If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Another MF scanner question!! Nikon 8000 vs. 9000 and B&W film
Jos. Burke wrote:
[...] Are the Nikon scanners capable of scanning B&W film--I seem to remember reading either here or elsewhere that the 8000 can not!1 Is this true? They, of course, can indeed scan all types of film, including B&W. Some very thick emulsion films are a bit too much for the automatic dust removal feature. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Another MF scanner question!! Nikon 8000 vs. 9000 and B&W film
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Another MF scanner question!! Nikon 8000 vs. 9000 and B&W film
Alrighty---I'll post another MF scanner question. I have an Epson 2450, so
lets let even compare the Nikon 8000/9000 to the Epson 2450 thru current 4870 version. Please! The 2450 is okay BUT it's no Nikon film scanner!! Are the Nikon scanners capable of scanning B&W film--I seem to remember reading either here or elsewhere that the 8000 can not!1 Is this true? If not then can the 9000. I'm interested in the approx $1300 (currently) Nikon 8000 BUT I have and shoot quite a bit of B&W 120 film. Not sure if the addition $700 for the 9000 model is a worthwhile step -up for me! J Burke |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Another MF scanner question!! Nikon 8000 vs. 9000 and B&W film
"Jos. Burke" wrote in message ... Alrighty---I'll post another MF scanner question. I have an Epson 2450, so lets let even compare the Nikon 8000/9000 to the Epson 2450 thru current 4870 version. Please! The 2450 is okay BUT it's no Nikon film scanner!! Are the Nikon scanners capable of scanning B&W film--I seem to remember reading either here or elsewhere that the 8000 can not!1 Is this true? If not then can the 9000. I'm interested in the approx $1300 (currently) Nikon 8000 BUT I have and shoot quite a bit of B&W 120 film. Not sure if the addition $700 for the 9000 model is a worthwhile step -up for me! Of course it can do B&W. B&W is color without hue. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Another MF scanner question!! Nikon 8000 vs. 9000 and B&W film
jjs wrote:
Of course it can do B&W. B&W is color without hue. And with metallic silver instead of dyes. ;-) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Another MF scanner question!! Nikon 8000 vs. 9000 and B&W film
Both scanners can *scan* black and white film just fine. What neither
scanner can do is to utilize the ICE scratch/defect removal function on traditional (silver based) black and white film. The ICE function will work on the newer C41 style black and white as well as color emulsions. The 9000's ICE Pro is supposed to also work on Kodachrome (the 8000's ICE was not rated for Kodachrome although some people report that it actually works well enough in their opinion). Doug -- Doug's "MF Film Holder" for batch scanning "strips" of 120/220 medium format film: http://home.earthlink.net/~dougfishe...mainintro.html |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Another MF scanner question!! Nikon 8000 vs. 9000 and B&W film
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004 12:44:02 -0500, "Jos. Burke"
wrote: Alrighty---I'll post another MF scanner question. I have an Epson 2450, so lets let even compare the Nikon 8000/9000 to the Epson 2450 thru current 4870 version. Please! The 2450 is okay BUT it's no Nikon film scanner!! Are the Nikon scanners capable of scanning B&W film--I seem to remember reading either here or elsewhere that the 8000 can not!1 Is this true? If not then can the 9000. I'm interested in the approx $1300 (currently) Nikon 8000 BUT I have and shoot quite a bit of B&W 120 film. Not sure if the addition $700 for the 9000 model is a worthwhile step -up for me! J Burke Either one will scan BW just fine. You just can't use ICE with silver-based BW films. You can use ICE with chromogenic BW films. Kodachrome w/ICE is no good on the 8000, and supposedly works better on th 9000. rafe b. http://www.terrapinphoto.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon 8000 and Mac OS X 10.3 Compatability.
From: "Jos. Burke"
The 8000 seems a great choice but I also use the current Mac 10.3 OS. Any known compatability problems from users here!! Thanks and I really appreciate the insight from all posters. http://www.nikontechusa.com/ ... a valuable source of drivers and updates ... just skimming it (I don't use a Mac) I see this blurb on the FAQ from May ...."Nikon has confirmed compatibility with Nikon Scan 4.0.1 under Mac OS 10.3." So you'll probably have to update the driver software if you're buying used. Bill |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon 8000 and Mac OS X 10.3 Compatability.
Well,
The 8000 seems a great choice but I also use the current Mac 10.3 OS. Any known compatability problems from users here!! Thanks and I really appreciate the insight from all posters. J Burke |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon 8000 and Mac OS X 10.3 Compatability.
In article , Bill Hilton
wrote: From: "Jos. Burke" The 8000 seems a great choice but I also use the current Mac 10.3 OS. Any known compatability problems from users here!! Thanks and I really appreciate the insight from all posters. http://www.nikontechusa.com/ ... a valuable source of drivers and updates ... just skimming it (I don't use a Mac) I see this blurb on the FAQ from May ..."Nikon has confirmed compatibility with Nikon Scan 4.0.1 under Mac OS 10.3." So you'll probably have to update the driver software if you're buying used. Bill Should you not be pleased with the Nikon software you might go to hamrick and download Vuescan. I've used their software with both my old agfa flatbed scanner and my new nikon film scanner. First rate! billfrogg |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|