If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Don't think i am using my Canon PowerShot SD700 IS properly
I recently bought a Canon PowerShot SD700 IS after scouring all the
review sites comparing prices etc and functionality wise I am happy with it but. The pictures are killing me (which is "kinda" important). I have read though the manual and tried a myriad of settings (and combinations of settings) but my pictures still seem a bit blurry. I picked a camera with Image Stabilization specifically so blurry/fuzzy images would be less of an issue so this is particularly frustrating. It is most problematic when I try to take panoramic photos as the stitching becomes really obvious when putting together two photos that are of a different fuzziness. I have even tried holding my breath as I take these pictures and still get blurry images sometimes. I have posted some pictures I have taken as examples, they are fairly clear but then again they don't seem as clear as they should be and I wanted to see if I could get some opinions about if my standards are too high (I'm not even an amateur photographer and I have taste to match so i don't think it is pickiness) or the camera, or the settings I am using. http://www.flickr.com/photos/gtinn/tags/test/ To the right of each picture you can click on: "Taken with a Canon PowerShot SD700 IS. More properties" to view the EXIF info. Any feed back would really be appreciated! Cheers -Gaiko |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Don't think i am using my Canon PowerShot SD700 IS properly
wrote in message
oups.com... I have posted some pictures I have taken as examples, they are fairly clear but then again they don't seem as clear as they should be and I wanted to see if I could get some opinions about if my standards are too high (I'm not even an amateur photographer and I have taste to match so i don't think it is pickiness) or the camera, or the settings I am using. http://www.flickr.com/photos/gtinn/tags/test/ I looked at the first of your photos, and it is greatly reduced in size from the original. In other words, it's not the same as the photo that came from the camera. For that reason, it is impossible to determine from what you posted whether there is any problem with the camera. In order to make it possible, you need to put the unmodified, original photos somewhere that people can see them. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Don't think i am using my Canon PowerShot SD700 IS properly
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Don't think i am using my Canon PowerShot SD700 IS properly
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 12:38:09 -0400, Ed Ruf (REPLY to E-MAIL IN
SIG!) wrote: If you had looked the exif data posted shows the shots were taken at f/2.8 1/60, f/5 1/80 and f.5.6 1/250 . I didn't look because I suspected that the problem was one of technique, the OP could easily verify it or determine by following my suggestions if a defective camera might be responsible, and downloading multiple images isn't practical with my dialup connection. Asking the OP to check his own EXIF data would be more beneficial to the OP than if I did it for him, and I did provide a few clues pertaining to what should be examined. At least he was aware that EXIF data exists, but he needs to learn to understand what it can tell him. To the OP, IS is not magic and it still takes a steady hand to get sharp results at slow shutter speeds. Not knowing your background in photography we don't have any idea on your technique . . . Our replies are two peas in a pod. Heckle and Jeckle. Not Laurel and Hardy. I notice a bit of Three Stooges slapstick taking place in a nearby low light thread. I also notice several there that often complain about argumentativeness being their usual argumentative selves, dishing out eye-pokes and tossing plenty of gooey pies. Nyuk, nyuk nyuk nyuk nyuk. g |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Don't think i am using my Canon PowerShot SD700 IS properly
Doh! I am very sorry, i forgot that the full sized pictures can only
be seen by flickr members. Here are separate links to the full pictures: Taken w/ a Tripod (3 ft away) http://www.geocities.com/gaikokujin_...s/IMG_1054.jpg Taken w/o Tripod http://www.geocities.com/gaikokujin_...s/IMG_1021.jpg http://www.geocities.com/gaikokujin_...s/IMG_0969.jpg http://www.geocities.com/gaikokujin_...s/IMG_0947.jpg On Mar 18, 12:08 pm, "Andrew Koenig" wrote: wrote in message oups.com... I have posted some pictures I have taken as examples, they are fairly clear but then again they don't seem as clear as they should be and I wanted to see if I could get some opinions about if my standards are too high (I'm not even an amateur photographer and I have taste to match so i don't think it is pickiness) or the camera, or the settings I am using. http://www.flickr.com/photos/gtinn/tags/test/ I looked at the first of your photos, and it is greatly reduced in size from the original. In other words, it's not the same as the photo that came from the camera. For that reason, it is impossible to determine from what you posted whether there is any problem with the camera. In order to make it possible, you need to put the unmodified, original photos somewhere that people can see them. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Don't think i am using my Canon PowerShot SD700 IS properly
On Mar 18, 12:13 pm, ASAAR wrote:
On 18 Mar 2007 08:21:14 -0700, wrote: I recently bought a Canon PowerShot SD700 IS after scouring all the review sites comparing prices etc and functionality wise I am happy with it but. The pictures are killing me (which is "kinda" important). I have read though the manual and tried a myriad of settings (and combinations of settings) but my pictures still seem a bit blurry. I picked a camera with Image Stabilization specifically so blurry/fuzzy images would be less of an issue so this is particularly frustrating. It is most problematic when I try to take panoramic photos as the stitching becomes really obvious when putting together two photos that are of a different fuzziness. I have even tried holding my breath as I take these pictures and still get blurry images sometimes. You have it right when you say that IS makes blur less of an issue. But it's still an issue since IS doesn't eliminate blur, it can only reduce it, and the amount of blur you get will vary from shot to shot depending on how well you can hold the camera. touche, however it still seems to me that i get a bit of blur even when using a tripod (though admittedly not as much). I was not under the impression that IS would be a panacea for the blury picture but i have made it a point to hold it pretty darn still. The smaller the camera, the harder it is to hold motionless, but for panoramas you shouldn't even try. They should be taken with the camera mounted on a stable tripod, and the IS function should probably be turned off. Check the EXIF data of your pictures if you don't know what shutter speed was used. You might have used a video mode that provides a small aperture to get a large depth of field, but that would produce a slower shutter speed that increases the effect of camera movement. Try taking some shots, if not with a tripod, at least with the camera resting on a solid surface. Many photographers carry a small beanbag for this purpose, or you could fill a sock with some dry rice, or something similar. It's easily carried and allows the camera to be quickly positioned. Then see if the pictures you take are sharp enough. If not, your camera may be defective. I the pictures come out nice and sharp, you just have to use the cameras best settings and either improve your technique (learning how to hold the camera more stably) or use a tripod. Using a faster shutter speed should help, and using a higher ISO is one way to manage this, if the added "noise" it produces isn't objectionable. Panorama shots can use a shutter speed as long as needed, but don't wait too long between shots, as anything moving within the frame can cause problems, be they people, pets, vehicles or clouds. Unless you have a massive tripod, it would probably be best to use the camera's self timer, as pushing the shutter can cause the camera to vibrate enough on most lightweight tripods to cause noticeable blur. noted, I'll try some of your tips. thanks. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Don't think i am using my Canon PowerShot SD700 IS properly
On Mar 18, 12:38 pm, "Ed Ruf (REPLY to E-MAIL IN SIG!)"
wrote: On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 12:13:38 -0400, in rec.photo.digital ASAAR wrote: You have it right when you say that IS makes blur less of an issue. But it's still an issue since IS doesn't eliminate blur, it can only reduce it, and the amount of blur you get will vary from shot to shot depending on how well you can hold the camera. The smaller the camera, the harder it is to hold motionless, but for panoramas you shouldn't even try. They should be taken with the camera mounted on a stable tripod, and the IS function should probably be turned off. Check the EXIF data of your pictures if you don't know what shutter speed was used. You might have used a video mode that provides a small aperture to get a large depth of field, but that would produce a slower shutter speed that increases the effect of camera movement. Try taking some shots, if not with a tripod, at least with the camera resting on a solid surface. Many photographers carry a small beanbag for this purpose, or you could fill a sock with some dry rice, or something similar. It's easily carried and allows the camera to be quickly positioned. Then see if the pictures you take are sharp enough. If not, your camera may be defective. I the pictures come out nice and sharp, you just have to use the cameras best settings and either improve your technique (learning how to hold the camera more stably) or use a tripod. Using a faster shutter speed should help, and using a higher ISO is one way to manage this, if the added "noise" it produces isn't objectionable. Panorama shots can use a shutter speed as long as needed, but don't wait too long between shots, as anything moving within the frame can cause problems, be they people, pets, vehicles or clouds. Unless you have a massive tripod, it would probably be best to use the camera's self timer, as pushing the shutter can cause the camera to vibrate enough on most lightweight tripods to cause noticeable blur. If you had looked the exif data posted shows the shots were taken at f/2.8 1/60, f/5 1/80 and f.5.6 1/250 . To the OP, IS is not magic and it still takes a steady hand to get sharp results at slow shutter speeds. Not knowing your background in photography we don't have any idea on your technique. Just holding your breath means nothing if you yourself are not still. You need to talk about technique, such as the most simple question, are you using the viewfinder or composing the shot using the lcd and therefore holding the camera at arm's length, which obviously is not recommended? -- Ed Ruf )http://edwardgruf.com/Digital_Photog...ral/index.html I have tried using both, admittedly using the LCD more often than not but i have gotten similar results using the view finder. Also, i know the IS is not magic (would be nice though) but i expected it to compensate somewhat for what little shake there is when i take a shot. I make it a point to be very still, some times using the view finder or resting my elbow on the table etc. I feel like i am getting the same picture that i got with an old Minolta Dimage5 that didn't have IS. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Don't think i am using my Canon PowerShot SD700 IS properly
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 08:21:14 -0700, gaikokujinkyofusho wrote:
I recently bought a Canon PowerShot SD700 IS after scouring all the review sites comparing prices etc and functionality wise I am happy with it but. The pictures are killing me (which is "kinda" important). I have read though the manual and tried a myriad of settings (and combinations of settings) but my pictures still seem a bit blurry. I picked a camera with Image Stabilization specifically so blurry/fuzzy images would be less of an issue so this is particularly frustrating. It is most problematic when I try to take panoramic photos as the stitching becomes really obvious when putting together two photos that are of a different fuzziness. I have even tried holding my breath as I take these pictures and still get blurry images sometimes. IMHO - best route to panoramas is to use a tripod and turn the IS off. I have posted some pictures I have taken as examples, they are fairly clear but then again they don't seem as clear as they should be and I wanted to see if I could get some opinions about if my standards are too high (I'm not even an amateur photographer and I have taste to match so i don't think it is pickiness) or the camera, or the settings I am using. http://www.flickr.com/photos/gtinn/tags/test/ To the right of each picture you can click on: "Taken with a Canon PowerShot SD700 IS. More properties" to view the EXIF info. Any feed back would really be appreciated! Cheers -Gaiko |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Don't think i am using my Canon PowerShot SD700 IS properly
On Mar 18, 11:21 am, wrote:
I recently bought a Canon PowerShot SD700 IS after scouring all the review sites comparing prices etc and functionality wise I am happy with it but. The pictures are killing me (which is "kinda" important). I have read though the manual and tried a myriad of settings (and combinations of settings) but my pictures still seem a bit blurry. I picked a camera with Image Stabilization specifically so blurry/fuzzy images would be less of an issue so this is particularly frustrating. It is most problematic when I try to take panoramic photos as the stitching becomes really obvious when putting together two photos that are of a different fuzziness. I have even tried holding my breath as I take these pictures and still get blurry images sometimes. I have posted some pictures I have taken as examples, they are fairly clear but then again they don't seem as clear as they should be and I wanted to see if I could get some opinions about if my standards are too high (I'm not even an amateur photographer and I have taste to match so i don't think it is pickiness) or the camera, or the settings I am using. http://www.flickr.com/photos/gtinn/tags/test/ To the right of each picture you can click on: "Taken with a Canon PowerShot SD700 IS. More properties" to view the EXIF info. Any feed back would really be appreciated! Cheers -Gaiko You thought it was an anal probe? |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Canon SD700 - How to remove faceplate? | ZRexRider | Digital Photography | 2 | February 11th 07 12:48 PM |
Canon SD700 IS? | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 15 | September 3rd 06 11:13 PM |
Change the filename template on Canon SD700? | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 1 | August 4th 06 05:36 PM |
Max write speed of Canon PowerShot SD700 IS? | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 4 | July 29th 06 03:02 PM |
Canon A 610 - how to properly use macro | sweetangel | Digital Photography | 4 | January 20th 06 02:46 PM |