read most Canon cameraīs canīt do this trick. Except maybe the older ones or more/most expensive. But lemme know if itīs not true! Also: show some pictures with what you can freeze here. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
You can with a Nikon, not with a Canon ;-))
Matt Ion wrote:
Sosumi wrote: "Matt Ion" wrote in message news:WlUFi.160024$fJ5.5622@pd7urf1no... Sosumi wrote: So I found something on the net: tape all contacts of the camera or flash with paper or tape, except the middle one. Any camera with hotshoe will do that with any hotshoe flash. Thatīs all. The camera thinks it has no flash and all automatic stuff is gone, but the flash DOES fire!! No ****, Sherlock! Check out any non-dedicated generic flash and any older camera that doesn't support dedicated flash - ALL they use is the center contact! Wow! So I was able to FREEZE falling water from the tap in the kitchen. Very cool!! Neat, you've just re-discovered one of the first things ever done with the invention of the camera flash. You just have to play with the aperture and the amount of flash a little. Pick up a cheap non-dedicated flash... they have this little chart on the back that tells you what aperture to use at what distance for any given ISO speed. Wow, you're right on top of things with this radical new technique! I did read most Canon cameraīs canīt do this trick. You read wrong. Just shot this with my 300D and 420EX flash. No contacts taped up, flash set to high-speed sync, camera set to 1/4000, f/11, ISO200. http://www2.moltenimage.com/photos/1-4000_flash.jpg Unsharp, outta focus and too dark. What else, genius? You didn't ask for focus or exposure, you asked for flash sync at 1/4000s. Any other comments, idiot? You quote and read wrong: I wrote "except for the older ones" What do you call a 300D? New model? Practically a dinosaur. Try it with a "modern" Canon like the D400. A four-year-old camera is "a dinosaur"? Wow... then what would my 1956-vintage Argus C-3 be? The 400D (not D400) is the younger brother to the 300D. Seeing as it's essentially a newer version of the same camera, and can use the same 420EX flash, how would it be any different in this regard? Vous parlez de quoi ? je ne voudrais pas déranger. -- -- Ricco |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
You can with a Nikon, not with a Canon ;-)) But tell it inFrench please
To all our Australian friends: please note that fr.rec.photo is a
French-speaking newsgroup. Please either discard its address from your adress list or translate all the above discussions into the French language, as you may choose. ;-) Thank You and kind regards. Ghost Rider |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
You can with a Nikon, not with a Canon ;-))
I think itīs a great idea! Thanks, Iīm going to try it! "Wayne" wrote in message ... In article , says... Thatīs all. The camera thinks it has no flash and all automatic stuff is gone, but the flash DOES fire!! So I was able to FREEZE falling water from the tap in the kitchen. Very cool!! The obvious question is why would you want to set the shutter speed to 1/4000 second for this? A totally unnecessary complication. Flash exposure is only about aperture and flash power. NOT about shutter speed. You only want the shutter to be open for flash. The only time you would care about exact shutter speed is for ambient lighting, if somehow mixed in the same frame (like outdoors in daylight - then matching the two exposures is necessary). At any one given aperture and ISO, then shutter speed controls ambient exposure, and flash power controls flash exposure. This is simply how things work. With regard to freezing your falling water, try this: Set lens aperture to maybe f/16 (for depth, am assuming up close) Set shutter speed to Bulb, where it stays open as long as you hold the button down (a couple of seconds). Set ISO 200. Set SB-800 flash to Manual, at lowest 1/128 power level (for fastest speed), at perhaps 8 inches (20 cm) from water subject (assuming flash zoom setting is at 24mm). Vary this ballpark distance in or out, as needed for proper exposure. Open shutter (hold button down in Bulb) Start the water drop moving, or whatever. Fire SB-800 flash in manual from maybe 8 inches (for water drops) (assuming it is timed to be at the right instant desired as subject). Then we are done, so close shutter by letting go of shutter button to shut it. Shutter was open maybe 1 or 2 seconds (shutter speed), but the water drop is perfectly frozen by the flash speed.. Which duration is 1/41,400 second for Nikon SB-800 at 1/128 power. The 1/41,400 second flash is much faster than the 1/4000 second shutter, and the shutter has no effect at all (so long as it was open). Even when the shutter speed was two seconds, it still has no effect at all (in this case). The 1/41,4000 second flash duration stops the motion. Not the shutter. Indoors in a halfway dim room, the ambient will not register in a couple of seconds. Theoretically, you might choose to use a tremendously slow flash unit with a fast enough shutter speed to matter, but why would you possibly want to? See http://www.scantips.com/speed.html about why speed lights are called speed lights, and regarding stopping motion with flash. -- Wayne http://www.scantips.com "A few scanning tips" |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
You can with a Nikon, not with a Canon ;-)) But tell it in French please
"Ghost-Rider" a écrit dans le message de news: ... To all our Australian friends: please note that fr.rec.photo is a French-speaking newsgroup. Please either discard its address from your adress list or translate all the above discussions into the French language, as you may choose. ;-) C'est fou comme l'anglais ressemble ā du spam ! -- Jérôme |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
TESTS; Nikon D80, Canon Rebel XTi, Sony A100, Canon 30D | RichA | Digital SLR Cameras | 2 | October 14th 06 02:53 AM |
Images; Sony A100 ver Nikon D80 ver Canon Rebel XTi ver Canon 30D | Rich | Digital Photography | 0 | October 13th 06 07:45 PM |
comparison photos - Canon 20D, Nikon D70s, Canon 1DMkII, Nikon D2X with FILM | gnnyman | Digital Photo Equipment For Sale | 0 | July 5th 05 12:09 AM |
Canon Elph SD110, Kodak EasyShare CX7430, Canon Powershots A75 and A80, and Nikon CoolPix 3200 | Shannon | Digital Photography | 8 | August 19th 04 10:03 PM |
nikon vs canon | Quostat | Digital Photography | 21 | August 3rd 04 01:28 PM |