If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Please explain?
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 13:33:57 -0400, Alan Browne
wrote: : Alan Browne wrote: : Moose & Squirrel wrote: : Alan Browne wrote: : : PS: Where are your SI submissions? : : : Can an alleged "sockpuppet" actually submit to the SI? And *if* Helen : really was a "sock," and the owner also submitted as well, then would : this not be more than the three submissions allowed... : : I have no reason to believe she is a sock and as you carefully use : adverbs like alleged, then apparently neither do you. : : adjective. /sigh/ I believe most grammarians would call it a verbal (specifically an adjectival past participle). Unlike "true" adjectives, it's not subject to comparison. Moving right on ... Given the email address problems you've reported, would it be possible for you to publish the names of those from whom you *have* received SI submissions? I've yet to see a confirmation of the three images I sent to the replacement address, and I'm concerned that they (along with my earlier submission to the bogus address) may be wallowing in the bit bucket somewhere. Bob |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Please explain?
Robert Coe wrote:
I've yet to see a confirmation of the three images I sent to the replacement address, and I'm concerned that they (along with my earlier submission to the bogus address) may be wallowing in the bit bucket somewhere. I sent you a reply at 10:41 EDST yesterday stating that all 3 have been received. -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch. -- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Please explain?
Annika1980 wrote:
On Aug 30, 6:30 pm, John McWilliams wrote: You could simply stop the baiting, taunting and especially the cross-posting. That's the "little" you can do. Hah! You and a few others - fortunately a very few- are the only ones who consistently start x-posts. You and "Rita" are the two who do the most of it, and the ones I will set followups to r.p.d. when I want. Funny though, when Rita or someone else does it they don't get the RITA IS A PEDOPHILE treatment. I don't think anyone thinks that's amusing. Peculiar funny, yes. Might be yet another reason to stop x-posting to aus.photo, as well as not cross posting, period. -- john mcwilliams |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Please explain?
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 12:58:52 -0400, Alan Browne wrote:
- JT wishes all the readership in Australia a happy September 1st. What's so special in Australia about 09.01? ... here, Canada (and US "Labor Day") Sept. 1 is "Labour Day" (or rather 1st Monday of Sept.) Not necessarily what Rocky and Bullwinkle had in mind, but there is a : Security Treaty Between the United States, Australia, and New Zealand (ANZUS); September 1, 1951 http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/in...ti/usmu002.htm |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Please explain?
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 13:53:50 -0400, Alan Browne wrote:
When you catch an adjective, kill it. -Mark Twain I don't kill what I won't eat. I eat a lot of spiders and mosquitoes because of that... We'll make you eat your words for that, bub. g |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Please explain?
Savageduck wrote in
news:2008083012075477923-savageduck@savagenet: On 2008-08-30 10:21:06 -0700, BlackShadow said: No, I'm not Pauline Hanson nor is she my aunty. Well that is sad. What I'd appreciate is some explanation about is the puerile feud going on with Annika and noons and their many and varied socks. If somebody could explain it, you might start bleeding from your eyes and/or ears. You might forgo ever going online again. You might become a stealth warrior and eliminate them for the benefit of all mankind, or you might retire to a mounain top to contemplate your navel. So don't question it, just sit back and enjoy the show. There wasn't any question about it. The OP is simply making an overt statement about turning posters in for "pedophilia" while making the statement that people who flame with the "pedo" tag are in fact begging for covert LE involvement in their lives, to be notated in a non-purgeable "pedophile" investigation file. Sounds about right. AFAIKT - this k00kfight is nothing more than arguments about who has the best equipment, shooting talent, etc...and can't win with simple debates so the lowest common denominator usenet flameword appears. DumbDumb isn't interested to k/f those posts. For the record, these trolltards should put their money in their mouths, **** and get off the pot, stop with the whines, whatever, and just file a report to their police about each other, but they dont because they know it's just a silly trolling flamewar. That OP doesn't take this in that light - and thinks that reporting these rediculous trolls will make the LEA thank them with applauds and accolades, (or so he wants the trolls to believe). Yeah RRRRIGHT. More importantly, so he thinks, is that the threat of report is enough to make some other people to stop posting their flamewars. RRRRIGHT #2. That fallacy is quacky...Just report them and complain to their provider. No bluffs are needed. Take it real life - just be sure to note your motivation here. No more needs done, besides a kf entry. LE might ask why you continue to see them if you complained about them in the first place. It depends, is it worth prosecution over name calling ninnies? -- SneakyP To reply: newsgroup only, what's posted in ng stays in ng. Some choose to swim in the potty bowl of nan-ae rather than flush it down :0) |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Please explain?
"Rita Berkowitz" wrote in message
m... There's nothing wrong with spending 10 or 15 minutes a day to stir the pot, so to say. How about those of us who try to have an intelligent discourse while certain folks, who very well may be incapable of same, just troll onwards. I agree that many here have too much time and emotional investment in the groups. But this leads you back to what you're dealing with. Most likely these folks are a bunch of washed up senile geezers that really have nothing else better to do. I've learned long ago that trying to help people on Usenet is a futile effort. The people that genuinely come here for help are met with negativity and bickering. And there are many who genuinely want to help and many who actually get good information. There are latent A-holes in real life who can come out without fear of exposure. I truly feel sorry for them. Then you have the people "regulars" that morph to try to get attention by passing off seeming innocent questions for the sake of getting a response. You mean like trying to start a Nikon v Canon debate? That's why I find it is best to sit back and stimulate on my own terms and pace. So you believe in self gratification? Glad you have a sense of humor. -- Peter |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Please explain?
Peter wrote:
"Rita Berkowitz" wrote in message m... There's nothing wrong with spending 10 or 15 minutes a day to stir the pot, so to say. How about those of us who try to have an intelligent discourse while certain folks, who very well may be incapable of same, just troll onwards. I agree that many here have too much time and emotional investment in the groups. But this leads you back to what you're dealing with. Most likely these folks are a bunch of washed up senile geezers that really have nothing else better to do. I've learned long ago that trying to help people on Usenet is a futile effort. The people that genuinely come here for help are met with negativity and bickering. And there are many who genuinely want to help and many who actually get good information. There are latent A-holes in real life who can come out without fear of exposure. I truly feel sorry for them. Then you have the people "regulars" that morph to try to get attention by passing off seeming innocent questions for the sake of getting a response. You mean like trying to start a Nikon v Canon debate? That's why I find it is best to sit back and stimulate on my own terms and pace. So you believe in self gratification? Glad you have a sense of humor. "Rita" is also superior to the rest of the group here. It's his playground, and so anything goes, including incessant cross posting. -- john mcwilliams |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Please explain?
Noons wrote:
On Sep 1, 11:32 am, Annika1980 wrote: On Aug 31, 3:10 am, Noons wrote: in case you haven't noticed I hardly ever drink: it's against my religion. Is that why you hardly ever beat your wife and only rarely abuse your daughter? What religion is that ..... 7th Day Atheist? another one for the record. Kep ait it, coward. It only shows to the evidence the filthy quality of your thought process. you really have no clue, do you? I don't give a **** about photography, you dickhead. Obviously. Of course. It's only a hobby. In your case though, it's gonna hurt when you're stopped from doing it... |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Please explain?
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Please explain? | BlackShadow | Digital Photography | 61 | September 5th 08 02:35 PM |
Please explain TIF And RAW | Richard DeLuca | Digital Photography | 10 | October 15th 06 07:48 PM |
Could someone please explain this? | joe mama | In The Darkroom | 40 | August 20th 06 05:15 PM |
Could someone please explain this? | joe mama | 35mm Photo Equipment | 39 | August 10th 06 01:39 AM |
Please explain something | Sam | Digital Photography | 9 | July 25th 04 03:50 AM |