If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Sharpening program
Can someone recommend a good stand-alone sharpening program as it
seems like most are plug-ins for some other program? Also, when assembling a panorama, is it better to sharpen each shot individually or just do the completed pano? Or does it even matter? Neil |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Sharpening program
On Sat, 03 Nov 2007 15:14:27 -0600, NeilH wrote:
Can someone recommend a good stand-alone sharpening program as it seems like most are plug-ins for some other program? ImageMagick |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Sharpening program
On Sat, 03 Nov 2007 15:14:27 -0600, NeilH wrote:
Can someone recommend a good stand-alone sharpening program as it seems like most are plug-ins for some other program? Also, when assembling a panorama, is it better to sharpen each shot individually or just do the completed pano? Or does it even matter? Neil CleanerZoomer http://www.cleanerzoomer.com/ It's an excellent stand-alone application with some very nice sharpening, noise-removal methods, JPEG artifacts cleaner, and an upsampling utility. Another good one is Focus Magic http://www.focusmagic.com It comes as a stand-alone and plugin version both in the same package. The stand-alone is nice but there's more adjustment options available in the plugin. As for panoramas: Most of the time panoramas are assembled from the non-tweaked photos. So that all color balance, exposure, and contrast levels are retained as accurately as possible from frame to frame, ensuring the most invisible seams. After the panorama is assembled then you would do your final tweaking on the image as a whole. Saving sharpening for last. If you don't plan on doing any exposure and color tweaking to your final panorama then you can sharpen each frame before assembly. Keeping in mind that you may have to re-sharpen again. Applying sharpening safely a second time if you are using Focus Magic (which doesn't create sharpening halo artifacts like unsharp-mask methods do). If your panorama stitcher isn't using Lanczos resampling algorithms when it performs its lens-distortion and image leveling corrections then it will blur fine details during the stitching process. This is the biggest problem that anyone runs into when using any version of PhotoShop for panorama or HDR assembly. This blurring from non-Lanczos resampling methods may require one final Focus Magic sharpening to correct it. Having said all that, and not knowing your level of experience nor expertise with various programs and their methods and how they can work together, it's probably best if you just apply sharpening for the very last step on the final panorama. Unless you are completely aware of how your panorama software and sharpening software is doing its thing then you may end up introducing artifacts, or get less image quality than you started out with by not saving sharpening for last. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Sharpening program
NeilH wrote:
Can someone recommend a good stand-alone sharpening program as it seems like most are plug-ins for some other program? Also, when assembling a panorama, is it better to sharpen each shot individually or just do the completed pano? Or does it even matter? Neil Fast Stone Image Viewer(FSViewer). Best of all, it's free. I sharpen each, then sharpen the completed pano if it needs it. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Sharpening program
"John Ferguson" wrote in message . .. NeilH wrote: Can someone recommend a good stand-alone sharpening program as it seems like most are plug-ins for some other program? Also, when assembling a panorama, is it better to sharpen each shot individually or just do the completed pano? Or does it even matter? Neil Fast Stone Image Viewer(FSViewer). Best of all, it's free. I sharpen each, then sharpen the completed pano if it needs it. Thanks for that tip, this program shows my Fujifilm .RAF raw images perfectly, very surprising. The xnview proggy can't do that, and it's more than a twice sized download, too. Very well ordered programming. AAvK |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Sharpening program
On Sat, 03 Nov 2007 15:14:27 -0600, NeilH wrote:
Can someone recommend a good stand-alone sharpening program as it seems like most are plug-ins for some other program? Also, when assembling a panorama, is it better to sharpen each shot individually or just do the completed pano? Or does it even matter? Neil Thanks for all the great ideas, guys. I was using a program (pixaround) which has sharpening in it and it appears to improve details in some Canyonland photos recently taken. But I would like to try some other pano programs that may need a sharpening tweek. Being a novice at this type of thing, I greatly appreciate the expertise and help that this group provides. Neil Hoover |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Sharpening program
On 3 Nov 2007 23:15:06 GMT in rec.photo.digital, Allodoxaphobia
wrote, On Sat, 03 Nov 2007 15:14:27 -0600, NeilH wrote: Can someone recommend a good stand-alone sharpening program as it seems like most are plug-ins for some other program? ImageMagick What parameters do you like for sharpening with ImageMagick? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Sharpening program
NeilH wrote:
Can someone recommend a good stand-alone sharpening program as it seems like most are plug-ins for some other program? Also, when assembling a panorama, is it better to sharpen each shot individually or just do the completed pano? Or does it even matter? Stitch then sharpen - otherwise you're asking for "issues" at the picture boundaries. BugBear |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Sharpening program
Allodoxaphobia wrote:
On Sat, 03 Nov 2007 15:14:27 -0600, NeilH wrote: Can someone recommend a good stand-alone sharpening program as it seems like most are plug-ins for some other program? ImageMagick Allodoxaphobia (Fear of Opinions), do you have a recommendation for sharpening parameters in ImageMagick? Here's what I use: convert -filter Lanczos -resize 25% -unsharp 1x3+1+.1 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
ImageMagick Was: Sharpening program
On 5 Nov 2007 10:35:20 -0800, Bill Tuthill wrote:
Allodoxaphobia wrote: On Sat, 03 Nov 2007 15:14:27 -0600, NeilH wrote: Can someone recommend a good stand-alone sharpening program as it seems like most are plug-ins for some other program? ImageMagick Allodoxaphobia (Fear of Opinions), do you have a recommendation for sharpening parameters in ImageMagick? Here's what I use: convert -filter Lanczos -resize 25% -unsharp 1x3+1+.1 I have no recommendations for any one-parameter-list-fits-all. I did use your example on an underwater JPEG and the results looked quite nice. Then I used it on a mountain pass web cam image and it was over sharpened. It's always been fiddle, futz, and accept what's Good Enough for me. Jonesy -- Marvin L Jones | jonz | W3DHJ | linux 38.24N 104.55W | @ config.com | Jonesy | OS/2 *** Killfiling google posts: http://jonz.net/ng.htm |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sharpening | Ockham's Razor | Digital Photography | 11 | February 6th 07 08:35 PM |
Sharpening In Photoshop | Joe | Digital Photography | 4 | August 14th 06 03:18 AM |
Am I over-sharpening? | Walter Dnes (delete the 'z' to get my real address | Digital Photography | 12 | February 9th 06 06:58 AM |
RAW sharpening | embee | Digital Photography | 11 | December 24th 04 03:43 PM |
D70 on-camera sharpening vs. Photoshop sharpening | john | Digital Photography | 7 | July 23rd 04 10:55 AM |