If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#251
|
|||
|
|||
35mm film vs Digital..what is the difference?
Skip wrote:
"Paul Furman" wrote in message et... Skip wrote: "Paul Furman" wrote in message . net... jeremy wrote: "Skip" wrote in message ... "Paul Furman" wrote in message .net... Skip wrote: "jeremy" wrote in message "That_Rich" wrote in message DOF scales on my lenses work flawlessly and I use them all the time. One of the parts of *upgrading* to digital that makes me shudder is lack of DOF scales on the lenses. I'll stick with film a while longer. But, just think: With the immediacy of digital, you can check your shots right after taking them to see if they were in focus! Isn't technology great? My LCD on my 5D isn't really good enough to check critical focus, and I doubt any other one is, either. "Good enough," maybe, but not critical. The D200 is quick to zoom in 100% or even 200%. Oh, it zooms, quite quickly, but are you willing to trust such a low resolution image to tell you that you are absolutely, with out a doubt, in focus? I'm not. I was being sarcastic when I suggested that DOF scales could be done away with now that the photo could be viewed on the LCD screen. I know you were joking but really I think it is good enough at 200% inconvenient to scroll around to assess DOF but for checking shake you can flip thru a set of shots at full zoom. Well, yes, you can check for gross focus errors, but not critical focus. I checked and the same file on my laptop at 100% zoom is a bit smaller than the max zoom on the D200 LCD. Hmm, interesting. I've not checked my laptop, since I don't do any PP on it (angle of view issues.) But I wouldn't have thunk it... I know the max zoom on my 5D is smaller than 100% on my desktop, but that's a 20" monitor. Laptop is 1280x800 destop is a 21" at 1280x960 |
#252
|
|||
|
|||
35mm film vs Digital..what is the difference?
In article ,
Graham Fountain wrote: Their first practical day arrives, they are shooting portraits, and have to use a wide aperture to reduce DOF. So, day one is portraits, and everybody knows that the most important part of portrait photography is shallow DOF. No, it is not about interacting with the model, chosing the right light, etc. No it is all about shallow DOF. I'd say, look for a real course. Prac Day 2 arrives and they go into the studio to practice using the studio flash. With the power of the lighting, the flash meter indicates they need to use F8 at ISO 100. Johnny confidently sets his camera to M, presses the buttons to change his shutter to 1/100, and starts to change the aperture to F8 - damn, his camera only has 5.6 as the smallest aperture. And here is goes from bad to worse. We just had portraits with shallow DOF but the studio flash requires f/8. I wonder what they used for the portraits. Anyhow, if you can't reduce the output of the flash, it is time to get a new flash. The next day they are photographing kids down at the kindy. To help them develop their skills, autofocus is forbidden. Yeah, right. People are encourged to buy el-cheapo SLRs (which are often AF and have poor viewfinders) and then they have to practice manual focus on moving targets. (And that with film, so there is no feedback until after the shoot when they have the film developed). Again, find a better course. -- That was it. Done. The faulty Monk was turned out into the desert where it could believe what it liked, including the idea that it had been hard done by. It was allowed to keep its horse, since horses were so cheap to make. -- Douglas Adams in Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency |
#253
|
|||
|
|||
35mm film vs Digital..what is the difference?
THO wrote:
In article coh.net, (Philip Homburg) wrote: In article , Graham Fountain wrote: The next day they are photographing kids down at the kindy. To help them develop their skills, autofocus is forbidden. Yeah, right. People are encourged to buy el-cheapo SLRs (which are often AF and have poor viewfinders) and then they have to practice manual focus on moving targets. (And that with film, so there is no feedback until after the shoot when they have the film developed). Again, find a better course. Once upon a time, we didn't have autofocus and the pictures mostly were focused just fine. As an educational exercise, it works fine. The instructor wants the students to think about focus and not just rely on what the camera does automatically. One of the problems is that the cheap film SLRs seem to mostly be missing the DOF preview button. The focusing screen on the cheap SLRs are also about the same as on the consumer level of DSLRs, yes you can focus with them but it takes technique to do so. I shoot a lot of frames with the 20D practicing this can have gotten pretty good but I would no expect someone to just pickup a low end film SLR and be able to effectively focus it manually. Then to the kit lenses that use to come with almost all SLRs were 50mm at around f/1.4 or f/1.8, which is good if you are manually focusing, now the kit lenses are all pretty much slower zooms, not so good for manual focusing. In short more has changed then just the shift from film - digital in terms of what you get with an entry level SLR. Scott Scott |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
35mm Film vs Digital again | Graham Fountain | 35mm Photo Equipment | 23 | December 22nd 05 04:45 AM |
Digital images to 35mm slide film | Malevil | Digital SLR Cameras | 3 | March 13th 05 06:07 AM |
35mm film vs digital | Conrad Weiler | Digital Photography | 49 | January 5th 05 04:01 AM |
Developing 35mm film into digital | Stuart Droker | Film & Labs | 1 | September 20th 04 04:15 PM |
Any successfulB&W digital images from 35mm film? | QkaG | In The Darkroom | 11 | April 6th 04 07:11 PM |