Please explain?

zen wrote:
"BlackShadow" wrote in message
...

Do you know what one of the first things the Police do is?


Explain all their carefully worked out top secret procedures to
the first Joe who walks in off the street ?

There is nothing top secret about it, and I am not just a "Joe off the
street" I have a long established relationship with other areas of Policing
that don't include this sort of thing. It gets me a degree of courteous
acceptance.

I have posted nothing that they haven't publicised themselves during the
huge international joint AFP/FBI paedophile operation earlier this year.
Some senior AFP (Australia Federal Police) were reprimanded for releasing
investigative details prior to the completion of all the arrests but
responded with: "If they know how easy it is for us to catch them it is
less likely to happen." Sort of like road traffic red light cameras, if
they weren't common knowledge more people would speed.


BlackShadow

Alan LeHun wrote:
In article ,
says...
Interestingly, after an "off the record" conversation this morning with a
member of an organisation called "Police Task Force Argos" about this
matter, I was told that non-paedophiles, in Police experience, are so
uncomfortable with paedophilia that they won't use the term, even joking or
as a term of abuse.


You seem to have no trouble using it.



I have a great deal of trouble with it, that is why I am taking this course
of action.

BlackShadow

On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 19:07:16 -0700 (PDT), Noons wrote:
: On Aug 31, 5:58*am, Helen wrote:
:
: I know nothing about Noons. *Just from his presence on the newsgroups,
: anyone can see how he displays a very unpleasant, violent and
: aggressive combative attitude. *
:
: You got that right, "Helen": you know NOTHING.

Well, arguably "she" knows enough not to get into a ****ing contest with a
sock puppet.

: Souto is trying his utmost best to destroy Annika1980's personna, and
: in doing so, has labeled him the most vile and disgusting human being
: on the face of the earth: *a pedophile.
:
: Absolutely. And I shall continue until he either gets
: locked up or sued out of his pants. And guess what:
: YOU will NOT be able to stop me. Hurts to hear
: the truth once doesn't it, you lying sack of ****!

Curse me, Noons, I'm getting a bit old and senile, and I've been hanging
around these photography newsgroups for less than two years. So I've somehow
missed seeing any proof of your allegations. Can't you at least provide us
with some reason why we should believe you instead of Bret?

: We are close friends
:
: We know that, Helen. Can you stop stating the OBVIOUS?
:
: and I will state my reputation,
:
: and your "close friendship", stated above by you, immediately
: disqualifies ANYTHING you say as conflict of interest,
: you stupid lying bitch!
:
: and swear to this
: on the Holy Bible
:
: you know where you can shove your "holy" bible,
: don't you?
:
: that Annika1980 is NOT, I repeat NOT a pedophile.
:
: I disagree. He is a PEDOPHILE and a CHILD-ABUSER,
: and you aid and abet him.
:
: It started as a joke and snowballed into a horrible rumor with no
: truth to it at all.
:
: Let's keep laughing then: we'll see who laughs last.
: For smeone who claims to know a lot about law,
: you prove again and again that not only are you incapable
: of conducting yourself in a lawful manner in public
: but you also have NO CLUE about international law.

Since you bring it up, how's your knowledge of that subject? I assume you know
that the USA doesn't recognize "international law" except to the extent that
our treaty obligations require it. Can you explain what treaties apply in this
case and how you propose to establish their relevance?

: I verify this to be the truth and anyone can contact me through this
: email address.
:
: BWAHAHAHAHA!
:
: How about this, then:
: **** OFF aus.photo, you STUPID BITCH!

One thing that puzzles me: If you're so fastidious about keeping irrelevant
stuff out of aus.photo, why do *you* persist in cross-posting this thread
there?

Bob

Annika1980 wrote:
Funny though, when Rita or someone else does it they don't get the
RITA IS A PEDOPHILE treatment.

Who cares what particular treatment they get ... it still fouls the NG.


--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
-- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out.

Helen wrote:

BTW: I replied to you because I refuse to reply to that thing.

Why not just stop fouling the group with this nonsense? Don't reply to
the braindead like Noons, directly or otherwise... Seems sometime in
the past you said you would do exactly that...

PS: Where are your SI submissions?

--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
-- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out.

Helen wrote:

PS look for my SI submission today.

Plural, please. 3 per customer!


--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
-- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out.

Moose & Squirrel wrote:
Alan Browne wrote:

PS: Where are your SI submissions?


Can an alleged "sockpuppet" actually submit to the SI? And *if* Helen
really was a "sock," and the owner also submitted as well, then would
this not be more than the three submissions allowed...

I have no reason to believe she is a sock and as you carefully use
adverbs like alleged, then apparently neither do you.

I look forward t your SI submissions as well.




- JT
wishes all the readership in Australia a happy September 1st.

What's so special in Australia about 09.01? ...

here, Canada (and US "Labor Day") Sept. 1 is "Labour Day" (or rather 1st
Monday of Sept.)



--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
-- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out.

Alan Browne wrote:
Moose & Squirrel wrote:
Alan Browne wrote:

PS: Where are your SI submissions?


Can an alleged "sockpuppet" actually submit to the SI? And *if* Helen
really was a "sock," and the owner also submitted as well, then would
this not be more than the three submissions allowed...

I have no reason to believe she is a sock and as you carefully use
adverbs like alleged, then apparently neither do you.

adjective. /sigh/

--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
-- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out.

Alan Browne wrote:
Alan Browne wrote:
Moose & Squirrel wrote:
Alan Browne wrote:

PS: Where are your SI submissions?


Can an alleged "sockpuppet" actually submit to the SI? And *if*
Helen really was a "sock," and the owner also submitted as well,
then would this not be more than the three submissions allowed...

I have no reason to believe she is a sock and as you carefully use
adverbs like alleged, then apparently neither do you.

adjective. /sigh/

When you catch an adjective, kill it.
-Mark Twain


--
Frank ess

Frank ess wrote:


Alan Browne wrote:
Alan Browne wrote:
Moose & Squirrel wrote:
Alan Browne wrote:

PS: Where are your SI submissions?


Can an alleged "sockpuppet" actually submit to the SI? And *if*
Helen really was a "sock," and the owner also submitted as well,
then would this not be more than the three submissions allowed...

I have no reason to believe she is a sock and as you carefully use
adverbs like alleged, then apparently neither do you.

adjective. /sigh/

When you catch an adjective, kill it.
-Mark Twain

I don't kill what I won't eat. I eat a lot of spiders and mosquitoes
because of that...


--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
-- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out.