If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Digital cameras capture water (on image) poorly?
Stephen H. Westin wrote:
Nah, you're thinking of the SuperCCD SR, which the S2 doesn't have. "SuperCCD" basically means that the sensors are positioned in a different array configuration to get more resolution in certain cases. Only the SR, as in the Fuji S3, has dual photodiodes to allow recording at two different sensitivities. Thanks for the correction. Actually, it all looks murky. If you stretch contrast, it blows out the highlights, but no more so than with film... Most print film actually can record a huge amount of highlight detail, though it's usually only visible with a scanner, not in prints. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Digital cameras capture water (on image) poorly?
Most print film actually can record a huge amount of highlight detail,
though it's usually only visible with a scanner, not in prints. Very true, but there are some low contrast papers that take advantage of the wide range. Some of the Agfa papers come out really well. Bob Hickey www.pbase.com/bobhickey/galleries |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
digital cameras and flash = poor image quality?? | michaelb | Digital Photography | 25 | July 3rd 04 08:35 AM |
Will digital photography ever stabilize? | Alfred Molon | Digital Photography | 37 | June 30th 04 08:11 PM |
First digital camera - opinions wanted. | Wilbur | Digital Photography | 6 | June 25th 04 02:04 PM |
Which is better? digital cameras or older crappy cameras thatuse film? | Michael Weinstein, M.D. | In The Darkroom | 13 | January 24th 04 09:51 PM |