If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Please explain?
No, I'm not Pauline Hanson nor is she my aunty.
What I'd appreciate is some explanation about is the puerile feud going on with Annika and noons and their many and varied socks. Each seems to accusing the other of being a paedophile and making nasty suggestions about the other's children and their relationship to them. This is of concern, it has been going on for some time and seems to show no indication of abating. My concern is as to whether there is even a remote trace of truth in either of their claims. I feel that the Police need to become involved. These are people who spend an inordinate amount of time on the net (a place where genuine paedophiles frequent) and are interested to some small degree in photography, another paedophile trait. If they are totally innocent of all the paedophile related charges they are hurling at each other, then nothing will happen to them. Not directly. I am going to make a formal, written complaint to the Police. I will make my approach through a reasonably senior Police Officer who I have known for some years and trust him to hand it down to the relevant section for a full investigation. I will make it plain that I am not at all sure that either is in fact a paedophile, but as there is a potential for a children to be involved, that I feel a very thorough investigation is advisable. I will of course, not be using "BlackShadow" but my correct name and title. It is likely that nothing will come of it once the Police finish investigating; I think that in all probability they are just two immature twits who have chosen an unfortunate way of expressing invective. A bit like shouting "terrorist" in an airport when you think about the way suspected paedophiles are investigated nowadays. Most paedophile investigations last at least two years before the suspected paedophile is either charged or dropped to an inactive level. (I don't think that they are ever actually cleared.) During that two years, all email, newsgroup posting, landlines and cell phone calls are monitored. Their neighbours and workmates are subtly questioned and their families' medical records examined. Their children's school staff will be queried and any ex spouses or children also questioned. The Police don't even need to query the news servers like motzarella, google or individual etc., they work directly with the ISPs of the suspects. That power came into force in Queensland this week, the last Australian state to comply. The Police are probably going to be anxious to use their new "no warrant required" powers. I can't imagine why people would do this. Police *cannot* and will not ignore a suspect child abuse or paedophile issue, even if they immediately suspect that the person involved is just an idiot with a loud mouth and not really a paedophile. Of course, as long nothing else they do is illicit, if their possessions are all legitimate, if they don't have vindictive exes, if their employers are open-minded, if their neighbours are understanding and trust them, if the kids at their children's school don't gossip, then all will be ok - as long as they aren't paedophiles. Oh, and most suspects get attention from the tax office and immigration to check on income and travel. I almost forgot that one. I am not kidding, after all, it is a civil duty and it costs me nothing but a letter not much longer nor different to this post. Usually the suspect won't even be aware of Police attention for months, not until rumours from neighbours or workmates etc., start to reach them. The reason I feel this way? Because the old saw about smoke and fire has some truth in it. If these two continue with the paedophile abuse and comments about each other's children, this needs to happen. One or both of them might be a deviate. Maybe they are paedophiles who had a falling out - who can tell with all these accusations muddying the waters? Why don't the two of you claim to be relatives of Bin Laden and threaten to blow each other up - that would attract less official attention than calling each other a paedophile. One thing is absolutely certain, whether you are paedophiles or not, you are both idiots to keep shouting paedophile the way you do. BlackShadow Maybe when the Police seize their computers for a forensic examination they'll post some images and we can see if either one of them is actually a photographer. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Please explain TIF And RAW | Richard DeLuca | Digital Photography | 10 | October 15th 06 07:48 PM |
Could someone please explain this? | joe mama | In The Darkroom | 40 | August 20th 06 05:15 PM |
Could someone please explain this? | joe mama | 35mm Photo Equipment | 39 | August 10th 06 01:39 AM |
Can somebody explain .... | Mike | Digital Photography | 16 | October 21st 04 08:13 AM |
Please explain something | Sam | Digital Photography | 9 | July 25th 04 03:50 AM |