Two D90 questions

Pete D wrote:

Sounds like you didn't read the OP, he hasn't recieved it in the mail yet.


I have recieved it now, but there was no manual . . . :-(. Waiting for a
reply from the photo store.

rgds,
ole k

Anyway, it seems like Ken Rockwell will publish his D90 manual online any
day now.
/per

"ole kvaal" wrote
...

- And also, is it true that there is no manual in the box? In case, where
do I find one? (I've checked Nikon.com but couldn't find any.)

Thanks in advance,
Ole K

per wrote:
Anyway, it seems like Ken Rockwell will publish his D90 manual online any
day now.


Thanks. Anyone got any idea, who's the better: Ken Rockwell or Thom Hogan?

rgds,
ole k

ole kvaal wrote:
per wrote:
Anyway, it seems like Ken Rockwell will publish his D90 manual online
any day now.


Thanks. Anyone got any idea, who's the better: Ken Rockwell or Thom Hogan?

rgds,
ole k
I'm a Hogan fan, myself.

"ole kvaal" wrote
...

per wrote:
Anyway, it seems like Ken Rockwell will publish his D90 manual online any
day now.

Thanks. Anyone got any idea, who's the better: Ken Rockwell or Thom Hogan?

rgds,
ole k


I prefer Hogan, by far.
MUCH more objective than ken.

You can download the D90 Manual from Nikon. I did yesterday.



"G Paleologopoulos" wrote in message
news:1222364466.105012@athprx03...
"ole kvaal" wrote
...

per wrote:
Anyway, it seems like Ken Rockwell will publish his D90 manual online any
day now.

Thanks. Anyone got any idea, who's the better: Ken Rockwell or Thom Hogan?

rgds,
ole k


I prefer Hogan, by far.
MUCH more objective than ken.

In article , ole kvaal
wrote:

Thanks. Anyone got any idea, who's the better: Ken Rockwell or Thom Hogan?

ken rockwell states his site is a work of fiction. thom hogan does
not. thom has vastly more expertise with regards to nikon. ken just
likes to shoot his mouth off and get web clicks. a lot of what ken
says is deliberately incorrect (by his own admission).

Ole Kvaal wrote:

nospam wrote:
In article , ole kvaal
wrote:

Thanks. Anyone got any idea, who's the better: Ken Rockwell or
Thom Hogan?

ken rockwell states his site is a work of fiction. thom hogan
does not. thom has vastly more expertise with regards to
nikon. ken just likes to shoot his mouth off and get web
clicks. a lot of what ken says is deliberately incorrect (by
his own admission).

Thanks to those who supported this view. I got his D70/70s on cd
and had it printed. I've been keeping coming back to it and
reading more, as my own experience made me understand what he
was saying, little by little. I'm sure I'll buy his work on D90
as well. According to his web site, he is already writing it.

Hogan? He hasn't even done a D60, yet, as far as I can tell.

--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org
Blinky: http://blinkynet.net

Alan Browne wrote:
Maurice Blanchard wrote:

return that crap and buy a Canon instead

Please show us your high quality Canon images...

He'll only point you to the Canon website. :-

-Wolfgang

"ole kvaal" wrote:
Thanks. Anyone got any idea, who's the better: Ken Rockwell or Thom Hogan?

rgds,
ole k

Ken has his D90 manual out now, and it is free.
Thom can certainly not beat that!
http://kenrockwell.com/nikon/d90/users-guide/index.htm
Otherwise I find it quite useless to state who is better. They cover partly
different aspects, no one has an answer to every question, and no person is
ever 100% correct.
/per