|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
May 8th 14, 09:37 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
New Leica T. Is this build-quality counter-productive in thisday and age?
On 05/03/2014 02:32 AM, RichA wrote:
Leica's are built beautifully, comparing them to even a top Nikon is like comparing a Rolex to a Seiko watch. This kind of build quality would have been a great benefit when people kept cameras for 10 years, in the SLR days, but does it make sense now or just expensive? http://www.dpreview.com/products/leica/slrs/leica_t701 Of course a Seiko watch keeps time just as well as a Rolex. Some people might be impressed with a Rolex or a Leica but when I see people waste money I kind of think they are dumb...even if they are quite wealthy. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New Leica T. Is this build-quality counter-productive in this day and age? | Eric Stevens | Digital Photography | 3 | October 16th 14 12:30 AM |
| New Leica T. Is this build-quality counter-productive in this day and age? | Oregonian Haruspex | Digital Photography | 0 | May 8th 14 03:21 AM |
| New Leica T. Is this build-quality counter-productive in thisday and age? | Mort[_3_] | Digital Photography | 2 | May 8th 14 03:00 AM |
| Build quality? | Charles Schuler | Digital SLR Cameras | 34 | February 7th 07 12:31 AM |
| Ratings on build quality from Brit mag | RichA | Digital SLR Cameras | 21 | March 15th 05 10:49 AM |
Threaded Mode