If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
My review of Casio Exilim EX-S500
I bought this camera on Amazon.com and submitted a review to that site.
I would characterize this camera as a bit of a project: I am currently experimenting with its settings, and trying to find ways to improve its image quality. So any comments from other EX-S500 users will be welcome! This is the review I wrote: Here is the good news: the Exilim is very compact and nicely made. I like the way it can be programmed to remember all (that I could find) of its many settings. This is really important: it means that you can whip out the camera and begin shooting immediately, with your preferred settings. The delay for autofocus/autoexposure is among the best of the tiny cameras. The flash is reasonably strong for such a tiny camera. You can choose how the camera focuses: automatic, manual, macro/automatic, pan, and infinity. There are many clever features, such as the capability to remove the "keystone effect" distortion when photographing a business card or other rectangular document. The user interface is excellent, and this is important in a product that offers so many features and options. Another advantage of the Exilim is that Casio sells some pretty good cases for this camera. I chose to buy an especially form-fitting case from Semson; I don't think that Amazon.com carries it. For a camera this small, you really want to carry it with you all of the time. A small but protective case is an advantage. Oddly enough, many competing cameras cannot be matched with one. Now here is the bad news, and there is no getting around it. The picture quality borders on "bad." I compared pictures from the Exilim with my old Canon SD10, which is similar in size. The Canon gave me much sharper images, better colors, and more detail. The fuzziness of the Exilim pictures was quite striking when I photographed some book covers. The letters printed on the books were razor sharp in the Canon images, but not so in the Exilim images. Since the Canon has less resolution than the Exilim, I postprocessed the Exilim pictures to reduce the resolution to that of the Canon (5 Mpixel - 4 Mpixel). The Canon images still looked sharper. The Exilim produces skin colors that are often quite unattractive. I have been experimenting with postprocessing software; this is promising. The autofocus will fail if pointed at a dark colored object, or a flat object that is at an angle to the camera. In such cases, you can use the pan focus setting though. My experience here is with the autofocus area set to "spot." It can also be set to "multi," but I haven't experimented with this yet. The macro capability of the Exilim is not great. You cannot get very close to your subject, even at the wide angle zoom setting. Switching to manual focus and crossing your fingers might help, I am still experimenting with this. The flash sometimes washes out detail in pictures due to excessive power. This occurs very frequently in close-up shots. This problem can be addressed by reducing the flash intensity, but this is an extra chore for the photographer; it is not automatic. Amazon.com shows that the Canon SD30 will be available October 10. My advice is to wait for that model to appear before committing to the Exilim. In fact, if you want to save some money, the Canon SD20 might be for you. If it is like the SD10, it will be slower than the Exilim, and it will have a weaker flash. It will also lack optical zoom. But you will get solidly better pictures with the Canon. That should count for something! -- David Arnstein | | |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"David Arnstein" wrote in message ... I bought this camera on Amazon.com and submitted a review to that site. I would characterize this camera as a bit of a project: I am currently experimenting with its settings, and trying to find ways to improve its image quality. So any comments from other EX-S500 users will be welcome! This is the review I wrote: Here is the good news: the Exilim is very compact and nicely made. I like the way it can be programmed to remember all (that I could find) of its many settings. This is really important: it means that you can whip out the camera and begin shooting immediately, with your preferred settings. The delay for autofocus/autoexposure is among the best of the tiny cameras. The flash is reasonably strong for such a tiny camera. You can choose how the camera focuses: automatic, manual, macro/automatic, pan, and infinity. There are many clever features, such as the capability to remove the "keystone effect" distortion when photographing a business card or other rectangular document. The user interface is excellent, and this is important in a product that offers so many features and options. Another advantage of the Exilim is that Casio sells some pretty good cases for this camera. I chose to buy an especially form-fitting case from Semson; I don't think that Amazon.com carries it. For a camera this small, you really want to carry it with you all of the time. A small but protective case is an advantage. Oddly enough, many competing cameras cannot be matched with one. Now here is the bad news, and there is no getting around it. The picture quality borders on "bad." I compared pictures from the Exilim with my old Canon SD10, which is similar in size. The Canon gave me much sharper images, better colors, and more detail. The fuzziness of the Exilim pictures was quite striking when I photographed some book covers. The letters printed on the books were razor sharp in the Canon images, but not so in the Exilim images. Since the Canon has less resolution than the Exilim, I postprocessed the Exilim pictures to reduce the resolution to that of the Canon (5 Mpixel - 4 Mpixel). The Canon images still looked sharper. The Exilim produces skin colors that are often quite unattractive. I have been experimenting with postprocessing software; this is promising. The autofocus will fail if pointed at a dark colored object, or a flat object that is at an angle to the camera. In such cases, you can use the pan focus setting though. My experience here is with the autofocus area set to "spot." It can also be set to "multi," but I haven't experimented with this yet. The macro capability of the Exilim is not great. You cannot get very close to your subject, even at the wide angle zoom setting. Switching to manual focus and crossing your fingers might help, I am still experimenting with this. The flash sometimes washes out detail in pictures due to excessive power. This occurs very frequently in close-up shots. This problem can be addressed by reducing the flash intensity, but this is an extra chore for the photographer; it is not automatic. Amazon.com shows that the Canon SD30 will be available October 10. My advice is to wait for that model to appear before committing to the Exilim. In fact, if you want to save some money, the Canon SD20 might be for you. If it is like the SD10, it will be slower than the Exilim, and it will have a weaker flash. It will also lack optical zoom. But you will get solidly better pictures with the Canon. That should count for something! -- David Arnstein | | Gosh, you're wonderful. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
My review of Casio Exilim EX-S500
"David Arnstein" wrote in message
... I bought this camera on Amazon.com and submitted a review to that site. I would characterize this camera as a bit of a project: I am currently experimenting with its settings, and trying to find ways to improve its image quality. So any comments from other EX-S500 users will be welcome! This is the review I wrote: Here is the good news: the Exilim is very compact and nicely made. I like the way it can be programmed to remember all (that I could find) of its many settings. This is really important: it means that you can whip out the camera and begin shooting immediately, with your preferred settings. The delay for autofocus/autoexposure is among the best of the tiny cameras. The flash is reasonably strong for such a tiny camera. You can choose how the camera focuses: automatic, manual, macro/automatic, pan, and infinity. There are many clever features, such as the capability to remove the "keystone effect" distortion when photographing a business card or other rectangular document. The user interface is excellent, and this is important in a product that offers so many features and options. Another advantage of the Exilim is that Casio sells some pretty good cases for this camera. I chose to buy an especially form-fitting case from Semson; I don't think that Amazon.com carries it. For a camera this small, you really want to carry it with you all of the time. A small but protective case is an advantage. Oddly enough, many competing cameras cannot be matched with one. Now here is the bad news, and there is no getting around it. The picture quality borders on "bad." I compared pictures from the Exilim with my old Canon SD10, which is similar in size. The Canon gave me much sharper images, better colors, and more detail. The fuzziness of the Exilim pictures was quite striking when I photographed some book covers. The letters printed on the books were razor sharp in the Canon images, but not so in the Exilim images. Since the Canon has less resolution than the Exilim, I postprocessed the Exilim pictures to reduce the resolution to that of the Canon (5 Mpixel - 4 Mpixel). The Canon images still looked sharper. The Exilim produces skin colors that are often quite unattractive. I have been experimenting with postprocessing software; this is promising. The autofocus will fail if pointed at a dark colored object, or a flat object that is at an angle to the camera. In such cases, you can use the pan focus setting though. My experience here is with the autofocus area set to "spot." It can also be set to "multi," but I haven't experimented with this yet. The macro capability of the Exilim is not great. You cannot get very close to your subject, even at the wide angle zoom setting. Switching to manual focus and crossing your fingers might help, I am still experimenting with this. The flash sometimes washes out detail in pictures due to excessive power. This occurs very frequently in close-up shots. This problem can be addressed by reducing the flash intensity, but this is an extra chore for the photographer; it is not automatic. Amazon.com shows that the Canon SD30 will be available October 10. My advice is to wait for that model to appear before committing to the Exilim. In fact, if you want to save some money, the Canon SD20 might be for you. If it is like the SD10, it will be slower than the Exilim, and it will have a weaker flash. It will also lack optical zoom. But you will get solidly better pictures with the Canon. That should count for something! -- David Arnstein | | Nice review, thanks!! I was on the verge of getting one of these though I'm a really a Canon fan. Just really attracted to the slimness of the Exilim which fits nicely in my pocket. Guess I'll stick to Canon though they're a little bigger. Have always been happy with their image quality. joe. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Review: Canon Digital IXUS 500 (aka. S500) | Patrick Röder | Digital Photography | 0 | August 17th 04 09:59 AM |
FA: Casio Exilim EX-S2 Camera & Case - reserve price $157.00 w/ shipping | longbch | Digital Photo Equipment For Sale | 0 | January 22nd 04 01:44 AM |
FA: Casio Exilim EX-S2 2MP Digital Camera & Case - buy it now price $167.95 w/ shipping | longbch | General Equipment For Sale | 0 | January 22nd 04 01:42 AM |
FA: Casio Exilim EX-S2 Camera & Case - buy it now price $167.95 w/ shipping | longbch | General Equipment For Sale | 0 | January 18th 04 12:24 AM |
NEW CASIO EXILIM EX-Z4U 4MP+256MB+CASE $429 | Digitalave2 | Digital Photo Equipment For Sale | 0 | December 14th 03 04:55 AM |