If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Please explain?
"BlackShadow" wrote in message
... zen wrote: "BlackShadow" wrote in message ... Do you know what one of the first things the Police do is? Explain all their carefully worked out top secret procedures to the first Joe who walks in off the street ? There is nothing top secret about it, and I am not just a "Joe off the street" I have a long established relationship with other areas of Policing that don't include this sort of thing. It gets me a degree of courteous acceptance. I have posted nothing that they haven't publicised themselves during the huge international joint AFP/FBI paedophile operation earlier this year. Some senior AFP (Australia Federal Police) were reprimanded for releasing investigative details prior to the completion of all the arrests but responded with: "If they know how easy it is for us to catch them it is less likely to happen." Sort of like road traffic red light cameras, if they weren't common knowledge more people would speed. BlackShadow nice troll BTW, one post and all these fish Oh and your full of ****, just thought you should know :-) -- "Calling Atheism a religion is like calling bald a hair color." Don Hirschberg |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Please explain?
Atheist Chaplain wrote:
"BlackShadow" wrote in message ... zen wrote: "BlackShadow" wrote in message ... Do you know what one of the first things the Police do is? Explain all their carefully worked out top secret procedures to the first Joe who walks in off the street ? There is nothing top secret about it, and I am not just a "Joe off the street" I have a long established relationship with other areas of Policing that don't include this sort of thing. It gets me a degree of courteous acceptance. I have posted nothing that they haven't publicised themselves during the huge international joint AFP/FBI paedophile operation earlier this year. Some senior AFP (Australia Federal Police) were reprimanded for releasing investigative details prior to the completion of all the arrests but responded with: "If they know how easy it is for us to catch them it is less likely to happen." Sort of like road traffic red light cameras, if they weren't common knowledge more people would speed. BlackShadow nice troll BTW, one post and all these fish Oh and your full of ****, just thought you should know :-) Oh? I don't have a full of ****, so I'm not sure what you are referring to. Or did you mean "you're full of ****"? It ain't a troll, it is a response, and it has been looked at by relevant Police and is in the initial stages of being acted on. They spent several hours examining posts from both parties, feel that in all likelihood they are both just being idiots, but one, and they did not specify which one, makes them a little uneasy. Has some indicators that are often associated with true paedophiles. For the record, if I was in a position where I had to put real money on it, I don't think that either of them are likely to be genuine paedophiles, but I think that Annika presents as someone who could easily lean that way. Let the good times roll. BlackShadow |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Please explain?
"BlackShadow" wrote in message
... Atheist Chaplain wrote: "BlackShadow" wrote in message ... zen wrote: "BlackShadow" wrote in message ... Do you know what one of the first things the Police do is? Explain all their carefully worked out top secret procedures to the first Joe who walks in off the street ? There is nothing top secret about it, and I am not just a "Joe off the street" I have a long established relationship with other areas of Policing that don't include this sort of thing. It gets me a degree of courteous acceptance. I have posted nothing that they haven't publicised themselves during the huge international joint AFP/FBI paedophile operation earlier this year. Some senior AFP (Australia Federal Police) were reprimanded for releasing investigative details prior to the completion of all the arrests but responded with: "If they know how easy it is for us to catch them it is less likely to happen." Sort of like road traffic red light cameras, if they weren't common knowledge more people would speed. BlackShadow nice troll BTW, one post and all these fish Oh and your full of ****, just thought you should know :-) Oh? I don't have a full of ****, so I'm not sure what you are referring to. Or did you mean "you're full of ****"? It ain't a troll, it is a response, and it has been looked at by relevant Police and is in the initial stages of being acted on. They spent several hours examining posts from both parties, feel that in all likelihood they are both just being idiots, but one, and they did not specify which one, makes them a little uneasy. Has some indicators that are often associated with true paedophiles. and now I know you're full of **** :-) but hey just keep bleating away to the uneducated masses, I'm sure most of them believe you Hahahahahaha! Troll! and not only a troll but a grammar kop as well. -- God made me an atheist. Who are you to question his wisdom? For the record, if I was in a position where I had to put real money on it, I don't think that either of them are likely to be genuine paedophiles, but I think that Annika presents as someone who could easily lean that way. Let the good times roll. BlackShadow |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Please explain?
"Rita Berkowitz" wrote in message
m... There's nothing wrong with spending 10 or 15 minutes a day to stir the pot, so to say. How about those of us who try to have an intelligent discourse while certain folks, who very well may be incapable of same, just troll onwards. I agree that many here have too much time and emotional investment in the groups. But this leads you back to what you're dealing with. Most likely these folks are a bunch of washed up senile geezers that really have nothing else better to do. I've learned long ago that trying to help people on Usenet is a futile effort. The people that genuinely come here for help are met with negativity and bickering. And there are many who genuinely want to help and many who actually get good information. There are latent A-holes in real life who can come out without fear of exposure. I truly feel sorry for them. Then you have the people "regulars" that morph to try to get attention by passing off seeming innocent questions for the sake of getting a response. You mean like trying to start a Nikon v Canon debate? That's why I find it is best to sit back and stimulate on my own terms and pace. So you believe in self gratification? Glad you have a sense of humor. -- Peter |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Please explain?
Peter wrote:
"Rita Berkowitz" wrote in message m... There's nothing wrong with spending 10 or 15 minutes a day to stir the pot, so to say. How about those of us who try to have an intelligent discourse while certain folks, who very well may be incapable of same, just troll onwards. I agree that many here have too much time and emotional investment in the groups. But this leads you back to what you're dealing with. Most likely these folks are a bunch of washed up senile geezers that really have nothing else better to do. I've learned long ago that trying to help people on Usenet is a futile effort. The people that genuinely come here for help are met with negativity and bickering. And there are many who genuinely want to help and many who actually get good information. There are latent A-holes in real life who can come out without fear of exposure. I truly feel sorry for them. Then you have the people "regulars" that morph to try to get attention by passing off seeming innocent questions for the sake of getting a response. You mean like trying to start a Nikon v Canon debate? That's why I find it is best to sit back and stimulate on my own terms and pace. So you believe in self gratification? Glad you have a sense of humor. "Rita" is also superior to the rest of the group here. It's his playground, and so anything goes, including incessant cross posting. -- john mcwilliams |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Please explain?
Noons wrote:
On Sep 1, 11:32 am, Annika1980 wrote: On Aug 31, 3:10 am, Noons wrote: in case you haven't noticed I hardly ever drink: it's against my religion. Is that why you hardly ever beat your wife and only rarely abuse your daughter? What religion is that ..... 7th Day Atheist? another one for the record. Kep ait it, coward. It only shows to the evidence the filthy quality of your thought process. you really have no clue, do you? I don't give a **** about photography, you dickhead. Obviously. Of course. It's only a hobby. In your case though, it's gonna hurt when you're stopped from doing it... |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Please explain?
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Please explain?
Annika1980 wrote:
On Sep 1, 6:13 am, Noons wrote: Why should I curse you? I don't attack old men, like Bret and his sock puppets from rec.sport.golf do. Ask him: he'll promptly claim it was anyone else but him. As usual. First off, dip****, I don't use sockpuppets. A Google search will reveal that I am approaching the 40,000 post mark. Now when the Hell would I have time to use socks? And why would I want to? I say what I need to say as it is. He googles himself! If that doesn't say it all then nothing can. Ribbit |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Please explain?
Rita Berkowitz wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote: As for the playground, you're right. I single handedly stimulate enough idiots to drop the noise floor to the point of being nonexistent. So you're a malicious asshole who is determined to destroy these newsgroups. No, Yes. You just stated as much. just a concerned citizen that is taking back the groups to bring peace Don't lie to me, asshole. -- Ray Fischer |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Please explain?
Annika1980 wrote:
On Sep 2, 7:07 pm, Noons wrote: Didn't you know this is all "sponsored" by pbase and its pack of trolls? Boy, Noons, you are all over it! We thought we could fool you, but you saw right through our ruse. I thought that by Rita using Flickr we could throw you off the scent, but like a bloodhound you tracked us down. I think we can get SI sponsorship from photo.net next time. -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch. -- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Please explain TIF And RAW | Richard DeLuca | Digital Photography | 10 | October 15th 06 07:48 PM |
Could someone please explain this? | joe mama | In The Darkroom | 40 | August 20th 06 05:15 PM |
Could someone please explain this? | joe mama | 35mm Photo Equipment | 39 | August 10th 06 01:39 AM |
Can somebody explain .... | Mike | Digital Photography | 16 | October 21st 04 08:13 AM |
Please explain something | Sam | Digital Photography | 9 | July 25th 04 03:50 AM |