If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon 995
In article , PeterN
wrote: For me, it's the weight. Last year I tested Nikon's 200-500. Optically, it was fine. It flunked because I could not carry it around for more than 45 minutes. eat more spinach. You didn't answer my question. nobody gives a **** about your question and it wasn't relevant to the discussion. you're just trolling, as usual. Since you are a pricing expert, you should be able to make an educated guess. If not an educated guess, make an uneducated one. if you have to ask the price, you can't afford it. |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon 995
On 27-Jul-17 2:29 PM, nospam wrote:
In article , PeterN wrote: For me, it's the weight. Last year I tested Nikon's 200-500. Optically, it was fine. It flunked because I could not carry it around for more than 45 minutes. eat more spinach. You didn't answer my question. nobody gives a **** about your question and it wasn't relevant to the discussion. you're just trolling, as usual. You are WRONG about that, 'nospam' .......... and you are VERY rude too. Since you are a pricing expert, you should be able to make an educated guess. If not an educated guess, make an uneducated one. if you have to ask the price, you can't afford it. Some folk know the price of everything but the value of nothing! -- David B. |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon 995
In article , David B.
wrote: For me, it's the weight. Last year I tested Nikon's 200-500. Optically, it was fine. It flunked because I could not carry it around for more than 45 minutes. eat more spinach. You didn't answer my question. nobody gives a **** about your question and it wasn't relevant to the discussion. you're just trolling, as usual. You are WRONG about that, 'nospam' .......... and you are VERY rude too. i'm not wrong at all, and i'm rude in response to those who are rude, which includes you. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon 995
On 7/27/2017 9:29 AM, nospam wrote:
In article , PeterN wrote: For me, it's the weight. Last year I tested Nikon's 200-500. Optically, it was fine. It flunked because I could not carry it around for more than 45 minutes. eat more spinach. You didn't answer my question. nobody gives a **** about your question and it wasn't relevant to the discussion. you're just trolling, as usual. Correct. You are a nobody. Calling you out is trolling? I see. Since you are a pricing expert, you should be able to make an educated guess. If not an educated guess, make an uneducated one. if you have to ask the price, you can't afford it. Original. You just proved your ignorance of pricing policies. -- PeterN |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon 995
On 7/27/2017 10:26 AM, nospam wrote:
In article , David B. wrote: For me, it's the weight. Last year I tested Nikon's 200-500. Optically, it was fine. It flunked because I could not carry it around for more than 45 minutes. eat more spinach. You didn't answer my question. nobody gives a **** about your question and it wasn't relevant to the discussion. you're just trolling, as usual. You are WRONG about that, 'nospam' .......... and you are VERY rude too. i'm not wrong at all, and i'm rude in response to those who are rude, which includes you. And everyone else who will not kowtow to you. -- PeterN |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon 995
In article , PeterN
wrote: Since you are a pricing expert, you should be able to make an educated guess. If not an educated guess, make an uneducated one. if you have to ask the price, you can't afford it. Original. and appropriate. You just proved your ignorance of pricing policies. the discussion is not nor ever was about pricing policies. |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon 995
On 7/27/2017 12:44 PM, nospam wrote:
In article , PeterN wrote: Since you are a pricing expert, you should be able to make an educated guess. If not an educated guess, make an uneducated one. if you have to ask the price, you can't afford it. Original. and appropriate. You just proved your ignorance of pricing policies. the discussion is not nor ever was about pricing policies. Never said it was. It was about the extent of your market knowledge. -- PeterN |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon 995
In article , PeterN
wrote: the discussion is not nor ever was about pricing policies. Never said it was. in other words, you're trolling. |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon 995
On 7/27/2017 1:12 PM, nospam wrote:
In article , PeterN wrote: the discussion is not nor ever was about pricing policies. Never said it was. in other words, you're trolling. You have come to your usual unsupported and twisted conclusion. -- PeterN |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon 995
PeterN, in response to nospam:
You have come to your usual unsupported and twisted conclusion. So much time you have for arguing? Why not give it a rest. Enough hobbies you don't have? Model building, stamp or coin collecting, gardening, all compatible with your photography hobby are. -- I agree with almost everything that you have said and almost everything that you will say in your entire life. usenet *at* davidillig dawt cawm |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS in Ottawa Canada nikon F80 / nikon lens / sigma lens / kirk shoulder stock / nikon battery pack | Michel | General Equipment For Sale | 1 | October 2nd 05 01:57 PM |
FS in Ottawa Canada nikon F80 / nikon lens / sigma lens / kirk shoulder stock / nikon battery pack | Michel | 35mm Equipment for Sale | 1 | October 2nd 05 01:57 PM |
[eBay] Nikon F80 Nikon MB-16 Nikon flash SB23 Like New In Box * MINT | Patty | 35mm Equipment for Sale | 0 | December 22nd 04 12:37 AM |