Nails in P&S coffins (and DSLRs?)

In rec.photo.digital ray wrote:
| On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 07:48:45 +0000, phil-news-nospam wrote:
|
| In rec.photo.digital ray wrote: | On Sat, 07 Mar 2009
| 08:18:20 +0000, Bruce wrote: |
| | ray wrote:
| |So, in other words, you've not tried a P series or any other recent
| |Kodak camera. You've simply decided they are all junk without any
| |personal experience at all.
| |
| |At least that puts yours remarks in perspective. |
| |
| | I'm a professional photographer. Kodak doesn't offer any digital |
| cameras that are suitable for professional work. |
| | Why on earth would I be interested in trying any of Kodak's |
| consumer-grade junk?
| |
| | So, as a professional photographer, why are you wasting time in |
| rec.photo.digital? I had assumed 'rec' implied recreation rather than |
| profession.
|
| There isn't a "pro" top level group. So we had to crash the party on
| "rec".
|
| Well and good. I just don't appreciate being told that all Kodak cameras
| are junk because they don't make a 'professional' level camera - that
| seems to be the argument here.

The bottom half of consumer cameras are junk ... by definition. Junk cameras
go to the bottom ... by definition.

--
|WARNING: Due to extreme spam, googlegroups.com is blocked. Due to ignorance |
| by the abuse department, bellsouth.net is blocked. If you post to |
| Usenet from these places, find another Usenet provider ASAP. |
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (email for humans: first name in lower case at ipal.net) |